Abstract
The first lines of Talcott Parsons’ The Structure of Social Action (1937) are indicative of perennial problems in sociology. They concern the relationship between innovation and continuity in the development of sociological knowledge. Parsons’ rhetorical question, “Who now reads Spencer?” was borrowed from Crane Brinton to signal a disciplinary paradigm shift. The message was that Spencer’s sociological evolutionism had become scientifically worthless. More precisely, Parsons believed that it had been made worthless because of the appearance of the modern theory of social action. It consisted mostly in elaborations on the ideas of Max Weber. Thus, the answer was obvious for Parsons: nobody used to read Spencer at the end of the thirties of the last century. Parsons’ background assumption was that sociological evolutionism was dead forever. Sociologists used to read or had to read the new theory of social action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrow, Martin (1996) The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Albrow, Martin and Elizabeth King. Eds. (1990) Globalization, Knowledge and Society. London: Sage.
Bauman, Zigmunt (1998) Globalisation. The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Beck, Ulrich (1997) Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus. Antworten auf Globalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Becker, Egon and Thomas Jahn. Eds. (1999) Sustainability and the Social Sciences. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations into Theoretical Reorientation. London and New York: Zed Books.
Bell, Daniel (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Blau, Peter (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Blumer, Herbert (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Bornschier, Volker (2002) Weltgesellschaft. Grundlegende soziale Wandlungen. Zürich: Loreto-Verlag.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Editions du Seuil (1994).
Brundtland, Gro Harlem et al. (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castells, Manuel (1999) End of Millenium. Oxford: Blackwell.
Coleman, James (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Collins, Randall (1975) Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.
Coser, Louis (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dahrendorf, Ralf (1964) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Deutsch, Karl W., Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. (1986) Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America.
Deutsch, Karl W. (1986) `What Do We Mean by Advances in the Social Sciences?’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 1–12.
Eisenstadt, Samuel (1986) –Current Theoretical Developments, Research and Controversies in Sociology’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 37–49.
Eisenstadt, Samuel N. and Maria Curelaru (1976) The Form of Sociology — Paradigms and Crises. New York: Wiley.
Eldridge, John, John Maclnnes, Sue Scott, Chris Warhurst and Anne Witz. Eds. (2000) For Sociology: Legacies and Prospects, Durham: Sociologypress.
Featherstone, Mike, Scott Lash and Roland Robertson. Eds. (1995) Global Modernities. London: Sage.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Genov, Nikolai. Ed. (1989) National Traditions in Sociology. London: Sage
Genov, Nikolai. Ed. (1991) Internationalization of Sociology. Special Issue of Current Sociology,Spring.
Genov, Nikolai (1999) Managing Transformations in Eastern Europe. Paris and Sofia: UNESCO/MOST and REG LO.
Giddens, Anthony (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Godelier, Maurice (1973) Horizons. Tarjets Marxists en Anthropologies. Paris: Maspero.
Gouldner, Alvin (1971) The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.
Gouldner, Alvin (1973) For Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Homans, George C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Habermas, Jürgen (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, Jürgen and Niklas Luhmann (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leistet die Systemforschung. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
Inkeles, Alex (1986) ‘Advances in Sociology — A Critique’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences,1900–1980. What,Who,Where,How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 13–31.
Joas, Hans (1992) Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Joas, Hans (1997) Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Levi-Strauss, Claude (1958) Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.
Luhmann, Niklas (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2 Bände.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1979) La condition postmoderne. Paris: Edition de Minuit.
Merton, Robert K. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure: Toward the Configuration of Theory and Research. Rev. and enl. ed. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Mills, Charles Wright (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, Charles Wright (1959) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mouzelis, Nicos (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? London and New York: Routledge.
Münch, Richard (1982) Theorie des Handelns. Zur Rekonstruktion der Beiträge von Tal-cott Parsons, Emile Durkheim und Max Weber. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Nisbet, Robert A (1966) The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.
Parsons, Talcott (1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.
Parsons, Talcott (1951) The Social System. London: Routledge & Paul.
Parsons, Talcott (1966) Societies. Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Parsons, Talcott (1971) The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smelser, Neil J. (1959) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Tomasi, Luigi. Ed. (2001) New Horizons in Sociological Theory and Research. Aldershot etc.: Ashgate.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974–1988) The Modern World System. Vol.1 1974; Vol. II 1984; Vol.111 1988. New York: Academic Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Genov, N. (2004). Breakthroughs, Fashions and Continuity in Developing Sociological Knowledge. In: Genov, N. (eds) Advances in Sociological Knowledge. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_1
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-4012-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-09215-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive