Abstract
The increasing number of elderly people as well as their increasing proportion present a challenge for most modern societies (cf. Kohli 1989), especially with respect to the cost of pension and health care systems. The aging of populations is mainly caused by a decline in the average number of children within families. Additionally, people — on average — are living longer than ever before. This leads to family structures recently described as “beanpole families” (Giarrusso, Silverstein & Bengtson 1996), i.e. families “with strikingly similar numbers in each age category starting from children and adolescents through those above the age of 60” (Bengtson 2001: 5). More dramatic prospects even assume a development towards a reversed pyramid or funnel structure, where — in the case of a divorce — four or more grandparents try to care for one single grandchild. The impact of these changes in family structure on family solidarity — and especially on support for the aged parents — is therefore another very important question in the context of the aging of populations. Do those with one single child receive less support in old age? Or does this simply mean heavier responsibility for these “Single children”? Is there a decline in family solidarity in general? And what about the role of the state in the public-private mix of old age care — are there new demands and additional costs to await?
We would like to thank Martin Kohli for his influential — although at times hidden — contributions to this paper. He has an unfailing intuition for a good question and a critical eye for whether the evidence supports the claims we make.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Attias-Donfut, C. (1995): Le double circuit des transmissions. In: Attias-Donfut, C. (éd.): Les solidarités entre générations. Vieillesse, familles, État. Paris: Nathan: 41–81
Attias-Donfut, C. (2000): Familialer Austausch und soziale Sicherung. In: Kohli, Martin & Marc Szydlik (Hrsg.): Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich: 222–237
Attias-Donfut, C./Wolff, F. C. (2000): Complementary between private and public transfers. In: Arber, S. & C. Attias-Donfut (eds.): The myth of generational conflict: Family and state in ageing societies. London: Routledge: 47–68
Bengtson, V. L. (2001): Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. In: Journal of Marriage and Family 63: 1–16
Cantor, M. H. (1979): Neighbors and friends: An overlooked resource in the informal support system. In: Research on Aging 1: 434–463
Cantor, M. H. (1991): Family and community: Changing roles in an aging society. The Gerontologist 31, 337–346
DeMaris, A. (1992): Logit modelling. Newbury Park: Sage.
Dittmann-Kohli, F./Kohli, M./Künemund, H./Motel, A./Steinleitner, C./Westerhof, G. J. in Zusammenarbeit mit infas Sozialforschung (1997): Lebenszusammenhänge, Selbst-und Lebenskonzeptionen — Erhebungsdesign und Instrumente des Alters-Survey. Forschungsgruppe Altern und Lebenslauf (FALL), Forschungsbericht 61. Berlin: Freie Universität
Doty, P. (1986): Family care of the elderly: The role of public policy. In: Milbank Quarterly 64: 35–75
Dwyer, J. W./Coward, R. T. (1991): A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. In: Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 46: 259–269
Eggebeen, D. J./Wilhelm, M. O. (1995): Patterns of support given by older Americans to their children. In: Bass, Scott A. (ed.): Older and active: How Americans over 55 are contributing to society. New Haven: Yale University Press: 122–168
Ganzeboom, H. B./De Graaf, P. M./Treiman, D. J. (1992): A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. In: Social Science Research 21: 1–56
Giarrusso, R./Silverstein, M./Bengtson, V. L. (1996): Family complexity and the grandparent role. In: Generations 20: 17–23
Finch, J. (1989): Family obligations and social change. Oxford: Polity Press
Finch, J./Mason, J. (1993): Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge
Hoffmann-Nowotny, H.-J. (1988): Ehe und Familie in der modernen Gesellschaft. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B13 /88: 3–13
Kohli, M. (1989): Das Altern der Gesellschaft: Demographische Grundlagen. In: Baltes, M. M./Kohli M./Samen, K.: Erfolgreiches Altern. Bedingungen und Variationen. Bern: Huber: 36–41
Kohli, M. (1993): Public solidarity between generations: Historical and comparative elements. Forschungsgruppe Altern und Lebenslauf (FALL), Forschungsbericht 39. Berlin: Freie Universität.
Kohli, M. (1999): Private and public transfers between generations: Linking the family and the state. In: European Societies, 1: 81–104.
Kohli, M./Künemund H. (2000): Die zweite Lebenshälfte — Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey. Opladen: Leske + Budrich
Kohli, M./Künemund, H./Motel, A./Szydlik, M. (1997): Generationenkonstellationen, Haushaltsstrukturen und Wohnentfernungen in der zweiten Lebenshälfte. In: Becker, R. (Hrsg.): Generationen und sozialer Wandel. Generationendynamik, Generationenbeziehungen und Differenzierung von Generationen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich: 157–175
Kohli, M./Künemund, H./Motel, A./Szydlik, M. (2000a): Families apart? Intergenerational transfers in East and West Germany. In: Arber, S./Attias-Donfut, C. (eds.): The myth of generational conflict: Family and state in ageing societies. London: Routledge: 88–99
Kohli, M./Künemund, H./Motel, A./Szydlik, M. (2000b): Grunddaten zur Lebenssituation der 40–85jährigen deutschen Bevölkerung. Ergebnisse des Alters-Survey. Berlin: Weißensee-Verlag
Kohli, M./Rein, M./Guillemard, A. M./Van Gunsteren, H. (1991): Time for retirement. Comparative studies of early exit from the labor force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Konrad, K./Künemund, H./Lommerud, K. E./Robledo, J. (2002): Geography of the family. In: American Economic Review (forthcoming)
Kreps, J. M. (1977): Intergenerational transfers and the bureaucracy. In: Shanas, E./Sussman, M. B. (eds): Family, bureaucracy and the elderly. Durham: Duke University Press: 21–34
Künemund, H. (2000): Pflegetätigkeiten in der zweiten Lebenshälfte — Verbreitung und Perspektiven. In: Clemens, W./Backes, G. M. (Hrsg.): Lebenslagen im Alter. Gesellschaftliche Bedingungen und Grenzen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich: 215–229
Künemund, H./Hollstein, B. (2000): Soziale Beziehungen und Unterstützungsnetzwerke. In: Kohli, MIKünemund, H.: Die zweite Lebenshälfte — Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey. Opladen: Leske + Budrich: 212–276
Künemund, H./Motel, A. (2000): Verbreitung, Motivation und Entwicklungsperspektiven privater intergenerationeller Hilfeleistungen und Transfers. In: Kohli, M./Szydlik, M.: Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich: 122–137
Künemund, H./Rein, M. (1999): There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. In: Ageing and Society 19: 93–121
Lye, D. N. (1996): Adult child-parent relationships. In: Annual Review of Sociology 22: 79–102
Qureshi, H. (1990): A research note on the hierarchy of obligations among informal carers — a response to Finch and Mason. In: Ageing and Society 10, 455–458
Rainwater, L. (1960): And the poor get children. Sex, contraception, and family planning in the working class. Chicago: Quadrangle Books
Rein, M. (1994): Intergenerationale Solidarität. Eine Fünfländerstudie über den sozialen Prozeß des Alterns. In: Evers, A./Leichsenring, K./Marin, B. (Hrsg.): Die Zukunft des Alterns. Sozialpolitik für das Dritte Lebensalter. Wien: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, 77–111
Szydlik, M. (2000): Lebenslange Solidarität? Generationenbeziehungen zwischen erwachsenen Kindern und Eltern. Opladen: Leske + Budrich
Wenger, C. G./Scott, A./Patterson, N. (2000): How important is parenthood? Childlessness and support in old age in England. Ageing and Society, 20: 161–182
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Künemund, H., Rein, M. (2002). Intergenerational relations and family size: Do siblings matter?. In: Burkart, G., Wolf, J. (eds) Lebenszeiten. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10626-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10626-5_10
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-663-10627-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-10626-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive