Advertisement

Aligning the Technology and Management Models: Business Process Management and Standard Software Solutions

  • Thomas Gulledge

Abstract

For many years, our approach to organizational management was bound by the suboptimization of collections of enterprise business processes. Business processoriented solutions were difficult to obtain and implement, primarily because organizations were not engineered for business process management. While process management was intuitive to industrial engineers, organizational structures were hierarchical, and information systems were aligned with the vertical hierarchy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Augustine, J.; Aspinwall, P. (IBM’s Approach 1999): IBM’s Approach to Reengineering, from a Development Reengineering Perspective, in: Elzinga, D. J.; Gulledge, T. R.; Lee, Chung-Yee (Eds.): Business Process Engineering: Advancing the State of the Art. Boston 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Born, G. (Process Management 1994): Process Management to Quality Improvement, Chichester 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Davenport, T. H.; Short, J. E. (Industrial Engineering 1990): The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, in: The Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31 (1990), No. 4, p. 11–27.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, M. (Condor Federal 1999): Condor Federal Gets Boost from Navy Win, in: Washington Technology, Vol. (14 September 13, 1999), pp. 52–54 [Available at the following URL: http://www.wtonline.com/vol14_no12/netplex/776–1.html].Google Scholar
  5. Grass, I. E. (Processing and Operation Planning 1956): Processing and Operation Planning, in: Maynard, H. B. (Ed.): Industrial Engineering Handbook, New York 1956.Google Scholar
  6. Hammer, M.; Champy, J. (Reengineering the Corporation 1993): Reengineering the Corporation, New York 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Hammer, M.; Stanton, S.(How Process Enterprises 1999): How Process Enterprises Really Work, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77 (1999), No. 6, pp. 108–18.Google Scholar
  8. Hewett, J. (Transforming IBM 2000): Transforming IBM Through Business Processes, in: Presentation to the Strategic Planning Offsite, Naval Air Systems Command, April 18, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Keller, G.; Teufel, T. (SAP R/3 Process 1998): SAP R/3 Process Oriented Implementation, Harlow, England 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Kirchmer, M. (Business Process Oriented Implementation 1999): Business Process Oriented Implementation of Standard Software, New York 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maggiola, J. C. (Transforming IBM 2000): Transforming IBM Business Processes and Erp, Presentation to the Enterprise Solutions Program Office, Naval Air Systems Command, April 5, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. McHugh, P.; Merli, G.; Wheeler, W. A. (III, Beyond Business Process Reengineering 1995): III, Beyond Business Process Reengineering: Towards the Holonic Enterprise, Chichester 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Mullee, W. R.; Porter, D. B. (Process Chart Procedures 1956): Process Chart Procedures, in: Maynard, H. B. (Ed.): Industrial Engineering Handbook. New York 1956.Google Scholar
  14. Ould, M. A. (Business Processes 1995): Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Reengineering and Improvement, Chichester 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts, L. (Process Reengineering 1994): Process Reengineering: The Key to Achieving Breakthrough Success, Milwaukee 1994.Google Scholar
  16. Rummler, G. A.; Brache, A. P. (Improving Performance 1990): Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart. San Francisco 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Snowdon, J. L. (Dynamic Simulation for Business Process 1999): Dynamic Simulation for Business Process Redesign, in: Elzinga, D. J.; Gulledge, T. R.; Lee, Chung-Yee (Eds.): Business Process Engineering: Advancing the State of the Art. Boston 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Gulledge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations