Advertisement

Devolution of Government in the Ex-Communist Countries: Some Explanatory Frameworks

Chapter
Part of the Urban Research International book series (URI, volume 2)

Abstract

In the majority of countries existing presently on the territory of the former Soviet bloc, the new political establishments that came to power after 1989 declared their intention to launch democratic reforms. Part and parcel of such programmatic declarations were plans to decentralize or, at least, to de-concentrate government to sub-national territorial units. Decentralization reforms of some kind were then actually launched in many of those countries, with varying degree of determination and success.

Keywords

Political Culture Explanatory Framework Communist Country Candidate Country East Central 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamski, Wlodzimierz; Bunbak, Jan; Machonin, Pavel, and Dominique Martin, 1999: System Change and Modernization. Warsaw: IFIS Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Andorka, Rudolf, 1993: The Socialist System and its Collapse in Hungary: An Interpreta- tion in Terms of Modernization Theory. In: International Sociology, 8, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. Baldersheim, Harald; Illner, Michal; Offerdal, Audun; Rose, Lawrence, and Swianiewicz, Pawel (eds.), 1996: Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: WestviewPress, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Baldersheim, Harald and Michal Illner, 1996: Local Democracy: The Challenge of Institution-Building. In: Baldersheim, Harald et al. (eds.), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. Bennet, Robert J. (ed.), 1993: Local Government in the New Europe. London and New York: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  6. Breska, Erich von and Brusis, Martin (eds.), 1999: Central and Eastern Europe on the Way into the European Union: Reforms of Regional Administration in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Munich: Center for Applied Policy Research.Google Scholar
  7. Brusis, Martin, 1999: Re-creating the regional level in Central and Eastern Europe: An analysis of administrative reforms in six countries. In: Breska, Erich von and Brusis, Martin (eds.), op. cit., pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  8. Committee of the Regions, 1999a: Resolution on “the ongoing EU enlargement process.” Bruxelles: European Union — Committee of the Regions.Google Scholar
  9. Committee of the Regions, 1999b: Preparing for the EU enlargement. Devolution in the first wave candidate countries. Luxembourg: European Communities, COR Studies E4 /99.Google Scholar
  10. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, 2000: Local and Regional Democracy in the Czech Republic. Explanatory Memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Coulson, A. (ed.), 1995: Local Government in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Dahrendorf, Ralf, 1990: Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. London: Chatto Windus. Elster, Jon; Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K., 1998: Institutional Design in Post-communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission, 1997: Agenda 2000 for a Stronger Union. Bulletin of the European Union. Supplement 5 /1997.Google Scholar
  13. Hesse, Jens J. (ed.), 1993: Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hesse, Jens J. (ed.), 1995: Rebuilding the State: Public Sector Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  15. Habermass, Jürgen, 1990: Die nachholende Revolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Horvath, Tamas (ed.), 2000: Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Volume I. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
  16. Illner, Michal, 1996: Post-Communist Transformation Revisited. In: Czech Sociological Review 4, 2, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
  17. Illner, Michal, 1997a: The territorial dimension of public administration reforms in East Central Europe. Prague: Institute of Sociology CZAS.Google Scholar
  18. Illner, Michal, 1997b: Territorial Decentralization — a Stumbling Block of Democratic Re- forms in East-Central Europe. In: Polish Sociological Review, I(117)’97, pp 23–45.Google Scholar
  19. Jalowiecki, Bohdan, 1990: Narodziny demokracji w Polsce lokalnej (The Birth of Democracy in the Local Poland). Warsaw: The University of Warsaw — Institute for Space Economy.Google Scholar
  20. Kaminski, A. and Kurzewska, Joanna, 1995: Strategies of Post-communist Transformations in Poland: Elites as Institution Builders. In: B. Grancelli (ed.): Social Change and Modernization. Lessons from Eastern Europe. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 131–152.Google Scholar
  21. Kimball, Jonathan (ed.), 1999: The Transfer of Power. Decentralization in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative.Google Scholar
  22. Kirchner, Emil J. (ed.), 1999: Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Poland, Hungary, The Czech Republic and Slovakia. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd., New York: St. Martin’s Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Kirchner, Emil J. (ed.), 1999: The Role of EU in Local and Regional Development. In: Kirchner, Emil (ed.), op. cited, pp. 208–222.Google Scholar
  24. Kosteleckÿ, TomaI, 1994: Economic, Social and Historical Determinants of Voting Patterns. In: Czech Sociological Review (1994)2, pp. 209–228.Google Scholar
  25. Krivÿ, Vladimir; Feglovâ, Viera, and Balko, Daniel, 1996: Slovensko a jeho regiony (Slovakia and its regions). Bratislava: Nadâcia Média.Google Scholar
  26. Kuklinski, Antoni, 1998: Regional Policy and the Information Society. Paper presented at the Third EU/CEEC Forum on the Information Society.Google Scholar
  27. Machonin, Pavel, 1996: Modernization and Social Transformation in the Czech Republic. In: Czech Sociological Review (1996)4, pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
  28. Machonin, Pave1,1997: System Change and Modernization. Prague: SLON.Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, J., 1996: Democracy, Capitalism and the End of Transition. In: M. Mandelbaum (ed.): Post-Communism: Four Perspectives. New: York: A Council on Foreign Relations Book 1996, pp. 102–167.Google Scholar
  30. Mueller, Klaus, 1999: Sequenztheorien der postkommunistischen Transformation. In: Politik und Gesellschaft,(1999)1.Google Scholar
  31. OECD-CCET, 1996: Transition at the Local Level. The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the Slovak Republic. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. Offe, Claus, 1991: Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in Eastern Central Europe. In: Social Research 58 (1991)4, pp. 866892.Google Scholar
  33. Putnam, Robert D., 1993: Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, Lawrence; Buchta, Stanislav; Gajduschek, Gyorgy; Grochowski, Miroslaw, and Ondtej Hubd6ek, 1996: Political Culture and Citizen Involvement. In: Baldersheim, Harald et al (eds.): Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: WestviewPress, Inc., pp. 43–104.Google Scholar
  35. Schmitter, Philippe C. and Guilhot, Nicolas, 2000: From Transition to Consolidation. In: Dobry, Michel (ed.): Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe. Dordreacht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SIGMA, 1995: Public Management Profiles. SIGMA Countries. Revised Edition. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Stark, David, 1992: Path Dependency and Privatization Strategies in Eastern-Central Europe. In: Eastern European Politics and Societies (1992)6, pp. 17–51.Google Scholar
  38. Surazska, Wisla, 1996: Theoretical perspectives on Central Europe. In: Czech Sociological Review (1996)4, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  39. Sztompka, Piotr, 1993: Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies. In: Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie (1993)22, pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
  40. Wasilewski, Jacek, 1998: Elite Circulation and Consolidation of Democracy in Poland. In: Highley, John, Jan Pakulski and Wlodzimierz Wesolowski (eds.): Postcommunist Elites and Democracy in Eastern Europe. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd., New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., pp. 163–187.Google Scholar
  41. Verheijen, Tony; Sirotkin, Sergei, and Kozdkovl, Anastasia, 2001: Government in Central Asia. Tendencies, Achievements and Failures. In: Local Government Brief, Summer 2001, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  42. Wollmann, Hellmut (Hrsg.), 1994: Systemwandel und Städtebau in Mittel-und Osteuropa. Basel: Birkenhauser.Google Scholar
  43. Wollmann, Hellmut, 1995: Variationen institutioneller Transformation in sozialistischen Laendern: Die (Wieder-) Einfuehrung der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung in Ostdeutschland, Ungarn, Polen und Russland. In: Wollmann, Hellmut, H. Wiesenthal and F. Bönker (eds.): Transformation sozialistischer Gesellschaften. Am Ende des Anfangs. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 554–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wollmann, Hellmut, 1996: The Transformation of Local Government in East Germany: Between Imposed and Innovative Institutionalization. In: Benz, Arthur and Klaus H. Goetz (eds.): A New German Public Sector? Aldershot, etc.: Dartmouth Publishing Co., pp. 137–163.Google Scholar
  45. Wollmann, Hellmut, 1997a: Between Institutional Transfer and Legacies: Local Administrative Transformation in Eastern Germany. In: Grabner, Gernot and David Stark (eds.): Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 324–342.Google Scholar
  46. Wollmann, Hellmut, 1997b: Institution Building and Decentralization in Formerly Socialist Countries: the Cases of Poland, Hungary, and East Germany. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 15, pp. 463–480.Google Scholar
  47. Zapf, Wolfgang, 1994: Modernisierung, Wohlfahrtsentwicklung und Transformation: Soziologische Aufsätze 1987–1994. Berlin: Seismo Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations