Abstract
Regional colleges in Norway were reorganised in 1994 with the purpose of promoting efficiency and productivity. This is the first effort of checking what actually has happened afterwards with efficiency and productivity. DEA and Malmquist index approaches are used. Data for three years, 1994, 1995 and 1996 at a department level for about 100 units where collected by questionnaire and direct contacts. The three outputs where final exams distributed on two types; short- and long studies, and research publications. Inputs where number of academic and non-academic staff in full time equivalents, current expenses other than salaries, and building size in square metres. Typical cross section efficiency results show a large share of efficient departments, with a disproportionate number of efficient departments giving theoretical general education, and a large variation within the group of inefficient units. The difference between professional and arts and science departments may be explained by the nature of the teaching production function, but calculations for a sub-sample of professional departments (e. g. nurses, engineers, teachers) show almost the same variation within this group. The productivity change each year was mainly positive, with most departments experiencing a positive productivity effect from frontier shift, but a greater variation from positive to negative as regards the contribution from catching up.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afriat, S. (1972): Efficiency estimation of production functions, International Economic Review 13(3), 568–598.
Ahn, T., V. Arnold, A. Chames and W. W. Cooper (1989): DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5, 165–185.
Andersen, P. and N. Petersen (1993): A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper (1984): Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies, Management Science 39, 1261–1264.
Beasley, J. E. (1990): Comparing university departments, OMEGA Int. Journal of Management Sci. 18(2), 171–183.
Berg S. A., F. R. Forsund and E. Jansen (1992): Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–1989, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 211–228.
Busch, T., L. Fallan and A. Pettersen (1997): Diciplinary differences in job satisfaction, self-efficacy, goal commitment, and organizational commitment among faculty employees in Norwegian colleges: an empirical assessment of indicators of performance, Rapport i TØH-serien 1997:2, Avdeling for Økonomisk-Administrativ utdanning, Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert (1982): The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity, Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978): Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.
Doyle, J. R. and A. J. Arthurs (1995): Judging the quality of research in business schools: the UK case study, Omega 23,257–270.
Erlandsen, E., F. R. Førsund og K. O. Kalhagen (1998): Effektivitet og produktivitet i de statlige høyskoler [Efficiency and productivity in the public colleges], SNF — rapport 14/98, Oslo.
Farrell, M. (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120 (III), 253–281 (290)
Flemming, J. (1991): The use of assessments of British university teaching, and especially research, for the allocation of resources — A personal view, European Economic Review 35, 612–618.
Frisch, R. (1965): Theory of production, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Färe, R. and C. A. K. Lovell (1978): Measuring the technial efficiency of production, Journal of Economic Theory 19, 150–162.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell (1985): The measurement of efficiency of production, Boston: Kluwer — Nijhoff.
Fôre, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell (1994a): Production frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, D. Lindgren and P. Roos (1994b): Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach, in Chames, A., W. W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L. M. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: theory, methodology, and applications, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 253–272.
Førsund, F. R. (1996a): On the calculation of the scale elasticity in DEA models, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2/3), 283–302, 1996.
Førsund, F. R. (1996b): Productivity of Norwegian establishments: a Malmquist index approach, in D. G. Mayes (ed.): Sources of productivity growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–330.
Førsund, F. R. (1997): The Malmquist productivity index, TFP and scale, Memorandum no. 233, Dept. of Economics, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University.
Førsund, F. R. and L. Hjalmarsson (1974): On the measurement of productive efficiency, Swedish Journal of Economics 76(2), 141–154.
Førsund, F. R. and L. Hjalmarsson (1979): Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: an application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants, Economic Journal 89, 294–315.
Higgins, J. C. (1989): Performance measurement in universities, European Journal of Operational Research 38, 358–368.
Johnes, G. (1990): Measures of research output: university departments of economics in the UK, 1983–88, The Economic Journal, 100, 556–560.
Johnes, G. (1997): Costs and industrial structure in contemporary British higher education, The Economic Journal, 107, 727–737.
Johnes, J. and G. Johnes (1993): Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers, 45, 332–347.
Johnes, J. and G. Johnes (1995): Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: a frontier analysis, Economics of Education Review, 14, 3, 301–314.
Johnes, J., J. Taylor and G. Ferguson (1993): The employability of new graduates: a study of differences between UK universities, Applied Economics 19, 695–710.
Johnes, J., J. Taylor and B. Francis (1993): The research performance of UK universities: a statistical Aanalysis of the results of the 1989 Research Selectivity Exercise, J.R. Statistical Society, 156, part 2, 271–286.
Kalhagen, K. O. (1998): En analyse av teknisk effektivitet og produktivitet i høgskolesektoren basert på Data Envelopment Analysis [An analysis of technical efficiency and productivity based on Data Envelopment Analysis], SNF-arbeidnotat nr. 38/98, Oslo.
Malmquist, S. (1953): Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.
Nishimizu, M. and J. M. Page (1982): Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia 1965–78, Economic Journal 92, 920–936.
Norsk Samfunnsvitenskaplige Datatjeneste (1997): Statistikk om høgre utdanning 1997. Økonomi, Studenter, Ansatte. NSD-publikasjon av desember 1997.
Rhodes, E. L. and L. Southwick (1993): Variations in public and private university efficiency, Applications of Management Science, Public Policy Applications of Management Science 7, 145–170.
Sarafoglou, N and Haynes, K. E. (1996): University production in Sweden: a demonstration and explanatory analysis for economics and business programs, The Annals of Regional Science, 30, 285–304.
Shephard, R. W. (1953): Cost and production functions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sinuany-Stern, Z., A. Mehrez and A. Barboy (1994): Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers Ops Res. 21, 543–556.
Tomkins, S and Green, R. (1988): An experiment in the use of Data Envelopement Analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting, Financial Accountability & Management 4, 147–164.
Torgersen, A. M., F. R. Førsund and S. A. C. Kittelsen (1996): Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 379–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Førsund, F.R., Ove Kalhagen, K. (1999). Efficiency and Productivity of Norwegian Colleges. In: Westermann, G. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Harzer wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Schriften. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_13
Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-7012-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-08343-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive