Advertisement

Literaturverzeichnis

Chapter
  • 38 Downloads
Part of the Psycholinguistische Studien book series (PLS)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Achinstein, P. (1968). Concepts of Science. Baltimore, ML: Hopkins.Google Scholar
  2. Akmajian, A., Demers, R.A., Farmer, A.K. and Harnish, R.M. (1990). Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3. Aufl.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, Memory and Thought Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baars, B.J. (1980). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In: Fromkin, V.A. (Eds.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand (S. 307–318 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baars, B.J., Motley, M.T. and MacKay, D.G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, T. (1987). The case against accommodation: Evidence from German speech error data. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg, T. (1988). Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem AktivationsfuBmodell. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, T. (1992a). Productive and perceptual constraints on speech-error correction. Psychological Research 54, 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg, T. (19926). Phonological harmony as a processing problem. Journal of Child Language 19, 225–257.Google Scholar
  11. Berg, T. Si Schade, U. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production. Part 1: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycho-linguistic Research 21, 405–434.Google Scholar
  12. Berndt, R.S. (1990). Preface. In: Menn, L. and Obler, L.K. (Eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook (S. xxv-xxvii). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., Grimm, H.,Marshall, J.C. and Wallesch, C.-W. (Eds.) (1993). Linguistic Disorders and Pathologies (= Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, Vol. 8). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Bloch, D.E. (1986). Defining the Speech Production Impairment in a case of Wernicke’s Neologistic Jargonaphasia: A Speech Error Analysis. Unveröffentlichte Dissertationsschrift. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  15. Bock, J.K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bock, J.K. (1991). A sketchbook of production problems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bock, J.K., Loebell, H. and Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review 99, 150–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, R. and McNeill, D. (1966). The “Tip of the Tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckingham, H.W. (1980). On correlating aphasic errors with slips of the tongue. Applied Psycholinguistics 1, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buckingham, H.W. (1986). The scan-copier mechanism and the positional level of lan- guage production: Evidence from phonemic paraphasia. Cognitive Science 10, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buckingham, H.W. and Kertesz, A. (1976). Neologistic Jargon Aphasia (= Neurolinguistics, Bd. 3 ). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
  22. Burke, D.M., MacKay, D.G., Worthley, J.S. and Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language 30, 542–579.Google Scholar
  23. Butterworth, B. (1979). Hesitations and the production of verbal paraphasia and neologisms in jargon aphasia. Brain and Language 8, 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Butterworth, B. (1980). Some constraints on models of language production. In: Butterworth, B. (Eds.), Language Production, Vol. 1 (S. 423–459 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Butterworth, B. (1985). Jargon aphasia: Processes and strategies. In: Newman, S. and Epstein, R. (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (S. 61–96 ). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  26. Butterworth, B. and Howard, D. (1987). Paragrammatisms. Cognition 26, 1–37.Google Scholar
  27. Butterworth, B., Howard, D. and McLoughlin, P. (1984). The semantic deficit in aphasia: The relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming. Neuropsychologia 22, 409–426.Google Scholar
  28. Bybee, J.L. and Slobin, D.I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58, 265–289.Google Scholar
  29. Chamberlin, T.C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148, 754–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, A. (1966). Errors of speech and their implication for understanding the strategy of language users. In: Fromkin, V.A. (Eds.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence (S. 88–92 ). Den Haag: Mouton (1973).Google Scholar
  31. Cole, R.A., Jakimik, J. and Cooper, W.E. (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cole, R.A. and Rudnicky, A.I. (1983). What’s new in speech perception? The research and ideas of William Chandler Bagley, 1874–1946. Psychological Review 90, 94–101.Google Scholar
  33. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. and Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 100, 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E. Jonasson, J.T. and Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In: Dornic, S. (Eds.), Attention and Performance,Vol. VI (S. 535–555). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Coltheart, M. and Funnel], E. (1987). Reading and writing: One lexicon or two? In: Allport, A., MacKay, D.G., Prinz, W. and Scheerer, E. (Eds.), Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing (S. 313–339 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Cutler, A. (1981). The reliability of speech error data. Linguistics 19, 561–582.Google Scholar
  37. De Bleser, R. (1987). From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4, 187–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dell, G.S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchical connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science 9, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93, 283–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dell, G.S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dell, G.S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitve Processes 5, 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dell, G.S., Burger, L.K. and Svec, W.R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104, 123–147.Google Scholar
  43. Dell, G.S. and Juliano, C. (1996). Computational models of phonological encoding. In: Dijkstra, T. and deSmedt, K. (Eds.), Computational Psycholinguistics (S. 328–359 ). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  44. Dell, G.S., Juliano, C. and Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production. Cognitive Science 17, 149–195.Google Scholar
  45. Dell, G.S. and O’Seaghdha, P.G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexica] priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review 98, 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dell, G.S. and O’Seaghdha, P.G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dell, G.S. and Reich, P.A. (1980). Toward a unified model of slips of the tongue. In: Fromkin, V.A. (Eds.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand (S. 273–286 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Dell, G.S. and Reich, P.A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dell, G.S., Schwartz, M.F., Martin, N., Saffran, E.M. and Gagnon, D.A. (1996). A connectionist model of naming errors in aphasia. In: Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Berndt, R.S. (Eds.), Neural Modeling of Brain and Cognitive Behavior (S. 135–156 ). Singapur: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  50. Dennett, D.C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  51. Deutsch, W. (1994). Mit dem Zeitgeist gegen den Zeitgeist: Die Anfänge des Forschungsprogramms „Objektbenennung“. In: Kornadt, H.-J., Grabowski, J. and Mangold-Allwinn, R. (Eds.), Sprache und Kognition (S. 15–35 ). Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  52. Eikmeyer, H.-J., Kindt, W., Laubenstein, U., Lisken, S., Rieser, H. and Schade, U. (1995). Coherence regained. In: Rickheit, G. and Habel, C. (Eds.), Focus and Coherence in Discourse Processing (S. 115–142 ). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  53. Eikmeyer, H.-J., Kupitz, M., Laubenstein, U. and Schade, U. (1995). Object specificati- ons: The order of adjectives. In: Dreschler-Fischer, L. and Pribbenow, S. (Eds.), KI-95 Activities: Workshops, Posters, Demos (S. 127–128 ). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.Google Scholar
  54. Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Schade, U. (1991). Sequentialization in connectionist language-production models. Cognitive Systems 3, 128–138.Google Scholar
  55. Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Schade, U. (1993). The role of computer simulation in neurolinguistics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 16, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Eikmeyer, H.-J., Schade, U. and Kupietz, M. (1995). Ein konnektionistisches Modell für die Produktion von Objektbenennungen. Kognitionswissenschaft 4, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Eling, P. (Eds.) (1994). Reader in the History of Aphasia (= Classics in Psycholinguistics, Vol. 4 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  58. Ellis, A.W., Miller, D. and Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke’s aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition 15, 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ellis, A.W. and Young, A.W. (1988). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  60. Elman, J.L. (1990): Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14, 213–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Estes, W.K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In: Melton, A.W. and Martin, E. (Eds.), Coding Processes in Human Memory (S. 161–190 ). Washington, DC: Winston.Google Scholar
  62. Feldman, J.A. and Ballard, D.H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science 6, 205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Forster, K.I. (1994). Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 1292–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Francis, W.N. and Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  65. Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gainotti, G. (1976). The relationship between semantic impairment in comprehension and naming in aphasic patients. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 11, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Gainotti, G., Miceli, G., Caltagirone, C., Silveri, M. and Masullo, C. (1981). Selective semantic-lexical impairment of language comprehension in right-brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 13, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Garnham, A., Shillock, R.C., Brown, G.D.A., Mill, A.I.D. and Cutler, A. (1981). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversations. In: Cutler, A. (Eds.), Slips of the Tongue and Language Production, special issue of Linguistics 19, 805–817.Google Scholar
  69. Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower, G. (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 9, 5. 133–177 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  70. Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In: Butterworth, B. (Eds.), Language Prroduction, Vol. 1 (S. 177–220 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Garrett, M.F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production: Applications to aphasic speech. In: Caplan, D., Lecours, A.R. and Smith, A. (Eds.), Biological Perspectives on Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Garrett, M.F. (1988). Processes in language production. In: Newmeyer, F.J. (Eds.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. III (S. 69–96 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Glaser, W.R. and Düngelhoff, F.J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 640–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 1158–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Haag, E., Huber, W., Hündgen, R., Stiller, U. and Willmes, K. (1985). Repetitives sprachliches Verhalten bei schwerer Aphasie. Der Nervenarzt 56, 543–552.Google Scholar
  76. Harley, T.A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitve Science 8, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Harley, T.A. (1990a). Paragrammatisms: Syntactic disturbance or failure of control? Cognition 34, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Harley, T.A. (1990b). Environmental contamination of normal speech. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Harley, T.A. (1993a). Connectionist approaches to language disorders. Aphasiology 7, 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Harley, T.A. (1993b). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Harley, T.A. and MacAndrew, S.B.G. (1992). Modelling paraphasia in normal and aphasic speech. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (S. 378–383 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  82. Hart, J., Berndt, R.S. and Caramazza, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature 316, 439–440.Google Scholar
  83. Heeschen, C. (1985). Agrammatism and Paragrammatism: A fictitious opposition. In: Kean, M.L. (Eds.), Agrammatism (S. 207–248 ). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  84. Herrmann, T. and Deutsch, W. (1976). Psychologie der Objektbenennung (= Studien zur Sprachpsychologie, Bd. 5). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  85. Herrmann, T. and Grabowski, J. (1994). Sprechen: Psychologie der Sprachproduktion. Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  86. Hinton, G.E. (1991). Mapping part-whole hierarchies into connectionist networks. In: Hinton, G.E. (Eds.), Connectionist Symbol Processing ( 5. 47–75 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  87. Hinton, G.E. and Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review 98, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Höhle, B. (1995). Aphasie und Sprachproduktion: Sprachstörungen bei Broca-und Wernicke-Aphasikern. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  89. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. and White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Hotopf, W.H.N. (1983). Lexical slips of the pen and tongue. In: Butterworth, B. (Eds.), Language Production, Vol. 2 (S. 147–199 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In: Dale, R., Mellish, C. and Zock, M. (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (S. 287–319 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  92. Howard, D. and Orchard-Lisle, V. (1984). On the origin of semantic errors in naming: Evidence from the case of a global aphasic. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1, 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D. and Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener Aphasie Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  94. Huber, W., Stachowiak, F.J., Poeck, K. and Kerschensteiner, M. (1975). Die Wernicke-Aphasie. Journal of Neurology 210, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Jacobs, A.M. and Grainger, G. (1992). Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 1174–1188.Google Scholar
  96. Jacobs, A.M. and Grainger, G. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 1311–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Jaeger, J. (1992). Not by the chair of my hinny hin hin’: Some general properties of slips of the tongue in young children. Journal of Child Language 19, 335–366.Google Scholar
  98. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  100. Jones, G.V. and Langford, S. (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition 26, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Jordan, M.I. (1986). Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science (S. 531–546 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  102. Kay, J. (1982). Psychological Mechanisms of Oral Reading of Single Words. Promotionsschrift. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  103. Kay, J. and Ellis, A.W. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case of anomia: Implications for psychological models of word retrieval. Brain 110, 613–629.Google Scholar
  104. Katz, J.J. and Fodor, J.A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39, 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kelter, S. (1990). Aphasien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  106. Kempen, G. and Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science 11, 201–258.Google Scholar
  107. Kinsbourne, M. and Warrington, E.K. (1963). Jargon aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kleist, K. (1914). Aphasie und Geisteskrankheit. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 61, 8–12.Google Scholar
  110. Kleist, K. (1916). Über Leitungsaphasie und grammatische Störungen. Monatsschrift für Psychatrie und Neurologie 16, 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Kleist, K. (1934). Kriegsverletzungen des Gehirns in ihrer Bedeutung für die Hirnlokalisation und Hirnpathologie. In: Bonhoeffer, K. (Eds.), Handbuch der ärztlichen Erfahrungen im Weltkriege 1914–1918 (Bd. 4 ). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  112. Kolk, H. and Heeschen, C. (1992). Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes 7, 89–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress, L.A. (Eds.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (S. 112–136 ). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  114. Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  116. Levelt, W.J.M. (1991). Die konnektionistische Mode. Sprache und Kognition 10, 61–72.Google Scholar
  117. Levelt, W.J.M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition 42, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Levelt, W.J.M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A.S., Pechmann, T. and Havinga, J. (1991a). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review 98, 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Levelt, W.J.M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A.S., Pechmann, T. and Havinga, J. (19916). Normal and deviant lexical processing: Reply to Dell and O’Seaghdha (1991). Psychological Review 98, 615–618.Google Scholar
  120. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choise Behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  121. Lupker, S.J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference. Memory and Cognition 7, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Lupker, S.J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 709–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. MacKay, D.G. (1971). Stress pre-entry in motor systems. American Journal of Psychology 84, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. MacKay, D.G. (1976). On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. MacKay, D.G. (1982). The problem of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behaviors. Psychological Review 89, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. MacKay, D.G. (1987). The Organization of Perception and Action: A Theory for Language and other Cognitive Skills. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. MacKay, D.G. (1988). Under what conditions can theoretical psychology survive and prosper? Integrating the rational and empirical epistemologies. Psychological Review 95, 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Mangold-Allwinn, R. (1993). Flexible Konzepte. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.Google Scholar
  129. Mangold-Allwinn, R. (1994). Das Forschungsprogramm „Objektbenennung“: Neuere Entwicklungen. In: Kornadt, H.-J., Grabowski, J. and Mangold-Allwinn, R. (Eds.), Sprache and Kognition (S. 209–232 ). Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  130. Mangold-Allwinn, R., von Stutterheim, C., Barattelli, S., Kohlmann, U. and Koelbing, H.G. (1992). Objektbenennung im Diskurs: Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung. Kognitionswissenschaft 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
  131. Martin, N., Dell, G.S., Saffran, E.M. and Schwartz, M.F. (1994). Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language 47, 609–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Martin, N., Gagnon, D.A., Schwartz, M.F., Dell, G.S. and Saffran, E.M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Martin, N. and Saffran, E. (1992). A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language 43, 240–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Massaro, D.W. (1988). Some criticisms of connectionist models of human performance. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Massaro, D.W. and Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind. Annual Review of Psychology 44, 383–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. McClelland, J.L. (1988). Conectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. McClelland, J.L. and Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18, 1–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Menn, L. and Obler (Eds.) (1990). Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook, 3 Bände. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  140. Meringer, R. (1908). Aus dem Leben der Sprache: Versprechen, Kindersprache, Nachahmungstrieb. Berlin: Behrs.Google Scholar
  141. Meringer, R. and Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen and Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschen.Google Scholar
  142. Meyer, A.S. (1991): The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Meyer, A.S. and Bock, J.K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition 20, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Meyer, A.S. and Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological falcilitation in picture-word interfe- rence experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17, 1146–1160.Google Scholar
  145. Miceli, G. and Mazzucchi, A. (1990). Agrammatism in Italian: Two case studies. In: Menn, L. and Obler, L.K. (Eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook (S. 717–816 ). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  146. Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L. and Goodglass, H. (1983). Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language 19, 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Mitroff, I.I. (1974). The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  148. Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In: Allport, A., MacKay, D.G., Prinz, W. and Scheerer, E. (Eds.), Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing (S. 273–311 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  149. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Motley, M.T. and Baars, B.J. (1975). Encoding sensitivities to phonological markedness and transition probability: Evidence from spoonerisms. Human Communication Research 2, 351–361.Google Scholar
  151. Nooteboom, S.G. (1969). The tongue slips into pattern. In: Fromkin, V.A. (Eds.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence (S. 144–156 ). Den Haag: Mouton (1973).Google Scholar
  152. Olson, D.R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review 77, 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Patterson, K.E., Plant, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M., Behrmann, M. and Hodges, J.R. (1996). Connections and disconnections: A connectionist account of surface dyslexia. In: Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Berndt, R.S. (Eds.), Neural Modeling of Brain and Cognitive Behavior (S. 177–199 ). Singapur: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Patterson, K.E., Seidenberg, M.S. and McClelland, J.L. (1989). Connections and disorders: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. In: Morris, R.G.M. (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology (S. 131–181 ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  155. Pechmann, T. (1994). Sprachproduktion: Zur Generierung komplexer Nominalphrasen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  156. Pick, A. (1913). Die agrammatischen Sprachstörungen. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Pick, A. and Thiele, R. (1931). Aphasie. In: Bethe, A. and Bergmann, G. (Eds.), Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie, Bd. XV (S. 1416–1524 ). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  158. Platt, J.R. (1964). Strong inference. Science 146, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Plant, D.C. (1996). Connectionist modeling of the breakdown and recovery of reading via meaning. In: Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Berndt, R.S. (Eds.), Neural Modeling of Brain and Cognitive Behavior (S. 157–176 ). Singapur: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Plant, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. and Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103, 56–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Plant, D.C. and Shallice, T. (1991). Effects of word abstractness in a connectionist model of deep dyslexia. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (S. 73–78 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  162. Popper, K.C. (1956). Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, 4. Auflage 1972.Google Scholar
  163. Popper, K.C. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York, NY: Basic Books. Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Berndt, R.S. (Eds.) (1996). Neural Modeling of Brain and Cognitive Behavior. Singapur: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  164. Rickheit, G. and Strohner, H. (1993). Grundlagen der kognitiven Sprachverarbeitung. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
  165. Ritter, H. and Kohonen, T. (1989). Self-organizing semantic maps. Biological Cybernetics 61, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Ritter, H., Martinetz, T. and Schulten, K. (1991). Neuronale Netze: Eine Einführung in die Neuroinformatik selbstorganisierender Netzwerke. Bonn: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  167. Roelofs, A. (1992a). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 42, 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Roelofs, A. (1992b). Lemma Retrieval in Speaking: A Theory, Computer Simulations, and Empirical Data. Dissertationsschrift: Universität Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  169. Roelofs, A. (1993). Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition 47, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Rosinski, R.R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development 48, 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations (S. 318–362 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  172. Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 2: The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 89, 60–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  174. Rumelhart, D.E. and Norman, D.A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitve motor performance. Cognitive Science 6, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Schade, U. (1990). Kohärenz und Monitor in konnektionistischen Sprachproduktionsmodellen. In: Dorffner, G. (Eds.), Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung (= 6. Österreichische Artificial-Intelligence-Tagung (KONNAI), Proceedings) (S. 18–27 ). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  176. Schade, U. (1992). Konnektionismus: Zur Modellierung der Sprachproduktion. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Schade, U. and Berg, T. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production. Part 2: The simulational perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 21, 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Schade, U. and Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1990). Modelling attention in a connectionist speech production model. In: Eckmiller, R., Hartmann, G. and Hauske, G. (Eds.), Parallel Processing in Neural Systems and Computers (S. 495–498 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  179. Schade, U. and Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1991). „wahrscheinlich sind meine Beispiele soo sprunghaft und und und eh ehm zu zu telegraph“-Konnektionistische Modellierung von „covert repairs”. In: Christaller, T. (Eds.), GWAI-91: 15. Fachtagung für Künstliche Intelligenz, Proceedings (S. 264–273 ). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  180. Schade, U. and Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1997). Modeling the production of object specifications. In: Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. (Eds.), Symbolic Connectionist Approaches to human Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  181. Schade, U. and Laubenstein, U. (1993). Repairs in a connectionist language-production model. In: Köhler, R. and Rieger, B. (Eds.), Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics ( 5. 79–90 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Schlenck, K.-J. (1991). Paragrammatismus. In: Blanken, G. (Eds.), Einführung in die linguistische Aphasiologie: Theorie und Praxis (S. 199–229 ). Freiburg: Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
  183. Schlenck, C., Schlenck, K.-J. and Springer, L. (1995). Die Behandlung des schweren Agrammatismus: Reduzierte-Syntax-Therorie (REST) (= Reihe Forum Logopädie). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.Google Scholar
  184. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19, 841–850.Google Scholar
  185. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S. and Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 29, 86–102.Google Scholar
  186. Schwartz, M.F., Saffran, E.M., Bloch, D.E. and Dell, G.S. (1994). Disordered speech production in aphasic and normal speakers. Brain an Language 47, 52–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Seidenberg, M.S. (1993). Connectionist models and cognitive theory. Psychological Science 4, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Seidenberg, M.S. and McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96, 523–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Seidenberg, M.S. and McClelland, J.L. (1990). More words but still no lexicon. Reply to Besener et al. (1990). Psychological Review 97, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Shallice, T. (1987). Impairments of semantic processing: Multiple dissociations. In: Job, R., Sartori, G. and Coltheart, M. (Eds.), The Cognitve Neuropsychology of Language (S. 111–127 ). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  191. Shallice, T. and Saffran, E.M. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology 3, 429–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1982). Three kinds of speech error evidence for the role of grammatical elements in processing. In: Obier, L.K. and Menn, L. (Eds.), Exceptional Language and Linguistics (S. 133–142 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  193. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word-onset consonants in speech planing: New evidence from speech error patterns. In: Keller, E. and Gopnik, M. (Eds.), Motor and Sensory Processes of Language (S. 17–51 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  194. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. and Klatt, D.H. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 41–55.Google Scholar
  195. Söderpalm, E. (1979). Speech Errors in Normal and Pathological Speech. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
  196. St. John, M.F. and McClelland, J.L. (1991). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. In: Hinton, G.E. (Eds.), Connectionist Symbol Processing (S. 217–257 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  197. Stemberger, J.P. (1984). Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1, 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Stemberger, J.P. (1985a). An interactive activation model of language production. In: Ellis, A.W. (Eds.), Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 1, S. 143–186 ). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  199. Stemberger, J.P. (1985b). The Lexicon in a Model of Language Production. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
  200. Stemberger, J.P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 164–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Stemberger,J.P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition 35, 123157.Google Scholar
  202. Stemberger, J.P. (1992a). A connectionist view of child phonology. In: Ferguson, C.A., Menn, L. and Stoel-Gammon, C. (Eds.), Phonological Development (S. 165–189 ). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  203. Stemberger, J.P. (1992b). The reliability and replicability of naturalistic speech error data: A comparison with experimentally induced errors. In: Baars, B.J. (Eds.), Experimental Slips and Human Error: Exploring the Architecture of Volition (S. 195–215 ). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Stemberger, J.P. and MacWhinney, B. (1986). Form-oriented errors in inflectional processing. Cognitive Psychology 18, 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Strube, G., Hemforth, B. and Wrobel, H. (1990). Auf dem Weg zu psychologisch fun- dierten Modellen menschlicher Sprachverarbeitung. In: Felix, S.W., Kanngießer, S. and Rickheit, G. (Eds.), Sprache und Wissen (S. 115–133 ). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Thagard, P. (1988). Computational Philososphy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  207. Broecke, M.P.R. and Goldstein, L. (1980). Consonant features in speech errors. In: Fromkin, V.A. (Eds.), Errors in Linguistic Performance (S. 47–65 ). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  208. Wallesch, C.-W. and Kertesz, A. (1993). Clinical symptoms and syndroms of aphasia. In: Blanken, G. et al. (Eds.), Linguisitc Disorders and Pathologies (S. 98–119). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  209. Waltz, D.L. and Pollack, J. (1985). Massively parallel parsing: A strongly interactive model of natural language interpretation. Cognitive Science 9, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Warrington, E.K. and Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain 107, 829–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Wenner, A.M. and Wells, P.H. (1990). Anatomy of a Controversy: The Question of a “Language” among Bees. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  212. Wickelgren, W.A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of se- mantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system. Psychological Review 86, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Wijnen, F. (1992). Incidental word and sound errors in young speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 734–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32, 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1999

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations