Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Häufig gestellte Fragen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Peer Instruction in der Mathematik

  • 1282 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel beantwortet von neuen Nutzern und Interessierten häufig gestellte Fragen zur Integration von Peer Instruction in die Lehrveranstaltung, zur Durchführung, Wirksamkeit, Fragenformulierung und Technologie.

Kann so etwas auch in der Klausur drankommen?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Direnga, J., Brose, A., & Kautz, C. (2015). Auswirkung verschiedener Lehrformate auf das konzeptionelle Verständnis im Fach Statik. In F. Waldherr & C. Walter (Hrsg.), Tagungsband zum 2. HD MINT Symposium 2015 (S. 216–223).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, K. E., Strauss, E. A., Downey, N., Galbraith, A., Jeanne, R., & Cooper, S. (2010). Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(2), 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., et al. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, C. (2017). Improving how universities teach science: Lessons from the science education initiative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Medieninformatik, Hochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbüttel, Wolfenbüttel, Deutschland

    Peter Riegler

Authors
  1. Peter Riegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Riegler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riegler, P. (2019). Häufig gestellte Fragen. In: Peer Instruction in der Mathematik. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60510-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation