Skip to main content

Basics of Outcome Assessment in Clinical Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2333 Accesses

Abstract

The tracking of clinical outcomes allows healthcare organizations to identify variations in the delivery of care in order to properly align healthcare practices within an organization. An outcome measure is the result of a test that is used to objectively determine the baseline function of a patient at the beginning of treatment. The most useful outcomes should be measurable based on discrete parameters and time points. Outcomes in healthcare are no longer solely limited to the quality of care provided but also reflect the service as experienced by the patient. Self-reported outcome measures were developed to gather information based on patient experience and perception. Patient-reported outcomes create an environment that fosters shared decision-making. Decisions made with patient input often make the patient feel more at ease because he or she can converse with a clinician about the treatment. With clinical implications at the forefront of outcome research study design, researchers are better equipped to develop the right questions and collect the appropriate data to address the root cause of differences in patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AAOS. Principles of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) reporting: information statement. 2015. https://aaos.org/uploadedFiles/PreProduction/About/Opinion_Statements/advistmt/1044%20Principles%20of%20Patient%20Reported%20Outcome%20Measures%20(PROMs)%20Reporting.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2017.

  2. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010;340:c186. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fautrel B, Alten R, Kirkham B, de la Torre I, Durand F, Barry J, et al. Call for action: how to improve use of patient-reported outcomes to guide clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int;2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4005-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson C, Rocha JL, Lalli T, Irrgang JJ, Hurwitz S, Hogan MV. Developing performance and assessment platforms in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(6):670–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Health Services Research Information Central. Comparative effectiveness research. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/cer.html. Accessed 21 Mar 2018.

  6. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/index.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2018.

  7. MOTION Group. Current concepts review: patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:436–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, et al. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(Suppl 3):66–71. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Segal C, Holve E, Sabharwal R. Collecting and using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR): challenges and opportunities. 2013. http://www.academyhealth.org/files/Collecting%20and%20Using%20PRO%20for%20CER%20and%20PCOR.pdf.

  10. Selecting the Right Measures for Your Report. Agency for healthcare research and quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/talkingquality/create/gather/index.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.

  11. Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, et al. Comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. In: Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smythe L, Giddings LS. From experience to definition: addressing the question: “what is qualitative research?”. Nurs Prax N Z. 2007;23:37–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tinker A. The top 7 outcome measures and 3 measurement essentials. HealthCatalyst. https://www.healthcatalyst.com/The-Top-7-Outcome-Measures-and-3-Measurement-Essentials. Accessed 17 Feb 2008.

  14. Understanding Data Sources. Agency for healthcare research and quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patientsafety/talkingquality/create/understand.html. Accessed 21 March 2018.

  15. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: electronic source data in clinical investigations. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm328691.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2018.

  16. Wang S, Hsu CJ, Trent L, Ryan T, Kearns NT, Civillico EF, et al. Evaluation of performance-based outcome measures for the upper limb: a systematic review. PM&R. 2018;10(9):951–962.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MaCalus V. Hogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chambers, M.C., Tepe, S.M., Boakye, L.A.T., Hogan, M.V. (2019). Basics of Outcome Assessment in Clinical Research. In: Musahl, V., et al. Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58254-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics