Skip to main content

Psychological Mindedness Assessment Procedure (PMAP)

  • Chapter
Methoden der empirischen Gruppentherapieforschung

Zusammenfassung

Auf seiten der Patienten wird die Dimension einer psychologischen Sensibilität fir die Arbeit in allen Formen psychoanalytisch orientierter Therapie generell als wichtig anerkannt. Es gibt jedoch ziemlich wenig Übereinstimmung bezüglich des begrifflichen Kontextes. Bei dem Versuch diese „psychologische Sensibilität“ oder „psychological mindedness“ zu definieren, haben zahlreiche Autoren psychodynamische Konzepte herangezogen (z.B. Appelbaum, 1973; Bloch, 1979; Tyson & Sandler, 1971; Wolitzky & Reuben, 1974), andere taten dies nicht (z.B. Dollinger et al., 1983; Fenigstein et al., 1975; Farber, 1989). Entsprechend wurde der Terminus „Psychological Mindedness“ in Analogie mit einer ganzen Reihe von Begriffen benutzt, wie z.B. „Einsicht“, „Introspektion“, „Selbst-Bewußtheit“, „Fähigkeit der Selbst-Beobachtung“ oder „auf das Selbst gerichtete Aufmerksamkeit“. Es hat auch verschiedene Versuche gegeben, den Prozeß der psychologischen Sensibilität zu konzeptualisieren (Hall, 1992). So wurde sie z.B. als Motiv, als eine Befähigung, als Erwartung, attributive Haltung, Neigung oder als Interesse aufgefaßt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abramowitz, S.I. & Abramowitz, C.V. (1974). Psychological-mindedness and benefit from insight-oriented group therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 610–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 3rd ed. ). APA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnions, R.B. & Ammons, C.H. (1962). The Quick-Test: Provisional manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S.A. (1973). Psychological mindedness: Word, concept, and essence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 54, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagby, R.M., Taylor, G.J. & Ryan, D. (1986). Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Relationship with personality and psychopathology measures. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 45, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, S. (1979). Assessment of patients for psychotherapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, H.R., Plutchik, R., Jung, B.B., Picard, S., Karasu, T.B. & Lotterman, A. (1990). Psychological mindedness as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome: A preliminary report.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 31, 426–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L.R. (1977). SCL-90 administration, scoring and procedures manual 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, S.J., Reader, M.J., Mamett, J.P. & Tylenda, B. (1983). Psychological mindedness, psychological construing, and the judgement of deception. The Journal of General Psychology, 100, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, B.A. (1989). Psychological-mindedness: Can there be too much of a good thing? Psychotherapy, 26, 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M.F. & Buss, A.H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: As-sessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G. (1957). California Psychological Inventory. Consulting Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1992). Psychological-mindedness: A conceptual model. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L.M., Rosenberg, S.E. & Kalehzan, B.M. (1992). The capacity to describe other people clearly: A predictor of interpersonal problems in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D.M. (1974). Personality research form manual. Research Psychologist’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemberg, O.F., Burstein, E., Coyne, L., Appelbaum, H., Horwitz, L. & Voth, H. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: Final report of the Menninger Foundation’ s psychotherapy research project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 36, 1–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Mintz, J., Auerbach, A.H., Christoph, P., Bachrach, H., Todd, T., Johnson, M., Cohen, M. & O’ Brien, P. (1980). Predicting the outcome of psychotherapy: Findings of the Penn Psychotherapy Project. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, M. & Piper, W.E. (1987). Manual for the Psychological Mindedness Assessment Procedure. Unpublished manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, M. & Piper, W.E. (1990a). The psychological mindedness assessment procedure. Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, M. & Piper, W.E. (1990b). A controlled study of effectiveness and patient suitability for short-term group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 40, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E., Debbane, E.G., Bienvenu, J.P. & Garant, J. (1984). A comparative study of four forms of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E. & McCallum, M. (1988). Manual for the Psychodynamic Work and Object Rating System. Unpublished manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E. & McCallum, M. (1990). Psychodynamische Arbeit als ein therapeutischer Faktor in der Gruppenpsychotherapie. In Tschuschke, V. & Czogalik, D. (Eds.), Psychotherapie — Welche Effekte verändern? Zur Frage der Wirkfaktoren therapeutischer Prozesse. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E., McCallum, M. & Azim, H.F.A. (1992). Adaptation to loss through short-term group therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E., Rosie, J.S., Azim, H.F.A. & Joyce, A.S. (1993). A randomized trial of psychiatric day treatment for patients with affective and personality disorders. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 757–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, R.L. & Horowitz, M.J. (1983). Motivation for psychotherapy: A factorial and conceptual analysis. Psychological Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, E.R. & Cicchetti, D.V. (1985). Predicting quality of alliance in the initial psychotherapy interview. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolor, A., Reznikoff, M. (1960). A new approach to insight: A preliminary report. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 130–286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V. (1996). Das „Psychological Mindedness-Einschätzungsverfahren“ (PMAP). Unveröff. Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, R.L., Sandler, J. (1971). Problems in the selection of patients for psychoanalysis: Comments on the application of the concepts of „indications“, „suitability“ and „analysability“. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 44, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolitzky, D.L. & Reuben, R. (1974). Psychological-mindedness. Journal of Clinical Psychology 3026–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCallum, M., Piper, W.E. (1996). Psychological Mindedness Assessment Procedure (PMAP). In: Strauß, B., Eckert, J., Tschuschke, V. (eds) Methoden der empirischen Gruppentherapieforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10786-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10786-6_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-10786-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics