Skip to main content

Breakthroughs, Fashions and Continuity in Developing Sociological Knowledge

  • Chapter
Advances in Sociological Knowledge
  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

The first lines of Talcott Parsons’ The Structure of Social Action (1937) are indicative of perennial problems in sociology. They concern the relationship between innovation and continuity in the development of sociological knowledge. Parsons’ rhetorical question, “Who now reads Spencer?” was borrowed from Crane Brinton to signal a disciplinary paradigm shift. The message was that Spencer’s sociological evolutionism had become scientifically worthless. More precisely, Parsons believed that it had been made worthless because of the appearance of the modern theory of social action. It consisted mostly in elaborations on the ideas of Max Weber. Thus, the answer was obvious for Parsons: nobody used to read Spencer at the end of the thirties of the last century. Parsons’ background assumption was that sociological evolutionism was dead forever. Sociologists used to read or had to read the new theory of social action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albrow, Martin (1996) The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrow, Martin and Elizabeth King. Eds. (1990) Globalization, Knowledge and Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zigmunt (1998) Globalisation. The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich (1997) Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus. Antworten auf Globalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Egon and Thomas Jahn. Eds. (1999) Sustainability and the Social Sciences. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations into Theoretical Reorientation. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornschier, Volker (2002) Weltgesellschaft. Grundlegende soziale Wandlungen. Zürich: Loreto-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Editions du Seuil (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, Gro Harlem et al. (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (1999) End of Millenium. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall (1975) Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Louis (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dahrendorf, Ralf (1964) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Karl W., Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. (1986) Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Karl W. (1986) `What Do We Mean by Advances in the Social Sciences?’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Samuel (1986) –Current Theoretical Developments, Research and Controversies in Sociology’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. What, Who, Where, How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Samuel N. and Maria Curelaru (1976) The Form of Sociology — Paradigms and Crises. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, John, John Maclnnes, Sue Scott, Chris Warhurst and Anne Witz. Eds. (2000) For Sociology: Legacies and Prospects, Durham: Sociologypress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Mike, Scott Lash and Roland Robertson. Eds. (1995) Global Modernities. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genov, Nikolai. Ed. (1989) National Traditions in Sociology. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Genov, Nikolai. Ed. (1991) Internationalization of Sociology. Special Issue of Current Sociology,Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genov, Nikolai (1999) Managing Transformations in Eastern Europe. Paris and Sofia: UNESCO/MOST and REG LO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, Maurice (1973) Horizons. Tarjets Marxists en Anthropologies. Paris: Maspero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin (1971) The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin (1973) For Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen and Niklas Luhmann (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leistet die Systemforschung. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, Alex (1986) ‘Advances in Sociology — A Critique’. In: Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits and John Platt. Eds. Advances in the Social Sciences,1900–1980. What,Who,Where,How?. Lanham and London: University Press of America, pp. 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans (1992) Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans (1997) Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, Claude (1958) Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2 Bände.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1979) La condition postmoderne. Paris: Edition de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure: Toward the Configuration of Theory and Research. Rev. and enl. ed. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles Wright (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles Wright (1959) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, Nicos (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, Richard (1982) Theorie des Handelns. Zur Rekonstruktion der Beiträge von Tal-cott Parsons, Emile Durkheim und Max Weber. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert A (1966) The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1951) The Social System. London: Routledge & Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1966) Societies. Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1971) The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. (1959) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasi, Luigi. Ed. (2001) New Horizons in Sociological Theory and Research. Aldershot etc.: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974–1988) The Modern World System. Vol.1 1974; Vol. II 1984; Vol.111 1988. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Genov, N. (2004). Breakthroughs, Fashions and Continuity in Developing Sociological Knowledge. In: Genov, N. (eds) Advances in Sociological Knowledge. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_1

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-4012-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-09215-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics