Abstract
There is a perplexingly wide range of involvement, interest, and identification with environmental issues. Citizens seem able to display a wide variety of concern for environmental issues depending on the specific issue, demographical factors, and even geographical location (Andrews 1998; Carmen 1998; Klineberg/McKeever /Rothenbach 1998). Environmental concern is associated with many different tradeoffs that stimulate inconsistent responses (Klineberg et al. 1998: 752). Some scholars assert that citizens are expressing increased concern over the number and variety of environmental problems (McClellan 1992; Pope 1992). Neuzil and Kovarik (1996) note that newspaper readers have identified environmental news as the fastest growing topic of news interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ader, C. (1995): A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2. S. 300 – 311.
Adler, J. (1992): Little green lies: The environmental miseducation of America’s children. In: Policy Review. 56. S. 18 – 27.
Alger, D. (1996): The media and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Andrews, C. (1998). Public policy and the geography of U.S. environmentalism. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 55 – 73.
Ansolabehere, S./Behr, R./Iyengar, S. (1993): The media game: American politics in the television age. New York.
Atwater, T./Salwen, M./Anderson, R. (1985): Media agenda setting with environmental issues. In: Journalism Quarterly. 62. S. 393 – 397.
Bowman, C. (1996): Needed: A recommitment. In: Nieman Reports. 40. S. 5 – 8.
Boyle, R. (1993): All the news that’s fit to twist: Misleading news on the environment. In: The Amicus Journal. 15. S. 9.
Brosius, H./Kepplinger, H. (1990): The agenda-setting function of television news. In: Communication Research. 17. S. 183 – 211.
Cantril, J. (1993): Communication and our environment: Categorizing research in environmental advocacy. In: Journal of Applied Communication Research. 21. S. 36 – 66.
Cantrill, J./Oravec, C. (1996) (Eds.): The symbolic earth: Discourse and our creation of the environment. Lexington.
Carmen, C. (1998): Dimensions of Environmental Policy Support in the U.S. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 717 – 733.
Carroll, R./Tuggle, V. (1997): The world outside: Local TV news’ treatment of imported news. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 74. S. 123 – 133.
Chepesiuk, R. (1993): Covering the environmental beat. In: Editor and Publisher. 126. S. 18 – 21.
Cracknell, J. (1993): Issue arenas, pressure groups, and environmental agendas. In: Hansen ( 1993 ): 3 – 21.
Crigler, A./Just, M./Neuman, W. (1994): Interpreting visual versus audio messages in television news. In: Journal of Communication. 44. S. 132 – 152.
Davis, J. (1995): The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 72. S. 285 – 299.
Dunwoody, S./Neuwirth, K. (1991): Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgements. In: Wilkinson/Patterson ( 1991 ): 1 – 30.
Eilders, C. (1997): Editorials and public opinion. Paper presented at the annual International Conference on Media and Politics. Brussels.
Entman, R. (1993): Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. In: Journal of Communication. 43. S. 51 – 58.
Friedman, S. (1991): Two decades of the environmental beat. In LeMay/Dennis (1991): o. S. Graber, D. ( 1989 ): Mass media and American politics. Washington, D.C.
Greenberg, M./Sandman, P./Sachsman, D./Salomone, K. (1989): Network television news coverage of environmental risks. In: Environment. 31. S. 16–20 and 40–43.
Greider, W. (1992): Who will tell the people? The betrayal of American democracy. New York.
Griffin, R./Dunwoody, S. (1995): Impacts of information subsidies and community structure on local press coverage of environmental contamination. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 72. S. 271 – 284.
Hansen, A. (1993) (Ed.): The mass media and environmental issues. New York.
Hansen, A. (1991): The media and the social construction of the environment. In: Media, Culture, and Society. 13. S. 443 – 458.
Hendry, J. (1994): The three voices of the media: A case study of the television media’s coverage of the controversy surrounding a toxic waste incinerator. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
Iyengar, S. (1991): Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago.
Iyengar, S./Kinder, D. (1987): News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago.
Jaehne, D. (1990): From polluted environment to endangered planet: Ideology and environment in Time, 1969 – 1989. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Chicago, IL.
Jamieson, K./Campbell, K. (1992): The interplay of influence: News, advertising, politics, and the mass media ( 3rd ed. ). Belmont, CA.
Jarvis, S./Nitz, M. (1997, Nov.): Mediated meteorologists: Scientists as sources in televised news stories about global warming. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago, IL.
King, E./Schudson, M. (1995): The press and the illusion of public opinion: The strange case of Ronald Reagan’s popularity. In: Salmon/Glasser ( 1995 ): 132 – 155.
Kleinsteuber, H./Thomaß, B. (1998, April): TV in Deutschland. In: Deutschland: Magazine on Politics, Culture, Business and Science. 2. S. 24 – 30.
Klineberg, S./McKeever, M./Rothenbach, B. (1998): Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it is measured. In: Social Science Quarterly. 79. S. 734 – 753.
Lacey, C., & Longman, D. (1993). The press and public access to the environment and development debate. In: The Sociological Review. 41. S. 207–244.
LeMay, C./Dennis, E. (1991) ( Eds. ): Media and the environment. Washington, DC.
Mazur, A./Lee, J. (1993): Sounding the global alarm: Environmental issues in the U.S. national news. In. Social Studies of Science. 23. S. 681 – 720.
McClellan, S. (1992): Gearing up for green coverage: Media coverage of the earth summit in Rio de Janeiro. In: Broadcasting. 122. S. 14 – 17.
McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999): Impact of narratives. In: Communication Research. 26. S. 30–57. Messaris, P. ( 1994 ): Visual literacy: Image, mind, and reality. Boulder, CO.
Moore, D. (1995): Public sense of urgency about environmental issues wanes. In: The Gallup Poll Monthly. 3. S. 17 – 20.
Morgan, M./Leggett, S. (1996) (Eds.): Mainstream(s) and margins: Cultural politics in the 90s. Westport, CT.
Nitz, M./Jarvis, S. (1998, Sep.): Science in the News: The potential impact of scientists as sources in televised news stories about global warming. Paper presented at the 5th Annual International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology. Berlin.
Nitz, M./Jarvis, S./Kenski, H. (1996): Television news coverage of global warming. In: World Resource Review. 8. S. 158 – 173.
Paystrup, P. (1994, Nov.): There’s more to it than crying wolf: Uncovering deeper concerns behind an endangered species recovery plan’s “Not-in-my-backyard” protest. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
Pope, C. (1992): Alive and kicking: Mythical backlash against environmentalism. In: Sierra. 77. S. 16.
Popkin, S. (1991): The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in Presidential campaigns. Chicago.
Ropeik, D. (1996): The challenges to TV. In: Nieman Reports. 40. S. 21 – 23.
Ruben, B. (1994): Backtalk: Environmental problems are being misrepresented in the media. In: Environmental Action Magazine. 25. S. 11 – 17.
Rubinstein, S. (1995): Surveying public opinion. Belmont, CA.
Sachsman, D. (1991, May): Environmental risk communication the mass media. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
Salmon, C./Glasser, T. (1995) (Eds.): Public opinion and the communication of consent. New York.
Schoenbach, K., & Becker, L. (1995). Origins and consequences of mediated public opinion. In Salmon/Glasser (1995): 323 – 347.
Scheufele, D. (1999): Framing as a theory of media effects. In: Journal of Communication. S. 103 – 122.
Shanahan, J. (1996): Green but unseen: Marginalizing the environment on television. In: Morgan/Leggett(1996): 176–193.
Shanahan, J./McComas, K. (1997). Television’s portrayal of the environment: 1991–1995. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 74. S. 147 – 159.
Singer, E./Endreny, P. (1993): Reporting on risk. New York.
Stallings, R. (1990): Media discourse and the social construction of risk. In: Social Problems. 37. S. 80 – 95.
Stavins, R. (1995): Environmental policy: Better media coverage of risks urged. In: Nieman Reports. 49. S. 12.
Trumbo, C. (1996): Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in U.S. news coverage of an environmental issue. In: Public Understanding of Science. 5. S. 269 – 283.
Ungar, S. (1992): The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. In: The Sociological Quarterly. 33. S. 483 – 501.
Ungar, S. (1995): Social scares and global warming: Beyond the Rio convention. In: Society and Natural Resources. 8. S. 443 – 456.
Weber, G. (1996): Global warming: The rest of the story. Wiesbaden.
Wilkins, L. (1993): Between facts and values: Print media coverage of the greenhouse effect. 1987–1990. In: Public Understanding of Science. 2. S. 71 – 84.
Wilkins, L./Patterson, P. (1991): Science as symbol: The media chills the greenhouse effect. In: Wilkins/Patterson ( 1991 ): 159 – 176.
Wilkins, L./Patterson, P. (1991) (Eds.): Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy Westport, CT.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nitz, M.E. (2001). Media Coverage of Environmental Issues. In: Kleinsteuber, H.J. (eds) Aktuelle Medientrends in den USA. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07786-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07786-2_18
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13494-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-07786-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive