Abstract
The intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex amalgam of physical and cognitive workflows of its various personnel. The ICU team is compiled of persons with widely varying scopes of practice, levels of experience, roles, and responsibilities. Basic categories of personnel include bedside nurse, charge nurse, resident, advanced practice provider, pharmacist, nutritionist, fellow, attending, and consultant. Together, team members must collaborate to learn about and stabilize the critically ill patient, diagnose clinical states, plan and execute treatment, and monitor illness and recovery. The disparate geography and workflow of each individual guarantees that communication between team members will be complex. Issues of collaboration, teamwork, communication, and workflow are therefore paramount.
Team members may interact with the same technology with fundamentally different purposes, aligned with their scope of practice. The study of distributed cognition and how it affects interaction with health information technology (HIT) can better inform standards of its development. In every local ICU and hospital environment, the transmission of information is accomplished in unique combinations of verbal, paper, and electronic methods. When alterations occur in these highly evolved communication ecosystems (such as the introduction of new members or implementation of new electronic systems), the sturdiness of its homeostasis is tested, and patient safety can be put at risk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995.
Zhang J, Norman DA. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci. 1994;18(1):87–122.
Bricon-Souf N, Renard JM, Beuscart R. Dynamic workflow model for complex activity in intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform. 1999;53(2–3):143–50.
Malhotra S, Jordan D, Shortliffe E, Patel VL. Workflow modeling in critical care: piecing together your own puzzle. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(2):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2006.06.002.
Cohen T, Blatter B, Almeida C, Shortliffe E, Patel V. A cognitive blueprint of collaboration in context: distributed cognition in the psychiatric emergency department. Artif Intell Med. 2006;37(2):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2006.03.009.
Alvarez G, Coiera E. Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(10):791–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.017.
Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL. The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(11–12):801–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.019.
Westbrook JI, Ampt A, Kearney L, Rob MI. All in a day’s work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time. Med J Aust. 2008;188(9):506–9.
Edwards A, Fitzpatrick LA, Augustine S, Trzebucki A, Cheng SL, Presseau C, Mersmann C, Heckman B, Kachnowski S. Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(9):629–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.006.
Weigl M, Muller A, Zupanc A, Glaser J, Angerer P. Hospital doctors’ workflow interruptions and activities: an observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(6):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.043281.
Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Turley JP, Zhang J. Initiators of interruption in workflow: the role of MDs and RNs. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:103–9.
Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Turley JP, Zhang J. The roles of MDs and RNs as initiators and recipients of interruptions in workflow. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):e109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.08.007.
Kalisch BJ, Aebersold M. Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(3):126–32.
Hopkinson SG, Jennings BM. Interruptions during nurses’ work: a state-of-the-science review. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36(1):38–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21515.
Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT. Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):304–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.033282.
Biron AD, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Loiselle CG. Characteristics of work interruptions during medication administration. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(4):330–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01300.x.
Kreckler S, Catchpole K, Bottomley M, Handa A, McCulloch P. Interruptions during drug rounds: an observational study. Br J Nurs. 2008;17(21):1326–30. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.21.31732.
Palese A, Sartor A, Costaperaria G, Bresadola V. Interruptions during nurses’ drug rounds in surgical wards: observational study. J Nurs Manag. 2009;17(2):185–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00835.x.
Potter P, Wolf L, Boxerman S, Grayson D, Sledge J, Dunagan C, Evanoff B. Understanding the cognitive work of nursing in the acute care environment. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(7–8):327–35.
Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, Dunsmuir WT, Day RO. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(8):683–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Electronic health records and meaningful use. 2010. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.ptopen=512&objID=2996&parentname=CommunityPage&parentid=1&mode=2&in_hi_userid=10741&cached=true. Accessed 14 Jul 2010.
Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(Suppl 1):S21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.017.
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–52.
Fischer JS, Blonde L. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes practice workflow. Clin Diabet. 1999;17:89–90.
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.17226/10027.
Dansky KH, Gamm LD, Vasey JJ, Barsukiewicz CK. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? J Healthc Manag. 1999;44(6):440–454; discussion 454–5.
Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale JF. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(6):569–85.
Rogers ML. The socio-technical impact of electronic medical records on the work activities and work processes in a small clinic. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management (ODAM), Maui, Hawaii; 2005. p. 22–5.
Patterson ES, Cook RI, Render ML. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(5):540–53.
Cook RI, Woods DD. Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Hum Factors. 1996;38(4):593–613. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778827224.
Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, Render ML, Orshansky G, Asch SM. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):438–47. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1777.
Ornstein SM. Electronic medical records in family practice: the time is now. J Fam Pract. 1997;44(1):45–8.
Elson RB, Connelly DP. Computerized patient records in primary care. Their role in mediating guideline-driven physician behavior change. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(8):698–705.
Reddy M, Seeraty C, Lin T, et al. Effects of computer-based patient records on physician-patient interactions: physicians’ perspectives. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000 Nov 3–7, Los Angeles, CA. 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2243999/.
Phansalkar S, Edworthy J, Hellier E, Seger DL, Schedlbauer A, Avery AJ, Bates DW. A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(5):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.005264.
Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(2):94–101.
Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505–16. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1700.
Patterson ES, Roth EM, Render ML. Handoffs during nursing shift changes in acute care. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 11. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2005. p. 1057–61.
Zhang J, Patel VL, Johnson KA, et al. Designing human-centered distributed information systems. IEEE Intell Syst. 2002;17:42–7.
Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):542–9. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2384.
Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(2):104–12. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1471.
Voshell M, Woods DD, Phillips F. Overcoming the keyhole in human-robot coordination: simulation and evaluation. In: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2005. p. 442–6.
Balka E. Ghost charts and shadow records: implication for system design. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(1):686–90.
Wears RL. The chart is dead—long live the chart. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(4):390–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.04.005.
Morrison C, Jones M, Blackwell A, Vuylsteke A. Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R148. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7134.
Morrison C, Fitzpatrick G, Blackwell A. Multi-disciplinary collaboration during ward rounds: embodied aspects of electronic medical record usage. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(8):e96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.007.
Nielsen J. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA: ACM; 1992. p. 373–80.
Saparova D, Basic J, Lu Y, et al. Usability problems in patient- and clinician-oriented health information systems: what are they and how do they differ? In: Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Healthcare and safety of the environment and transport. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 276–85.
Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ. 1998;316(7132):673–6.
Fitzpatrick LA, Melnikas AJ, Weathers M, Kachnowski SW. Understanding communication capacity. Communication patterns and ICT usage in clinical settings. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2008;22(3):34–41.
Wu R, Rossos P, Quan S, Reeves S, Lo V, Wong B, Cheung M, Morra D. An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e59. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1655.
Patterson ES, Woods DD, Cook RI, Render ML. Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience. Cogn Tech Work. 2007;9(3):155–62.
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In: Sutton RS, Staw BM, editors. Research in organizational behavior, vol. 1. Stanford: Jai Press; 1999. p. 81–123.
Wu RC, Tran K, Lo V, O’Leary KJ, Morra D, Quan SD, Perrier L. Effects of clinical communication interventions in hospitals: a systematic review of information and communication technology adoptions for improved communication between clinicians. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(11):723–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, S., Rogers, M.L. (2020). Intensive Care Unit Collaboration and Workflow in the Information Age. In: De Georgia, M., Loparo, K. (eds) Neurocritical Care Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59307-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59307-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-59305-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-59307-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)