Advertisement

QoS Preservation in Web Service Selection

  • Adrija BhattacharyaEmail author
  • Sankhayan Choudhury
Chapter
  • 158 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11610)

Abstract

In cloud computing domain, often service providers offer services with same functionalities, but with varying quality metrics. A suitable service selection method finds the most appropriate solution among the alternatives. The challenge is to deliver a solution satisfying the requirement (quality and other) of a consumer with minimum possible execution time. Many conflicting QoS objectives increase the complexity of the problem. In fact, the problem may be formulated as a multi-objective, NP-hard optimization problem. Most of the existing solutions either satisfies the QoS demands of consumer or only reduces execution time by considering a sub-set of required QoS metrics. Consumer’s feedback on the choice of required QoS metrics not only shall help increasing user satisfaction, but also may reduce the complexity effectively. However, this depends on the domain knowledge of a consumer. In this work, we have proposed a goodness measure that replaces all QoS metrics by a single one. The new technique using dimension reduction is proposed to offer significant improvement compared to the existing works in terms of execution time. Moreover, the solution satisfies all the QoS requirements of a consumer in most of the cases. The proposed data driven selection approach has been implemented and the experimental results substantiate the claims as mentioned.

Keywords

QoS Goodness Service selection Factor analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication is an outcome of the R&D work undertaken in the ITRA project of Media Lab Asia entitled Remote Health: A Framework for Healthcare Services using Mobile and Sensor-Cloud Technologies.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Masri, E., Mahmoud, Q.H.: QoS-based discovery and ranking of web services. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks. ICCCN 2007, pp. 529–534. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barkat Ullah, A.S., Sarker, R., Cornforth, D.: Search space reduction technique for constrained optimization with tiny feasible space. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 881–888. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacharya, A., Choudhury, S.: An efficient service selection approach through a goodness measure of the participating QoS. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics and Analytics, ICIA 2016, pp. 94:1–94:6, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2980258.2980451. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2980258.2980451
  4. 4.
    Chen, L., Wu, J., Jian, H., Deng, H., Wu, Z.: Instant recommendation for web services composition. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 7(4), 586–598 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dastjerdi, A.V., Garg, S.K., Rana, O.F., Buyya, R.: CloudPick: a framework for QoS-aware and ontology-based service deployment across clouds. Softw. Pract. Exp. 45(2), 197–231 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dou, W., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Chen, J.: Hiresome-II: towards privacy-aware cross-cloud service composition for big data applications. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 26(2), 455–466 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elshater, Y., Elgazzar, K., Martin, P.: goDiscovery: web service discovery made efficient. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 711–716. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fodor, I.K.: A survey of dimension reduction techniques. Technical report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA (US) (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jatoth, C., Gangadharan, G., Fiore, U., Buyya, R.: QoS-aware big service composition using mapreduce based evolutionary algorithm with guided mutation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 86, 1008–1018 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jurca, R., Faltings, B., Binder, W.: Reliable QoS monitoring based on client feedback. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1003–1012. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karim, R., Ding, C., Miri, A.: An end-to-end QoS mapping approach for cloud service selection. In: 2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on Services, pp. 341–348. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, A., Ishikawa, F., Honiden, S.: Towards network-aware service composition in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 959–968. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194(36), 3902–3933 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ludwig, S.A.: Clonal selection based genetic algorithm for workflow service selection. In: 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tao, F., LaiLi, Y., Xu, L., Zhang, L.: FC-PACO-RM: a parallel method for service composition optimal-selection in cloud manufacturing system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 9(4), 2023–2033 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tao, F., Zhao, D., Hu, Y., Zhou, Z.: Resource service composition and its optimal-selection based on particle swarm optimization in manufacturing grid system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 4(4), 315–327 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ye, Z., Zhou, X., Bouguettaya, A.: Genetic algorithm based QoS-aware service compositions in cloud computing. In: Yu, J.X., Kim, M.H., Unland, R. (eds.) DASFAA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6588, pp. 321–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20152-3_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, Q., Bouguettaya, A.: Computing service skyline from uncertain QoWS. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 3(1), 16–29 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, J., Liu, X.: Evaluation and optimization of QoS-aware network management framework based on process synergy and resource allocation. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput., 1–9 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, X., Dou, W.: Preference-aware QoS evaluation for cloud web service composition based on artificial neural networks. In: Wang, F.L., Gong, Z., Luo, X., Lei, J. (eds.) WISM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6318, pp. 410–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16515-3_51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, X., Wen, Z., Li, X.: QoS-aware web service selection with negative selection algorithm. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 40(2), 349–373 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng, Z., Ma, H., Lyu, M.R., King, I.: QoS-aware web service recommendation by collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 4(2), 140–152 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringHeritage Institute of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations