Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Psychotherapie pp 161–191Cite as

Forschung in der Psychotherapie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 20k Accesses

Part of the book series: Basiswissen Psychologie ((BASPSY))

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick, welchen Beitrag die Forschung zum aktuellen Verständnis von Psychotherapie leisten konnte und welche Antworten die Psychotherapieforschung auf ausstehende Fragen zu geben hat. Ausgangspunkt bildet eine historische Perspektive auf die Entwicklung der Psychotherapieforschung anhand ausgewählter Forschungsbeiträge. Im zweiten Teil wird geprüft, welche Ergebnisse die Psychotherapieforschung zu zentralen Fragen, wie Therapiedauer, Merkmale eines guten Psychotherapeuten, Verschlechterungen und Nebenwirkungen einer Psychotherapie, beitragen kann. Zum Abschluss findet eine kritische Zusammenfassung statt, aus der hervorgeht, dass die Inhalte und Methoden der Psychotherapieforschung nicht ausschließlich von einem reinen Erkenntnisinteresse geleitet, sondern von Professionalisierungsbestrebungen und Marktorientierung beeinflusst sind. Das Kapitel schließt mit einem Ausblick auf für die Psychotherapieforschung wünschenswerte Weiterentwicklungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Baldwin, S. A., & Zac, E. I. (2013). Therapist effects. Findings and methods. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (6. Aufl., S. 258–297). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, S. A., Atkins, D. C., Olsan, J. A., & Nielsen, S. L. (2009). Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose-effect and good-enough level models of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. P. (2009). Toward a working through of some core conflicts in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19(1), 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. P., Connolly, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., Gladis, M., & Siqueland, L. (2000). Alliance predicts patients’ outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1027–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. P., Luborsky, L., Gallop, R., Crits-Christoph, P., Weiss, R. D., Thase, M. E., et al. (2001). Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 119–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beljouw, I., van Verhaak, P., Cuijpers, P., van Marwijk, H., & Penninx, P. (2010). The course of untreated anxiety and depression, and determinants of poor one-year outcome: A one-year cohort study. BioMed Central Psychiatry, 10, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-86. Zugegriffen am 31.03.2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E., & Garfield, S. L. (1994). Overview, trends, and future issues. In Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4. Aufl., S. 821–830). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A. C., & Wade, G. (2013). The client in psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (6. Aufl., S. 219–257). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carkhuff, R. R. (1969). Human and helping relations (Bd. 1 & 2). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1865/1995). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. Chicago: ColumeOne Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. S. (1955). Effectiveness of psychotherapy: A critique of the spontaneous remission argument. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2(4), 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspar, F., & Jacobi, F. (2007). Psychotherapieforschung. In W. Hiller, E. Leibing, F. Leichsenring & K. D. Sulz (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Psychotherapie für die Ausbildung zum/zur Psychologischen Psychotherapeutin und für die ärztliche Weiterbildung (S. 395–421). München: CIP-Medien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59, 614–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph, P., Gallop, R., Temes, C. M., Ball, S. A., Martino, S., & Caroll, K. C. (2009). The alliance in motivational enhancement therapy and counseling as usual for substance use problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(6), 1125–1135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph, P., Connolly Gibbons, M., & Mukherjee, D. (2013). Process-outcome research. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (6. Aufl., S. 298–340). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Charms, R., Levy, J., & Wertheimer, M. (1954). A note on attempted evaluations of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10, 233–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denker, P. G. (1946). Results of treatment of psychoneuroses by the general practitioner: A follow-up study of 500 cases. New York State Journal of Medicine, 46, 2164–2166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doss, B. D. (2004). Changing the way we study change in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(4), 368–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1991). Five dimensions of therapy process. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research, 20(2), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 319–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flor, H. (2015). Lost in Translation: psychologische Mechanismen und Psychotherapie. Verhaltenstherapie, 25, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, D., & Grawe, K. (2006). General change mechanisms: The relation between problem activation and resource activation in successful and unsuccessful therapeutic interactions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. (2016). On possible consequences of National Institute of Mental Health Funding for psychotherapy research and training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (1992). Psychotherapieforschung zu Beginn der neunziger Jahre. Psychologische Rundschau, 43, 132–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Research on the process of change. In B. M. Strauss, J. P. Barber & L. Castonguay (Hrsg.), Visions in psychotherapy research and practice: Reflections from presidents of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (S. 11–26). Melbourne: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvarth, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K., Kopta, S., Krause, M., & Orlinsky, D. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41(2), 159–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong-Meyer, R., Hautzinger, M., Kühner, C., & Schramm, L. (2007). Evidenzbasierte Leitlinien zur Psychotherapie Affektiver Störungen. In Fachgruppe Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychotherapie (Hrsg.), Evidenzbasierte Leitlinien Psychotherapie (Bd. 1). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research. Psychological Bulletin, 65(2), 110–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Hrsg.), Psychotherapy integration (S. 94–129). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (Hrsg.). (2013). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6. Aufl.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (Hrsg.). (2013a). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6. Aufl., S. 169–218). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (2013b). Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy, 50, 42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Bergin, A. E., & Collins, J. L. (1977). Therapist induced deterioration in psychotherapy patients. In A. S. Gurman & A. A. Razin (Hrsg.), Effective psychotherapy: A handbook of research (S. 452–481). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Shapiro, D. A., & Bergin, A. E. (1986). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3. Aufl., S. 157–212). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, C. A. (1937). Statistical evaluation of psychotherapeutic methods. In L. E. Hinsie (Hrsg.), Concepts and problems of psychotherapy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L. (1954). A note on Eysenck’s article ‚The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation‘. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that „everyone has won and all must have prices“? Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(8), 995–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A.-E. (1990). Eine Taxonomie der bisherigen Psychotherapieforschung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 19(4), 287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neacsiu, A. D., Rizvi, S. L., & Linehan, M. M. (2010). Dialectical behavior therapy skills use as a mediator and outcome of treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(9), 832–839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D. E., Rønnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcomes research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5. Aufl., S. 307–389). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parloff, M. B. (1979). Can psychotherapy research guide the policymaker? American Psychologist, 34, 296–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. L. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffmatter, M., & Tschacher, W. (2016). Klassen allgemeiner Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 45(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. J., & Wilson, G. T. (1980). The effects of psychological therapy (2. Aufl.). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6(3), 412–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1954). A transvaluation of psychotherapy. A reply to Hans Eysenck. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 49(2), 298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A., & Elliott, R. (1986). Are all psychotherapies equivalent? American Psychologist, 41, 165–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, B., Castonguay, L. G., & Barber, J. P. (2015). What the future holds for psychotherapy research. In B. M. Strauss, J. P. Barber & L. Castonguay (Hrsg.), Visions in psychotherapy research and practice: Reflections from presidents of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (S. 364–371). Melbourne: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timulak, L. (2007). Identifying core categories of client-identified impact of helpful events in psychotherapy: A qualitative meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 17(3), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O’Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. J. (2012). On self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B., & Brown, G. S. (2005). Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: A naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 914–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Barber, J. P. (2010). Therapist adherence/competence and treatment outcome: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 200–211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, W. W., Lutz, W., Steffanowski, A., Kriz, D., Glahn, E. M., Völkle, M. C., Böhnke, J. R., Köck, K., Bittermann, A., & Ruprecht, T. (2011). Qualitätsmonitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie: Modellprojekt der Techniker Krankenkasse – Abschlussbericht. Hamburg: Techniker Krankenkasse.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Deutschland

    Mark Helle

Authors
  1. Mark Helle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Helle, M. (2019). Forschung in der Psychotherapie. In: Psychotherapie. Basiswissen Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58712-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58712-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58711-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58712-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation