Skip to main content

Evaluation of Deep Autoencoders for Prediction of Adjustment Points in the Mass Production of Sensors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning for Cyber Physical Systems

Part of the book series: Technologien für die intelligente Automation ((TIA,volume 11))

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of Industry 4.0 the inclusion of additional information from the manufacturing process is a challenging approach. This is demonstrated by an example of calibration process optimization in the mass production of automotive sensor modules. It is investigated to replace a part of a measurement set by prediction. Support-vector regression compared to multiple, linear regression model shows only minor improvements. Feature reduction by deep autoencoders was carried out, but failed to achieve further improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • [1] Vincent, Larochelle, Lajoie, Bengio, Manzagol (2010) Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network. J Machine Learning Research 11: 3371-3408

    Google Scholar 

  • [2] Možek, et al. “Adaptive Calibration and Quality Control of Smart Sensors.” Applications and Experiences of Quality Control. InTech, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • [3] Bengio, Lamblin, Popovici, Larochelle. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Adv neural inform proc syst (NIPS) 2007;19:153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • [4] Cho, Tapani, Ihler. Enhanced gradient and adaptive learning rate for training restricted Boltzmann machines. Proc 28th Int Conf Machine Learning (ICML-11) 2011:105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • [5] Vapnik, and Chervonenkis. “A note on one class of perceptrons.” Automation and remote control 25.1 (1964): 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • [6] Vapnik. “The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory.” (1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • [7] Aronszajn. “Theory of reproducing kernels.” Trans American mathem society 68.3 (1950): 337-404.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [8] Smola , et. al. “A tutorial on support vector regression.” Statistics and computing 14.3 (2004): 199-222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [9] Fröhlich, Zell. “Efficient parameter selection for support vector machines in classification and regression via model-based global optimization.” Neural Networks, 2005. IJCNN’05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Lachmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lachmann, M., Stark, T., Golz, M., Manske, E. (2020). Evaluation of Deep Autoencoders for Prediction of Adjustment Points in the Mass Production of Sensors. In: Beyerer, J., Maier, A., Niggemann, O. (eds) Machine Learning for Cyber Physical Systems. Technologien für die intelligente Automation, vol 11. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59084-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics