Abstract
Many power indices on simple games have been defined trying to measure, under different points of view, the “a priori” importance of a voter in a collective binary voting scenario. A unified probabilistic way to define some of these power indices is considered in this paper. We show that six well-known power indices are obtained under such a probabilistic approach. Moreover, some new power indices can naturally be obtained in this way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso-Meijide, J.M., Freixas, J.: A new power index based on minimal winning coalitions without any surplus. Decis. Support Syst. 49(1), 70–76 (2010)
Alonso-Meijide, J.M., Freixas, J., Molinero, X.: Computation of several indices by generating functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(8), 3395–3402 (2012)
Banzhaf, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. 19(2), 317–343 (1965)
Carreras, F., Freixas, J.: Complete simple games. Math. Soc. Sci. 32(2), 139–155 (1996)
Coleman, J.S.: Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act. In: Lieberman, B. (ed.) Social Choice, pp. 269–300. Gordon and Breach, New York (1971)
Deegan, J., Packel, E.W.: A new index of power for simple \(n\)-person games. Int. J. Game Theory 7, 113–123 (1978)
Einy, E.: The desirability relation of simple games. Math. Soc. Sci. 10(2), 155–168 (1985)
Einy, E., Lehrer, E.: Regular simple games. Int. J. Game Theory 18, 195–207 (1989)
Freixas, J., Marciniak, D., Pons, M.: On the ordinal equivalence of the Johnston, Banzhaf and Shapley power indices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216(2), 367–375 (2012)
Holler, M.J.: Forming coalitions and measuring voting power. Polit. Stud. 30, 262–271 (1982)
Isbell, J.R.: A class of simple games. Duke Math. J. 25(3), 423–439 (1958)
Johnston, R.J.: On the measurement of power: some reactions to Laver. Environ. Plann. A 10(8), 907–914 (1978)
Penrose, L.S.: The elementary statistics of majority voting. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 109(1), 53–57 (1946)
Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 48(3), 787–792 (1954)
Taylor, A.D.: Mathematics and Politics: Strategy, Voting, Power and Proof, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77645-3
Taylor, A.D., Zwicker, W.S.: Simple Games: Desirability Relations, Trading, and Pseudoweightings. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1999)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by funds from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and from the European Union (FEDER funds) under grant MTM2015–66818-P(MINECO/FEDER).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freixas, J., Pons, M. (2019). A Probabilistic Unified Approach for Power Indices in Simple Games. In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Mercik, J., Motylska-Kuźma, A. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXIV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60555-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60555-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-60554-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-60555-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)