Skip to main content

Designing Transformation and Intervention Processes

  • Chapter

Abstract

Most of the problems commonly encountered in designing intervention processes centre, in principle, around one question, “Which actor can intervene with which strategies and instruments, and at what time in any particular situation of conflict?” Scholars and practitioners have sought to answer this question by employing a single page graphic matrix depicting an intervention framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference and Further Reading

  • Bercovitch, J. 1992. Mediation in International Relations, London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CAII 2000. Conflict Prevention, A Guide, online: http://www.caii-dc.com (accessed 9.10.2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Community 1993. Manual: Project Cycle Management, An Integrated Approach and Logical Framework, Brussels: European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus, V. 2000. “Community Mobilisation as a Tool for Peacebuilding,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. and L. Keashly 1991. “The Potential Complementarity of Mediation and Consultation within a Contingency Model of Third-Party Intervention,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzduff, M. 2000. “First and Second Track Diplomacy in Northern Ireland,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information, Training and Development (ITAD) Ltd 1999. Project Cycle Management Training Handbook, Sussex: ITAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. 2000. “Intractable Conflict Resolution in the Middle East,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit. , 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiboer, M. 1994. “Ripeness of Conflict: A Fruitful Notion?” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 31, No.1, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. 2001. “Zur Vermittlung und Entsendung ziviler Fachkräfte,” in Zivile Konfliktbearbeitung. Eine internationale Herausforderung (Band 8 der Schriftenreihe des Österreichischen Studienzentrums für Frieden und Konfliktlösung), Münster: agenda Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruhonja, K. 2000. “Motivation and Qualifications,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummenacher, H. and S. Schmeidl 1999. “FAST: An Integrated and Interactive Early Warning,” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, Vol. 24, No.3, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M. S. 1996. Preventing Violent Conflict, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M. S. and A. Mehler 1999. Peace-Building and Conflict Prevention in Development Countries. A Practical Guide, Ebenhausen: CPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, A. and C. Ribeaux 1999. Krisenprävention und Konfliktbearbeitung in der Technischen Zusammenarbeit (Schriftenreihe der GTZ No. 269), Wiesbaden: Universum Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, H., O. Ramsbotham and T. Woodhouse 1999. Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott Foundation 1999. Reaching for Peace: Lessons Learned from the Mott Foundation, Flint, MI: Charles Steward Mott Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE, 2000. Field of Expertise: General Minimum Requirements (Semi-final version), Vienna: OSCE Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. 1998. Konflikttransformation durch Vermittlung, Mainz: M. Grünewald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. 2000a. “Thirteen Characteristics of Successful Mediation in Mozambique,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. 2000b. “Conclusions: Peacebuilding: A Comprehensive Learning Process,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. 2001 (forthcoming). “Community-based Bottom-up Peacebuilding,” Horn of Africa Series, Uppsala: Life and Peace Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. and L. Reychler 2000. Peacebuilding: A Field Guide, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Responding to Conflict 1999. Working with Conflicts. Skills and Strategies for Action, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L. 2000. “Conceptual Framework,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smillie, I. and H. Helmich 1999. Stakeholders. Government-NGO Partnerships for International Development, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelten, A. 1999. Instrumente zur Erfassung von Konflikt- und Krisenpotentialen in Partnerländern der Entwicklungspolitik (Forschungsberichte des BMZ, No. 126), Bonn: Weltforum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. J. 1991. Peacemaking in Civil War: International Mediation in Zimbabwe, 974–1980, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J. 2000. “Designing Training Programmes,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truger, A. 2000. “Training Peacebuilders and Peacekeepers,”in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehr, P. 1978. “Citizen Values and Forest Policymaking,” Western Sociological Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehr, P. 1979. Conflict Regulation, Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, J. 2000. “Training Humanitarian Aid Workers,” in Paffenholz and Reychler, op. cit., 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, W. I. 1989. Ripe for Resolution, Conflict and Intervenbtion in Africa, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alex Austin Martina Fischer Norbert Ropers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paffenholz, T. (2004). Designing Transformation and Intervention Processes. In: Austin, A., Fischer, M., Ropers, N. (eds) Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05642-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05642-3_8

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3940-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-05642-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics