Advertisement

Learning across borders: The international contacts of municipalities

Chapter
  • 72 Downloads
Part of the Urban Research International book series (URI, volume 2)

Abstract

The age of internationalisation has also reached local government. Leaders of local authorities are increasingly in touch with their opposite numbers in other countries. The cross-border networks between cities, towns and regions seem to grow denser day by day (Goldsmith and Klausen 1997, Baldersheim and Ståhlberg 1999a). East and Central European mayors are very much a part of this trend. However, not all municipalities and mayors are equally involved in this pattern of cross-border networking. To the extent that important information, economic resources, or strategic advantages flow from membership of such networks, those who cannot or will not take part may be disadvantaged.

Keywords

Czech Republic Political Culture Pull Factor Push Factor International Contact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D., 1976: Organizational Learning. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Baldersheim, H. and Stahlberg, K. (eds.), 1999a: Nordic Region-Building in a European Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Baldersheim, H. and Stahlberg, K., 1999b: The Internationalisation of Finnish and Norwegian Local Government. In: H. Baldersheim and K. Stahlberg (eds.): Nordic Region-Building in a European Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 121 – 150.Google Scholar
  3. Baldersheim, H., Illner, M., Offerdal, A., Rose, L., and Swianiewicz, P. (eds.), 1996: Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baldersheim, H., Blaas, G., Horvath, T. M., Illner, M., and Swianiewicz, P., 1996: New Institutions of Local Government. A Comparison. In: H. Baldersheim, M. Illner, A. Offerdal, L. Rose and P. Swianiewicz (eds.): Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press, pp. 23 – 42.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, T. N. and Hoffmann-Martinot, V. (eds.), 1998: The New Political Culture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, T. N. and Ferguson, L., 1983: City Money. NY: Columbia university Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., 1963: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Goldsmith, M. J. F. and Klausen, K. K. (eds.), 1997: European Integration and Local Government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Levitt, B. and March, J. G., 1988: Organizational Learning. In: Annual Review of Sociology, 14 (1988), pp. 319 – 340.Google Scholar
  10. Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Ray, L., and Salk, J., 1996: Commmpetencies, Cracks, and Conflicts: Regional Mobilization in the European Union. Chapter 3. In: G. Marks, F. W. Scharpf, P. C. Schmitter and W. S. Streck (eds.): Governance in the European Union. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, pp. 40 – 63.Google Scholar
  11. Putnam, R., 1993: Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Surazska, W., 1997: Balu burmistra. Warsaw: Rzeczpospolita.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations