Abstract
To describe the American public’s political ideology, previous research has used two methods of classification: self-designation and classification based on policy preferences. These two methods produce different results; typically, more Americans self-classify as “conservative” than would be expected based on their issue opinions (Conover/Feldman 1981). But this blurred picture of American political ideology may have changed. Alterations in the American political environment in the 1980s are said to have clarified the meaning of ideological positions for the American voter. The partisan reconfiguration of the “Solid South,” the emergence of candidates who campaign in order to satisfy their electoral base among party activists, and the widening of the ideological gulf between the parties in Congress have clarified the meaning of ideological labels (Hetherington 2001). The sharpening of elite ideological divisions means that more Americans may think of their politics in ideological terms. Ideological self-designation has become more meaningful; it is more closely linked to individuals’ social and economic place in the American polity, and more reflective of their issue preferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramowitz, Alan I./Saunders, Kyle L. 1998: “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate,” in: Journal of Politics 60, 634–52.
Conover, Pamela J./Feldman, S. 1981: “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self- Identifications,” in: American Journal of Political Science 25, 617–45.
Converse, Philip E. 1964: “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in: David E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1983: Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fleishman, J. A. 1986: “Trends in Self-Identified Ideology from 1972 to 1982: No Support for the Salience Hypothesis,” in: American Journal of Political Science 30, 517–541.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001: “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization,” in: American Political Science Review 95, 619–33.
Jackman, Simon/Sniderman, Paul M. 1999: “The Institutional Organization of Choice Space: A Political Conception of Political Psychology,” Manuscript.
Jacoby, William G. 1991: “Ideological Identification and Issue Attitudes,” in: American Journal of Political Science 35, 178–205.
Lawless, Jennifer L./Fox, Richard L. 2001: “Political Participation Among the Urban Poor,” in: Social Problems 48, 362–85.
Luskin, Robert C. 1987: “Measuring Political Sophistication,” in: American Journal of Political Science 31, 856–99.
Luskin, Robert C. 1990: “Explaining Political Sophistication,” in: Political Behavior 12, 331–61.
Luskin, Robert C. 2002: “From Denial to Extenuation (and Finally Beyond): Political Sophistication and Citizen Performance,” in: James H. Kuklinski (ed.), Thinking about Political Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 281–305.
MacKuen, Michael 2002: “Political Psychology and the Micro-Macro Gap in Politics,” in: James H. Kuklinski (ed.), Thinking about Political Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 306–338.
Nie, Norman H./Junn, Jane/Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth 1996: Education and Democratic Citizenship in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994: The Reasoning Voter, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schiffer, Adam J. 2000: “I’m Not That Liberal: Explaining Conservative Democratic Identification,” in: Political Behavior 22, 293–310.
Sniderman, Paul M. 1993: “The New Look in Public Opinion Research,” in: Ada W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 219–245.
Sniderman, Paul M./Brody, Richard A./Tetlock, Philip E. 1991: Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Soss, Joe 1999: “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action,” in: American Political Science Review 93, 363–80.
Tate, Katherine 1994: From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Zaller, John R. 1992: The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brody, R.A., Lawless, J.L. (2003). Political Ideology in the United States: Conservatism and Liberalism in the 1980s and 1990s. In: Schultze, RO., Sturm, R., Eberle, D. (eds) Conservative Parties and Right-Wing Politics in North America. Politikwissenschaftliche Paperbacks, vol 36. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09508-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09508-8_3
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3812-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-09508-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive