Media Coverage of Environmental Issues

  • Michael E. Nitz


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ader, C. (1995): A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2. S. 300 – 311.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, J. (1992): Little green lies: The environmental miseducation of America’s children. In: Policy Review. 56. S. 18 – 27.Google Scholar
  3. Alger, D. (1996): The media and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, C. (1998). Public policy and the geography of U.S. environmentalism. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 55 – 73.Google Scholar
  5. Ansolabehere, S./Behr, R./Iyengar, S. (1993): The media game: American politics in the television age. New York.Google Scholar
  6. Atwater, T./Salwen, M./Anderson, R. (1985): Media agenda setting with environmental issues. In: Journalism Quarterly. 62. S. 393 – 397.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, C. (1996): Needed: A recommitment. In: Nieman Reports. 40. S. 5 – 8.Google Scholar
  8. Boyle, R. (1993): All the news that’s fit to twist: Misleading news on the environment. In: The Amicus Journal. 15. S. 9.Google Scholar
  9. Brosius, H./Kepplinger, H. (1990): The agenda-setting function of television news. In: Communication Research. 17. S. 183 – 211.Google Scholar
  10. Cantril, J. (1993): Communication and our environment: Categorizing research in environmental advocacy. In: Journal of Applied Communication Research. 21. S. 36 – 66.Google Scholar
  11. Cantrill, J./Oravec, C. (1996) (Eds.): The symbolic earth: Discourse and our creation of the environment. Lexington.Google Scholar
  12. Carmen, C. (1998): Dimensions of Environmental Policy Support in the U.S. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 717 – 733.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, R./Tuggle, V. (1997): The world outside: Local TV news’ treatment of imported news. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 74. S. 123 – 133.Google Scholar
  14. Chepesiuk, R. (1993): Covering the environmental beat. In: Editor and Publisher. 126. S. 18 – 21.Google Scholar
  15. Cracknell, J. (1993): Issue arenas, pressure groups, and environmental agendas. In: Hansen ( 1993 ): 3 – 21.Google Scholar
  16. Crigler, A./Just, M./Neuman, W. (1994): Interpreting visual versus audio messages in television news. In: Journal of Communication. 44. S. 132 – 152.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, J. (1995): The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 72. S. 285 – 299.Google Scholar
  18. Dunwoody, S./Neuwirth, K. (1991): Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgements. In: Wilkinson/Patterson ( 1991 ): 1 – 30.Google Scholar
  19. Eilders, C. (1997): Editorials and public opinion. Paper presented at the annual International Conference on Media and Politics. Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Entman, R. (1993): Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. In: Journal of Communication. 43. S. 51 – 58.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, S. (1991): Two decades of the environmental beat. In LeMay/Dennis (1991): o. S. Graber, D. ( 1989 ): Mass media and American politics. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg, M./Sandman, P./Sachsman, D./Salomone, K. (1989): Network television news coverage of environmental risks. In: Environment. 31. S. 16–20 and 40–43.Google Scholar
  23. Greider, W. (1992): Who will tell the people? The betrayal of American democracy. New York.Google Scholar
  24. Griffin, R./Dunwoody, S. (1995): Impacts of information subsidies and community structure on local press coverage of environmental contamination. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 72. S. 271 – 284.Google Scholar
  25. Hansen, A. (1993) (Ed.): The mass media and environmental issues. New York.Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, A. (1991): The media and the social construction of the environment. In: Media, Culture, and Society. 13. S. 443 – 458.Google Scholar
  27. Hendry, J. (1994): The three voices of the media: A case study of the television media’s coverage of the controversy surrounding a toxic waste incinerator. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  28. Iyengar, S. (1991): Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Iyengar, S./Kinder, D. (1987): News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Jaehne, D. (1990): From polluted environment to endangered planet: Ideology and environment in Time, 1969 – 1989. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  31. Jamieson, K./Campbell, K. (1992): The interplay of influence: News, advertising, politics, and the mass media ( 3rd ed. ). Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  32. Jarvis, S./Nitz, M. (1997, Nov.): Mediated meteorologists: Scientists as sources in televised news stories about global warming. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  33. King, E./Schudson, M. (1995): The press and the illusion of public opinion: The strange case of Ronald Reagan’s popularity. In: Salmon/Glasser ( 1995 ): 132 – 155.Google Scholar
  34. Kleinsteuber, H./Thomaß, B. (1998, April): TV in Deutschland. In: Deutschland: Magazine on Politics, Culture, Business and Science. 2. S. 24 – 30.Google Scholar
  35. Klineberg, S./McKeever, M./Rothenbach, B. (1998): Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it is measured. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 734 – 753.Google Scholar
  36. Lacey, C., & Longman, D. (1993). The press and public access to the environment and development debate. In: The Sociological Review. 41. S. 207–244.Google Scholar
  37. LeMay, C./Dennis, E. (1991) ( Eds. ): Media and the environment. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Mazur, A./Lee, J. (1993): Sounding the global alarm: Environmental issues in the U.S. national news. In. Social Studies of Science. 23. S. 681 – 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McClellan, S. (1992): Gearing up for green coverage: Media coverage of the earth summit in Rio de Janeiro. In: Broadcasting. 122. S. 14 – 17.Google Scholar
  40. McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999): Impact of narratives. In: Communication Research. 26. S. 30–57. Messaris, P. ( 1994 ): Visual literacy: Image, mind, and reality. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  41. Moore, D. (1995): Public sense of urgency about environmental issues wanes. In: The Gallup Poll Monthly. 3. S. 17 – 20.Google Scholar
  42. Morgan, M./Leggett, S. (1996) (Eds.): Mainstream(s) and margins: Cultural politics in the 90s. Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  43. Nitz, M./Jarvis, S. (1998, Sep.): Science in the News: The potential impact of scientists as sources in televised news stories about global warming. Paper presented at the 5th Annual International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology. Berlin.Google Scholar
  44. Nitz, M./Jarvis, S./Kenski, H. (1996): Television news coverage of global warming. In: World Resource Review. 8. S. 158 – 173.Google Scholar
  45. Paystrup, P. (1994, Nov.): There’s more to it than crying wolf: Uncovering deeper concerns behind an endangered species recovery plan’s “Not-in-my-backyard” protest. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  46. Pope, C. (1992): Alive and kicking: Mythical backlash against environmentalism. In: Sierra. 77. S. 16.Google Scholar
  47. Popkin, S. (1991): The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in Presidential campaigns. Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Ropeik, D. (1996): The challenges to TV. In: Nieman Reports. 40. S. 21 – 23.Google Scholar
  49. Ruben, B. (1994): Backtalk: Environmental problems are being misrepresented in the media. In: Environmental Action Magazine. 25. S. 11 – 17.Google Scholar
  50. Rubinstein, S. (1995): Surveying public opinion. Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Sachsman, D. (1991, May): Environmental risk communication the mass media. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  52. Salmon, C./Glasser, T. (1995) (Eds.): Public opinion and the communication of consent. New York.Google Scholar
  53. Schoenbach, K., & Becker, L. (1995). Origins and consequences of mediated public opinion. In Salmon/Glasser (1995): 323 – 347.Google Scholar
  54. Scheufele, D. (1999): Framing as a theory of media effects. In: Journal of Communication. S. 103 – 122.Google Scholar
  55. Shanahan, J. (1996): Green but unseen: Marginalizing the environment on television. In: Morgan/Leggett(1996): 176–193.Google Scholar
  56. Shanahan, J./McComas, K. (1997). Television’s portrayal of the environment: 1991–1995. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 74. S. 147 – 159.Google Scholar
  57. Singer, E./Endreny, P. (1993): Reporting on risk. New York.Google Scholar
  58. Stallings, R. (1990): Media discourse and the social construction of risk. In: Social Problems. 37. S. 80 – 95.Google Scholar
  59. Stavins, R. (1995): Environmental policy: Better media coverage of risks urged. In: Nieman Reports. 49. S. 12.Google Scholar
  60. Trumbo, C. (1996): Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in U.S. news coverage of an environmental issue. In: Public Understanding of Science. 5. S. 269 – 283.Google Scholar
  61. Ungar, S. (1992): The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. In: The Sociological Quarterly. 33. S. 483 – 501.Google Scholar
  62. Ungar, S. (1995): Social scares and global warming: Beyond the Rio convention. In: Society and Natural Resources. 8. S. 443 – 456.Google Scholar
  63. Weber, G. (1996): Global warming: The rest of the story. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  64. Wilkins, L. (1993): Between facts and values: Print media coverage of the greenhouse effect. 1987–1990. In: Public Understanding of Science. 2. S. 71 – 84.Google Scholar
  65. Wilkins, L./Patterson, P. (1991): Science as symbol: The media chills the greenhouse effect. In: Wilkins/Patterson ( 1991 ): 159 – 176.Google Scholar
  66. Wilkins, L./Patterson, P. (1991) (Eds.): Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Nitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations