Skip to main content

Efficiency and Productivity of Norwegian Colleges

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Harzer wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Schriften ((HWS))

Abstract

Regional colleges in Norway were reorganised in 1994 with the purpose of promoting efficiency and productivity. This is the first effort of checking what actually has happened afterwards with efficiency and productivity. DEA and Malmquist index approaches are used. Data for three years, 1994, 1995 and 1996 at a department level for about 100 units where collected by questionnaire and direct contacts. The three outputs where final exams distributed on two types; short- and long studies, and research publications. Inputs where number of academic and non-academic staff in full time equivalents, current expenses other than salaries, and building size in square metres. Typical cross section efficiency results show a large share of efficient departments, with a disproportionate number of efficient departments giving theoretical general education, and a large variation within the group of inefficient units. The difference between professional and arts and science departments may be explained by the nature of the teaching production function, but calculations for a sub-sample of professional departments (e. g. nurses, engineers, teachers) show almost the same variation within this group. The productivity change each year was mainly positive, with most departments experiencing a positive productivity effect from frontier shift, but a greater variation from positive to negative as regards the contribution from catching up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Afriat, S. (1972): Efficiency estimation of production functions, International Economic Review 13(3), 568–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, T., V. Arnold, A. Chames and W. W. Cooper (1989): DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. and N. Petersen (1993): A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper (1984): Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies, Management Science 39, 1261–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, J. E. (1990): Comparing university departments, OMEGA Int. Journal of Management Sci. 18(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg S. A., F. R. Forsund and E. Jansen (1992): Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–1989, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., L. Fallan and A. Pettersen (1997): Diciplinary differences in job satisfaction, self-efficacy, goal commitment, and organizational commitment among faculty employees in Norwegian colleges: an empirical assessment of indicators of performance, Rapport i TØH-serien 1997:2, Avdeling for Økonomisk-Administrativ utdanning, Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert (1982): The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity, Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978): Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. R. and A. J. Arthurs (1995): Judging the quality of research in business schools: the UK case study, Omega 23,257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsen, E., F. R. Førsund og K. O. Kalhagen (1998): Effektivitet og produktivitet i de statlige høyskoler [Efficiency and productivity in the public colleges], SNF — rapport 14/98, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120 (III), 253–281 (290)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, J. (1991): The use of assessments of British university teaching, and especially research, for the allocation of resources — A personal view, European Economic Review 35, 612–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1965): Theory of production, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and C. A. K. Lovell (1978): Measuring the technial efficiency of production, Journal of Economic Theory 19, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell (1985): The measurement of efficiency of production, Boston: Kluwer — Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fôre, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell (1994a): Production frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, D. Lindgren and P. Roos (1994b): Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach, in Chames, A., W. W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L. M. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: theory, methodology, and applications, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 253–272.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. (1996a): On the calculation of the scale elasticity in DEA models, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2/3), 283–302, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. (1996b): Productivity of Norwegian establishments: a Malmquist index approach, in D. G. Mayes (ed.): Sources of productivity growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. (1997): The Malmquist productivity index, TFP and scale, Memorandum no. 233, Dept. of Economics, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. and L. Hjalmarsson (1974): On the measurement of productive efficiency, Swedish Journal of Economics 76(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. and L. Hjalmarsson (1979): Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: an application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants, Economic Journal 89, 294–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. C. (1989): Performance measurement in universities, European Journal of Operational Research 38, 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G. (1990): Measures of research output: university departments of economics in the UK, 1983–88, The Economic Journal, 100, 556–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G. (1997): Costs and industrial structure in contemporary British higher education, The Economic Journal, 107, 727–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. and G. Johnes (1993): Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers, 45, 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. and G. Johnes (1995): Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: a frontier analysis, Economics of Education Review, 14, 3, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., J. Taylor and G. Ferguson (1993): The employability of new graduates: a study of differences between UK universities, Applied Economics 19, 695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., J. Taylor and B. Francis (1993): The research performance of UK universities: a statistical Aanalysis of the results of the 1989 Research Selectivity Exercise, J.R. Statistical Society, 156, part 2, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalhagen, K. O. (1998): En analyse av teknisk effektivitet og produktivitet i høgskolesektoren basert på Data Envelopment Analysis [An analysis of technical efficiency and productivity based on Data Envelopment Analysis], SNF-arbeidnotat nr. 38/98, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953): Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M. and J. M. Page (1982): Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia 1965–78, Economic Journal 92, 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsk Samfunnsvitenskaplige Datatjeneste (1997): Statistikk om høgre utdanning 1997. Økonomi, Studenter, Ansatte. NSD-publikasjon av desember 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, E. L. and L. Southwick (1993): Variations in public and private university efficiency, Applications of Management Science, Public Policy Applications of Management Science 7, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarafoglou, N and Haynes, K. E. (1996): University production in Sweden: a demonstration and explanatory analysis for economics and business programs, The Annals of Regional Science, 30, 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1953): Cost and production functions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinuany-Stern, Z., A. Mehrez and A. Barboy (1994): Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers Ops Res. 21, 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S and Green, R. (1988): An experiment in the use of Data Envelopement Analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting, Financial Accountability & Management 4, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen, A. M., F. R. Førsund and S. A. C. Kittelsen (1996): Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Georg Westermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Førsund, F.R., Ove Kalhagen, K. (1999). Efficiency and Productivity of Norwegian Colleges. In: Westermann, G. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Harzer wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Schriften. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-7012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-08343-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics