Skip to main content

Turkish Industry and the Common Market

  • Chapter
Turkey and the European Community

Part of the book series: Schriften des Deutschen Orient-Instituts ((ORIENT))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

The military regime which governed Turkey between September 1980 and December 1983 proclaimed on several occasions that, once democratic government had been restored, Turkey would submit an application for rapid accession to Community membership. In the election campaign of 1983, Mr. Turgut Özal’s Motherland Party appeared to soft-pedal the idea of immediate membership. Following the Motherland Party’s election victory, Mr. Özal’s government programme mentioned full membership only as an “ultimate aim”: in the meantime, he announced “we shall act in a spirit of considering the balance of interests as a basis at all stages”.1 However, by the beginning of 1987, Özal’s government appeared to be sufficiently satisfied by the economic progress it had made to be preparing to submit a formal application for membership during that year. On the other hand, the government, as well as the Turkish business community, evidently realised that the process of negotia tion would be a long one, and that time would be needed to prepare the Turkish economy for accession. In fact, the year 2000 was usually mentioned as the earliest date at which this could be achieved — even assuming all the other obstacles, both political and economic, could be overcome.

This Chapter is a revised version of the author’s paper, “Turkish Industry and the EEC”, published in Orient, 26. Jahrgang (no. 2, Juni 1985), pp. 168–180.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Statement at Özal’s press conference of 7 January 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.e., goods in Chapters 25–99 of the Brussels Tariff Nomenclature (B.T.N.), with the exception of cotton: Turkey-EEC Relations 1963–1977 (Ankara: Office of the Commission of the European Communities, 1977) p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The texts of the Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol appear in Official Journal of the European Communities, Information and Notices, Vol. 16, no. C. 133 (24 December 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Additional Protocol, Annexes 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.T.N. positions 50.01 and 50.02; Additional Protocol, Annex 2, Article 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Additional Protocol, Articles 12 and 16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., Articles 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taking 1973 as 100, the indices for 1980 were as follows: employment 74.6; output 95.3; exports 115.9; imports 212.2. Source: Avrupa Ekonomik Toplulugu Özel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu (Ankara, State Planning Organisation, 1983), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in, Financial Times Survey, Turkey, 17 May 1983, p. XII.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See for instance the statement by Güngör Yener, Chairman of the Ankara Chamber of Commerce, quoted in Milliyet and Trcüman, 21 March, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Figure for 1983. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 1984, (London: British Petroleum, 1984), pp. 4,7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. An exception is that of the metal products industry, which is labour-intensive but has fairly substantial net imports. This is probably due to the fact that this sector embraces a wide range of products, some of which are not produced in Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Özel Ihtisas KKomisyonu Raporu, op.cit., pp. 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Source: State Planning Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Bertil Walstedt, State Manufacturing Enterprise in a Mixed Economy: the Turkish Case (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, for World Bank, 1980), pp. 144–151, 330.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Source: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calculated from Review of Economic Conditions, 1984/IV (Ankam: Türkiye Iş Bankasi), p. 33 and NIMEXE, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Figures are for 1982; data supplied by State Institute of Statistics, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  20. NIMEXE, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hürriyet, 26 July 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Another contributory factor was the revival of the domestic construction industry, and here of demand for cement: in fact, Turkey began to make small imports of cement in 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milliyet, 18 January 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Beş Yillik Kallanma Plani, 1985–1989 (Ankara: State Planning Organisation, 1984), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ahmet Evin Geoffrey Denton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hale, W. (1990). Turkish Industry and the Common Market. In: Evin, A., Denton, G. (eds) Turkey and the European Community. Schriften des Deutschen Orient-Instituts. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01422-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01422-5_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-0646-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-01422-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics