Skip to main content

Abstract

In his introductory discussion on ideology and utopia K. Mannheim has made an interesting remark. Namely, he has written that there are evidently some historical points “where the movement of life itself, especially in its greatest crisis, elevates itself above itself and becomes aware of its own limits” 1, pointing out that the historical course of social life is not located in a more or less homogenous, equally distributed social time and that the movement of social life arranges sometimes such historical situations that clearly show the inherent nature of some important social phenomena and make almost palpable the deep-going consequences of some social structures. This remark may be turned into a general statement that there are privileged historical situations and privileged social circumstances — particularly of deep crisis, very complex and extended, extremely dynamic and highly open and problematic in possible outcomes — that make clearly visible some very important characteristics of some social phenomena that in other circumstances remain hidden and unvisible. Such historical situations are very relevant to test the scope and adequacy of different theoretical approach to some important phenomena that belong to human social world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. W. Adorno, Neutralized religion and its functions, in: Sociology and religion, Englewood Cliffs 1969, p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Fromm, Psychoanalysis and religion, p. 28/29, quoted in: H. Carrier, E. Pin, Essais de sociologie religieuse, Paris 1967, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Buvar, Socioloiki presjek jugoslavenskog drustva (A sociological survey of the Yugoslav society), Zagreb 1970, str. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen 1947, S. 815. For the history of the relations between the state and the Catholic Church see: Z. Roter, Katolicka crkva i drzava u socijalistickoj Jugoslaviji (The Catholic Church and the state in socialist Yugoslavia), in: Pogledi, 2/1970/4–5, str. 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Greinacher, La concezione del mondo della teologia cattolica dal punto di vista della sociologia della conoscenza, In: Rivista internazionale di dialogo, 2 (1969) 2, pp. 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. W. Gouldner, The Coming crisis of Western sociology, New York 1970, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Pascual, Das Ende der Ideologien, In: Neue Deutsche Hefte (1955), S. 592.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See: K. Rahner, Marxistische Utopie und christliche Zukunft des Menschen, In: Garaudy, Metz, Rahner, Der Dialog, Reinbek bei Hamburg 1966, S. 9–26, and J. M. Gonzales-Ruis, Il Cristianesimo non e un umanesimo, Assisi 1968, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kerievan, Nekateri aspekti odnosa urbanizacija — tradicionalna religiosnost (Some aspects of the problem urbanization and the traditional religiosity) 1971, str. 3 (Mimeographed paper presented at IV Annual Meeting of the Yugoslav Association of Sociology).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Bahtijarevié, Socijalistiéko drultvo, crkva i religija (The socialist society, Church and religion), Zagreb 1969, str. 20. For empirical data describing the religious situation in Yugoslavia see also: B. Bolnjak. S. Bahtijarevié, Porodica u transformaciji — crkva, religija (The family in transformation — Church and religion), Zagreb 1970, str. 212+ 25+ VXI (with English summary); Z. Roter, Socialisticna druzba in religija (The socialist society and religion), In: Izbor socioloskih razprav, Ljubljana 1970, str. 189–205; M. Tavear, Mladi in religija (The Youth and religion), In: op. cit., str. 214–222; E. Cimie, Socijalistiéko drustvo i religija (The socialist society and religion), Sarajevo 1966, str. 335; S. Vrcan, Religioznost splitskih srednjoskolaca i studenata (The religiosity of the high schools pupils and university students in Split), In: Skolski vjesnik, 19 (1969) 5–6, str. 28–52; Z. Roter, Znaeaj in struktura (ne) religioznosti u Sloveniji (The importance and the structure of [non] religiosity in Slovenia), In Teorija in praksa, 6 (1969) 4, str. 560–582; Z. Roter, Vloga Cerkve in javno mnenje (The Role of the Church and the public opinion), In: Teorija in praksa, 6 (1969) 5, str. 808–820; M. Kerlievan, Religioznost in druzbenopolitiena staliséa (The religiosity and political opinions), In: Teorija in praksa, 6 (1969) 2, str. 307–321; M. Tavear, Nekatera zapaznja in premisljanja o religiji na vasi (Some observations and considerations about the religion in rural areas), In: Problemi (1967) 50; Z. Mlinar, Verska aktivnost in tradicija na vasi (Religious activity and tradition in villages), In: Problemi (1967) 50; R. Lesnik, Nedeljniki v ljubljanski nadlkofiji (Sunday church-goers in the province of Ljubljana Archbishop), In: Cerkev v sedanjem svetu (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Industria e religione, Brescia 1969, p. 429.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For the same phenomenon in the Soviet Union see: A. S. Klibanov, Nauclnoorganizacionnyj i metodiceskij opyt konkretnyh issledovanij religioznosti, In: Konkretnye issledovanija sovremennyh religioznyh verovanij, Moskva 1967, str. 12/13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Marx, F. Engels, Werke, Bd. 1, Berlin 1961, S. 378. It is interesting to compare Marx’ approach in „Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie“ with the approach in O. Klohr, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. M. Aptekman, Pri6iny zivucesti religioznogo obrjada krescenija v sovremennyh uslovijah, In: Voprosy filosofii (1965) 3, str. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ObMestvo i religija, Moskva 1967, str. 476. The same is visible in: L. N. Mitrohin, O metodologii issledovanij sovremennoj religioznosti, In: Konkretnye issledovanija sovremennyh verovanij, str. 48/49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vrcan, S. (1971). Some Theoretical Implications of the Religiosity as a Mass Phenomenon in a Contemporary Socialist Society. In: Religion und Sozialer Wandel Und andere Arbeiten / Religion and Social Change And other Essays. Internationales Jahrbuch für Religionssoziologie / International Yearbook for the Sociology of Religion, vol 7. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01713-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01713-4_8

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-663-01714-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-01713-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics