Skip to main content

The Five Decades of the United Nations: Accomplishments and Limitations

  • Chapter
Agenda for Change

Abstract

The turbulent 20th century is approaching its end. Its last decade is the third major watershed of international relations since 1900. Although the present era is defined as the post-Cold War period, it is understood that there is not yet a ‘new order’ in place with widely shared values and clearly identifiable regulating forces in all important areas of the global system. Instead, this era represents more of a transition period, or a strange interregnum period of turbulence where, the few positive forces notwithstanding, a great diversity of morbid symptoms are appearing.1 The ultimate test of this era will be in coming decades, in the positive results and benefits it delivers to the world. The proper global management of the transition is a collective task for all nations. The international institutions and „co-operation regimes“ which are countries’ most important collective instruments are the results of the post-Second World War era.

„ The structure of world peace cannot be a peace of large nations or of small nations. It must be a peace which rests on the co-operative effort of the whole world.“

(Franklin D. Roosevelt)

„ We cannot claim that our work is perfect or that we have created an unbreakable guaranty of peace. But we have, I am convinced, forged an instrument by which, if men are serious in wanting peace and are ready to make sacrifices for it, they may find means to win it.“

Lord Halifax in San Francisco)

„A war postponed may be a war averted.“

(Winston Churchill)

„It is a matter of will and wallet.“

(George Bush)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Rosenau, James R.: Turbulence in World Politics, A Theory of Change and Continuity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990, 480 p.; and Booth, Ken: Security and Emancipation. In: Review of International Studies 17/4, 1991, pp. 314–315.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, Richard N.: The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. In: The Washington Quarterly, Summer 1990, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, Lynn H.: Global Order. Values and Power in International Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See in details, Russel, Ruth E.: A History of the United Nations Charter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregg, Robert W.: International Economic Co-operation and Development: The United Nations in Search for a Role. Atlanta: I.S.A. Conference Paper, 1984, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A very interesting analysis of problem has been offered in another context by Perrow, Charles: Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basin Books, 1984, 386 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See the Special Survey in: The Economist, October 12,1991, p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An interesting reference to this phenomenon concerning the United States in the first half of the 1980s was made by an American expert who noted that the lack of experienced professionals in key roles was a particular handicap to the United States in those years. See Finger, Seymour Maxwell: Jeane Kirkpatrick at the United Nations. In: Foreign Affairs 62/2, 1983, pp. 445–447. The United States, however, was not the only country in a similar position.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In 1953 a concession was made to the United States government in relation to American UN staff members. They organised the clearance-hearings on the premises of the United Nations, and U.S. citizens from the UN staff who refused to testify before a United States Federal Grand Jury were dismissed. This practice was later abandoned due to pressure on the US government.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bertrand, Maurice: Some Reflections on Reform of the United Nations. Geneva: UN, 1985, pp. 12–13 (JIU/REP/85/9).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Finger, Seymour Maxwell; Hanan, Nina: The United Nations Secretariat Revisited. In: Orbis 25/1, Spring 1981, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, The United States and the United Nations: A Balance Sheet, Backgrounder Report. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, January 21, 1982, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Klaus Hüfner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simai, M. (1995). The Five Decades of the United Nations: Accomplishments and Limitations. In: Hüfner, K. (eds) Agenda for Change. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09225-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09225-4_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-663-09227-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-09225-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics