Skip to main content

Los Alamos, Trinity, and Tinian

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The History and Science of the Manhattan Project

Part of the book series: Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics ((ULNP))

  • 2670 Accesses

Abstract

The most famous site of the Manhattan Project was the Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico, directed by Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer. Here, physicists, chemists, engineers, and military ordnance specialists worked for over two years to design the Little Boy and Fat Man bombs. This chapter describes how the Laboratory was organized; details of the physics involved in achieving an efficient nuclear explosion; unanticipated problems which nearly rendered the plutonium bomb unworkable; the dramatic Trinity test of the plutonium bomb; the role of British scientists in the Manhattan Project; why the Little Boy and Fat Man bombs had such different designs; the training of air crews to carry out the actual bombing missions; and some of the effects of radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The neglect of inelastic scattering is not as drastic as it may seem. What matters to the growth of the neutron population is the time τ that a neutron will typically travel before causing another fission; see  (7.5). But, if one averages through the many resonance spikes in Fig. 3.12, the fission cross-section for uranium-235 (and plutonium-239 as well) behaves approximately as σ ~ 1/vneut. This means that the mean free path for fission, λf, is proportional to vneut which, overall, makes τ independent of vneut. This means that if a neutron has been either elastically or inelastically scattered, the time for which it will typically travel before causing a subsequent fission is largely independent of its speed. It would then seem that one should also add in the inelastic-scattering cross-section when forming the transport cross-section in (7.3). This is true, but another effect comes into play: elastic scattering is not isotropic. This has the effect of somewhat lowering the effective value of the elastic scattering cross-section. For elements like uranium and plutonium, the two effects largely cancel each other, with the net result that (7.3) is a quite reasonable approximation. Details are given in the Appendix to Serber’s Primer; see also H. Soodak, M. R. Fleishman, I. Pullman and N. Tralli, Reactor Handbook, Volume III Part A: Physics (New York: Interscience Publishers, 1962), Chap. 3.

Further Reading

Books, Journal Articles, and Reports

  • J. Albright, M. Kunstel, Bombshell: The Secret Story of America’s Unknown Atomic Spy Conspiracy (Times Books, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.W. Alvarez, Adventures of a Physicist (Basic Books, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Badash, J.O. Hirschfelder, H.P. Broida (eds.), Reminiscences of Los Alamos 1943-1945 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.T. Bainbridge, Trinity. Los Alamos report LA-6300-H. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs1/00317133.pdf

  • K.T. Bainbridge, Orchestrating the test, in All In Our Time: The Reminiscences of Twelve Nuclear Pioneers, ed. by J. Wilson (The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Chicago, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.E. Barasch, Light Flash Produced by an Atmospheric Nuclear Explosion. Los Alamos Sci. Lab. report LASL 79, 84 (1979). https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs4/00362363.pdf

  • B. Bederson, SEDs at Los Alamos: a personal memoir. Phys. Perspect. 3(1), 52–75 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B. Bernstein, The uneasy alliance: Roosevelt, Churchill, and the atomic bomb, 1940–1945. W. Polit. Q. 29(2), 202–230 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bernstein, Plutonium: A History of the World’s Most Dangerous Element (Joseph Henry Press, Washington, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Bethe, Theory of the Fireball. Los Alamos report LA-3064 (1964) http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs1/00367118.pdf

  • H.A. Bethe, R.F. Christy, Memorandum on the Immediate After Effects of the Gadget. http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1944-Bethe-and-Christy-Memorandum-on-the-Immediate-After-Effects-of-the-Gadget.pdf

  • K. Bird, M.J. Sherwin, American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J (Robert Oppenheimer (Knopf, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Broyles, Nuclear explosions. Am. J. Phys. 50(7), 586–594 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Campbell, The Silverplate Bombers (McFarland & Co., Jefferson, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.P. Carlisle, J.M. Zenzen, Supplying the Nuclear Arsenal: American Production Reactors, 1942–1992 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Chambers, Technically Sweet Los Alamos: The Development of a Federally Sponsored Scientific Community. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Conant, 109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos (Simon and Schuster, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Conant, Man of the Hour: James B. Conant, Warrior Scientist (Simon and Schuster, New York, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Condit, Plutonium: An Introduction. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report UCRL-JC-115357 (1993). www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=10133699

  • J. Coster-Mullen, Atom Bombs: The Top Secret Inside Story of Little Boy and Fat Man (Coster-Mullen, Waukesha, WI, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office: United States Nuclear Tests July 1945 through September 1992. (Report DOE/NV-209 REV 16); http://nnss.gov/docs/docs_LibraryPublications/DOE_NV-209_Rev16.pdf

  • D.F. Dvorak, The Other Atomic Bomb Commander: Colonel Cliff Heflin and his “Special” 216th AAF Base Unit. Air Power History 59(4), 14–27 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Dyson, Disturbing the Universe (Harper and Row, New York, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Fakley, The British Mission. Los Alamos Science 4(7), 186–189 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Farmelo, Churchill’s Bomb: How the United States Overtook Britain in the First Nuclear Arms Race (Basic Books, New York, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fermi, Nuclear Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Ferrell, Harry S. Truman and the Bomb (High Plains Publishing Co., Worland, WY, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Fey, Health Physics Survey of Trinity Site. Los Alamos report LA-3719 (June, 1967) https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/la-pubs/00314894.pdf

  • G.N. Flerov, K.A. Petrzhak, Spontaneous fission of Uranium. Phys. Rev. 58, 89 (1940)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (United States Department of Defense and Energy Research and Development Agency, Washington, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Goodchild, Robert Oppenheimer: Shatterer of Worlds (British Broadcasting Corporation, London, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Groves, Now It Can be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project (Da Capo Press, New York, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Hansen, J.C. Rodgers, Radiological Survey and Evaluation of the Fallout Area from the Trinity Test. Los Alamos report LA-10256-MS (June, 1985) https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/la-pubs/00318776.pdf

  • S.K. Hanson, A.D. Pollington, C.R. Waidmann, W.S. Kinman, A.M. Wende, J.L. Miller, J.A. Berger, W.J. Oldham, H.D. Selby, Measurements of extinct fission products in nuclear bomb debris: determination of the yield of the Trinity test 70 y later. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 113(29), 8104–8108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Hawkins, Manhattan District History. Project Y: The Los Alamos Project. Volume I: Inception until August 1945. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (1947). Los Alamos publication LAMS-2532, available online at https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs1/00103803.pdf

  • R.G. Hewlett, O.E. Anderson Jr., A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Vol. 1: The New World, 1939/1946 (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Hoddeson, P.W. Henriksen, R.A. Meade, C. Westfall, Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos during the Oppenheimer Years (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hull, A. Bianco, Rider of the Pale Horse: A Memoir of Los Alamos and Beyond (University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hunner, Inventing Los Alamos: The Growth of an Atomic Community (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Irving, The Virus House: Germany’s Atomic Research and Allied Counter-Measures (Focal Point Publications, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • V.C. Jones, United States Army in World War II: Special Studies—Manhattan: The Army and the Atomic Bomb (Center of Military History, United States Army, Washington, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Kathren, J.B. Gough, G.T. Benefiel, The Plutonium Story: The Journals of Professor Glenn T. Seaborg 1939–1946 (Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 1994). An abbreviated version prepared by Seaborg is available at http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3hc273cb?display=all

  • C.C. Kelly (ed.), Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.C. Kelly (ed.), The Manhattan Project: The Birth of the Atomic Bomb in the Words of Its Creators, Eyewitnesses, and Historians (Black Dog & Leventhal Press, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.C. Kelly, R.S. Norris, A Guide to the Manhattan Project in Manhattan (Atomic Heritage Foundation, Washington, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.B. Kistiakowsky, Trinity—a reminiscence. Bull. At. Sci. 36(6), 19–22 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Lamont, Day of Trinity (Antheneum, New York, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.L. Laurence, Drama of the Atomic Bomb Found Climax in July 16 Test, The New York Times, Sept. 26, 1945, p. 1 and 16

    Google Scholar 

  • L.M. Libby, The Uranium People (Crane Russak, New York, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Lippincott, A Conversation with Robert F. Christy—Part I. Phys. Perspect. 8(3), 282–317 (2006); A Conversation with Robert F. Christy—Part II. Phys. Perspect. 8(4), 408–450 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era 1943–1945. Los Alamos Historical Society, Los Alamos (2002) http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/ManhattanProject/la_index.shtml

  • R.E. Malenfant, Experiments with the Dragon Machine. Los Alamos publication LA-14241-H (2005); http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/876514-I1Txj9/

  • D. McCullough, Truman (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Merlan, Life at Trinity Base Camp (Human Systems Research, Las Cruces, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Muller, Physics and Technology for Future Presidents: The Science Behind the Headlines (Norton, New York, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Neuenschwander, Jumbo: silent partner in the Trinity test. Radiations. Fall, 12–14 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Nichols, The Road to Trinity (Morrow, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Norris, Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie R. Groves, the Manhattan Project’s Indispensable Man (Steerforth Press, South Royalton, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Oppenheimer, Physics in the contemporary world. Bull. At. Sci. 4(3), 65–68 and 85–86 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Pais, R. P. Crease, J. Robert Oppenheimer: A Life (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Polmar, The Enola Gay: The B-29 That dropped The Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima (Brassey’s Inc, Dulles, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • I.I. Rabi, Science: the Center of Culture (World Publishing, New York, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Ramsey, August 1945: the B-29 flight logs. Bull. At. Sci. 38(10), 33–35 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ramsey, History of Project A: http://www.alternatewars.com/WW2/WW2_Documents/War_Department/MED/History_of_Project_A.htm

  • F. Reines, Yield of the Hiroshima Bomb. Los Alamos report LA-1398 (1952); http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/la-1398.pdf

  • B.C. Reed, Seeing the light: visibility of the July 1945 Trinity atomic bomb test from the inner solar system. Phys. Teach. 44(9), 604–606 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, A brief primer on tamped fission-bomb cores. Am. J. Phys. 77(8), 730–733 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, Predetonation probability of a fission-bomb core. Am. J. Phys. 78(8), 804–808 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, Fission fizzles: estimating the yield of a predetonated nuclear weapon. Am. J. Phys. 79(7), 769–773 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, The Physics of the Manhattan Project, 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, Chernobyl and Trinity—Counting the Curies. Fed. Am. Sci. Public Interest Rep. 69(2) 12–15 (2016). https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/PIR-2016_v3.1_small.pdf

  • B.C. Reed, An examination of the potential fission-bomb weaponizability of nuclides other than 235U and 239Pu. Am. J. Phys. 85(1), 38–44 (2017a)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Reed, Revisiting the Los Alamos Primer. Phys. Today 70(9), 42–49 (2017b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ruane, Churchill and the Bomb in War and Cold War (Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Russ, Project Alberta: The Preparation of Atomic Bombs for use in World War II (Exceptional Books, Los Alamos, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sartori, Effects of nuclear weapons. Phys. Today 36(3), 32–41 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Segrè, Enrico Fermi, Physicist (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Seidel, Los Alamos and the development of the Atomic Bomb (Otowi Crossing Press, Los Alamos, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.M. Semkow, P.P. Parekh, D.K. Haines, Modeling the effects of the trinity test, in Applied Modeling and Computations in Nuclear Science. American Chemical Society Symposium Series, vol. 945, pp. 142–159 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Serber, The Los Alamos Primer: The First Lectures on How To Build An Atomic Bomb (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Serber, R.P. Crease, Peace and War: Reminiscences of a Life on the Frontiers of Science (Columbia University Press, New York, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.S. Smith, Some recollections of metallurgy at Los Alamos, 1943–45. J. Nucl. Mater. 100(1–3), 3–10 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • H.D. Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940–1945 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1945)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • H. Soodak, M.R. Fleishman, I. Pullman N. Tralli, Reactor Handbook, Volume III Part A: Physics (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Stoff, J.F. Fanton, R.H. Williams, R.H., The Manhattan Project: A Documentary Introduction to the Atomic Age (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Sublette, Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions: http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq8.html

  • F.M. Szasz, The Day the Sun Rose Twice (University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Szasz, British Scientists and the Manhattan Project: The Los Alamos Years (Palgrave McMillan, London, 1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Taschek, J.H. Williams, Measurements on σf(49)/ σf (25) and the value of σf(49) as a function of neutron energy. Los Alamos report LA-28, 4 Oct. 1943. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/la-pubs/00414515.pdf

  • L.C. Thomas, Polonium in the Playhouse: the Manhattan Project’s Secret Chemistry Work in Dayton, Ohio (Trillium, Columbus, OH, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Truslow, R.C. Smith, Manhattan District History: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1973). Available online at https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs1/00103804.pdf

  • S.M. Ulam, Adventures of a Mathematician (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United States National Academy of Sciences, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 (Washington, DC, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Warren, The role of radiology in the development of the atomic bomb, in Radiology in World War II: Clinical Series, ed. by K.D.A. Allen (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Weintraub, The Last Great Victory: The End of World War II July/August 1945 (Dutton, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • V.F. Weisskopf, The Los Alamos Years. Phys. Today 20(10), 39–42 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Williams, Measurements of ν49/ν25. Los Alamos report LA-25, 21 Sept. 1943. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/la-pubs/00349613.pdf

  • M.M.R. Williams, The development of nuclear reactor theory in the Montreal Laboratory of the National Research Council of Canada (Division of Atomic Energy) 1943–1946. Prog. Nucl. Energy 36(3), 239–322 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Wilson, All in Our Time: The Reminiscences of Twelve Nuclear Pioneers (Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Chicago, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

Websites and Web-based Documents

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Cameron Reed .

Exercises

Exercises

  1. 7.1

    Consider a gun-type bomb with a solid cylindrical projectile piece of radius r and mass m which is fired under breech pressure P toward a mating target piece a distance x away. For simplicity, assume that the pressure P maintains its value as the projectile piece moves along the gun barrel. Using simple force and kinematic concepts [F = ma; v2 = 2ax], develop an expression for the velocity that the projectile will have after traveling down the barrel. Apply your result to a projectile with r = 3 inches, P = 75,000 lb per square inch, m = 50 kg, and x = 17 feet. Be careful with conversion factors; 1 inch = 2.54 cm; 1 lb per square inch = 6895 Pa. Does you result accord approximately with the figures given in this chapter? [Ans: 1398 m/s]

  2. 7.2

    Working from the parameter values cited in Table 7.1, verify the critical masses for U-235 and Pu-239 given in the Table; convince yourself that you understand how to solve the criticality equation (7.6). Now consider U-233: A = 233.04 gr/mol, ρ = 18.55 gr/cm3, σf = 1.946 bn, σel = 4.447 bn, v = 2.755 neutrons per fission. What is the critical mass? [Ans: 14.2 kg]

  3. 7.3

    From the decay-rate formula and spontaneous fission data of Sect. 7.7, compute the expected number of spontaneous fissions from 20 μg of Pu-239 over the course of 30 days. Does your result agree with the value of ~0.36 cited in the text?

  4. 7.4

    Suppose you have one gram of plutonium that is 99.99% Pu-239 by weight, with the remaining 0.01% being Pu-240 . Compute the hourly spontaneous fission rate of your gram of plutonium. [Ans: 199]

  5. 7.5

    It is remarked in the text that the shock-wave pressure created by a nuclear explosion is proportional to E2/3/d2, where E is the energy liberated by the explosion and d is distance. If it had been predicted that the Trinity test would liberate energy equivalent to 20,000 tons of TNT, how many tons of TNT should have been used in the May, 1945, calibration test to produce the same pressure at ground zero if the Trinity and test shots were at elevations of 100 and 28 feet, respectively? [Ans: 439 tons]

  6. 7.6

    From the dimensions given in Fig. 7.20, compute the masses of the aluminum and natural uranium tamper spheres in the Fat Man bomb; neglect the effect of the “trap-door” access. Take the densities of aluminum and natural uranium to be 2.699 and 18.95 gr/cm3, respectively. [Ans: aluminum 131 kg = 289 lb; uranium 101 kg = 223 lb]

  7. 7.7

    In the study of thermodynamic properties of materials, the following simple differential equation is used to model the change in volume dV of a sample of material of volume V when it is subjected to a change in pressure dP:

    $$\frac{dV}{dP} = - \frac{V}{B}.$$

    B is the bulk modulus of the material, a measure of its compressibility; a material of higher-B is more difficult to compress than one of lower B. The bulk modulus of plutonium is about 30 GPa (assume constant). If an implosion bomb subjects a plutonium core to a pressure increase of one million atmospheres (1 atm ~ 105 Pa), integrate the differential equation to estimate the ratio of the final volume of the plutonium to its initial volume. [Ans: Vfinal /Vinitial ~ 0.036]

  8. 7.8

    To minimize fallout created by an air-burst nuclear weapon, the weapon should be detonated at a height such that the fireball, at its maximum size, does not touch the ground. An approximate expression for the maximum radius in miles of the fireball created by an air-burst weapon of yield Y kilotons is R ~ 0.041Y 0.4. If a 200-kiloton weapon is detonated at this height, to what distance from ground zero will the maximum overpressure exceed 5 psi? Use (7.19) for the maximum overpressure . [Ans: 2.48 miles]

  9. 7.9

    The purpose of this problem is to make a very crude estimate of the radioactivity produced by a fission weapon. Suppose that fission of 235U happens exclusively by the reaction

    $${}_{92}^{235} {\text{U}} + {}_{0}^{1} {\text{n}} \to {}_{56}^{141} {\text{Ba}} + {}_{36}^{92} {\text{Kr}} + 3\left( {{}_{0}^{1} {\text{n}}} \right)$$

    Assume that 1 kg of 235U is fissioned in this way. 141Ba and 92Kr then both subsequently decay by beta-decay with half-lives of 18 min and 1.8 s, respectively. Use the decay-rate expression of this chapter to estimate the “immediate” beta-radioactivity so generated; for simplicity, ignore the neutrons released in the reaction. If this radioactivity falls out over an area of 10 square miles, what will be the resulting immediate radioactivity in Curies per square meter? [Ans: Appx. 2.7 × 1013 Ci; 1.0 × 106 Ci/m2]

  10. 7.10

    Due to a reactor accident, it is predicted that a city of population 200,000 will be exposed to radiation doses averaging 3 rems per person. You are the civic official responsible for deciding whether or not to evacuate the city. The Chief of Police tells you that the chaos to be expected in an evacuation will probably result in about 300 deaths due to traffic accidents, heart attacks, and other such causes. Compare the number of expected radiation-induced excess cancer deaths to the number of deaths expected to be caused by the evacuation. What would you do? [Ans: Appx. 240 excess deaths ]

  11. 7.11

    A typical household smoke detector contains an amount of 241Am corresponding to a radioactivity of 1 μCi (Sect. 2.1.2). To what mass does this correspond? How many detectors would you have to collect to give one critical mass, estimated to be ~60 kg? [Ans: About 0.29 μg; ~200 billion detectors]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reed, B.C. (2019). Los Alamos, Trinity, and Tinian. In: The History and Science of the Manhattan Project. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58175-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58175-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58175-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics