Skip to main content

Minimalinvasive mikrochirurgische Bandscheibenoperation lumbal mit tubulären Retraktoren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimalinvasive Wirbelsäulenintervention
  • 2179 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Zur Operation von lumbalen Bandscheibenvorfällen stellte die Laminektomie viele Jahre den Standardzugang dar. Da dabei für die Statik der Wirbelsäule wichtige Strukturen wie Wirbelbogen, Dornfortsatz und interspinöse Ligamente und somit die hintere Zuggurtung der Wirbelsäule entfernt wurden, kam es bei 2–10 % der Fälle zu iatrogenen Instabilitäten. Die Einführung der Teilhemilaminektomie an Stelle der Laminektomie führte zu einer deutlichen Reduktion des Zugangstraumas. Durch diese Zugangstechnik und den systematischen Erhalt der wesentlichen Anteile der Facettengelenke wurden keine iatrogenen Instabilitäten nach lumbalen Diskektomien mehr beobachtet. Die Einführung der Mikrochirurgie in die Wirbelsäulenchirurgie ging mit einer Verkleinerung des paraspinösen OP-Zugangs einher und führte neben kleineren Hautschnitten zu einer Reduktion des Muskeltraumas der paravertebralen Muskulatur und damit des Zugangstraumas. In den letzten Jahren sind zunehmend minimalinvasive Zugangsverfahren für Wirbelsäulenoperationen eingeführt worden, die zu einer weiteren Reduktion des Zugangstraumas führten. Für die minimalinvasive tubuläre Mikrodiskektomie werden tubuläre Retraktoren, deren Durchmesser typischerweise bei 14–18 mm liegt und die in Längen zwischen 3 und 9 cm in Stufen von 1 cm verfügbar sind, verwendet. Die Besonderheit des minimalinvasiven tubulären Zugangs besteht in der Präparationstechnik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Agnelli G (2004) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. Circulation 110(24):4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn Y, Lee S-H, Park W-M, Lee H-Y, Shin S-W, Kang H-Y (2004) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(16):E326–E332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell WO, Lavyne MH (1984) Retractor for lumbar microdiscectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 14(1):69–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benifla M, Elamed IM, Arrelly RB (2008) Unilateral partial hemilaminectomy for disc removal in a 1-year-old child. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2(1):133–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cammisa FPJ, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(20):2663–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole JS 4th, Jackson TR (2007) Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Neurosurgery 61(3):539–544; discussion 544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):7–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley KT, Smith MM, Rampersaud YR (1999) Microendoscopic approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 7(5):e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(15):S26–S35

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H, Allam Y et al (2009) Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 18(7):992–1000

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Glocker F et al (2018) Lumbale Radikulopathie. S2k-Leitlinie, AWMF online, Registernummer 030/058, S 1–38. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/030-058l_S2k_Lumbale_Radikulopathie_2018-04.pdf. Zugegriffen am 07.08.2018

  • Hassler W, Kalkweg K, Brandner S, Slansky I (1996) Microsurgical management of lateral lumbar disc herniations: combined lateral and interlaminar approach. Acta Neurochir 138(8):901–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, Miklitz B (2008) Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(9):973–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbe U, Franco-Jimenez P, Klingler J-H, Vasilikos I, Scholz C, Kogias E (2016) Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine 24(1):48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs RE, Podichetty V, Fessler RG (2003) Microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent disc herniations. Neurosurg Focus 15(3):E11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karikari IO, Isaacs RE (2010) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26S):294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MH, Rihn J, Steele G, Davis R, Donaldson WF 3rd, Kang JD et al (2006) Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a review of 3,183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(22):2609–2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CW, Siemionow K, Anderson DG, Phillips FM (2011) The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(6):582–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kogias E, Klingler J-H, Franco Jimenez P, Vasilikos I, Sircar R, Scholz C et al (2017) Incidental durotomy in open versus tubular revision microdiscectomy: a retrospective controlled study on incidence, management, and outcome. Clin Spine Surg 30(10):E1333–E1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le H, Sandhu FA, Fessler RG (2003) Clinical outcomes after minimal-access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 15(3):E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CK (1983) Lumbar spinal instability (olisthesis) after extensive posterior spinal decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(4):429–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M (2010) Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 19(2):181–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE, Rice-Wyllie L, Wellington R, Smith MM et al (2002) Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S129–S236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruban D, O’Toole JE (2011) Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G (2006) A New full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49(2):80–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2009) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study comparing full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(2):122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senker W, Meznik C, Avian A, Berghold A (2013) The frequency of accidental dural tears in minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74(6):373–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El Shazly AA, El Wardany MA, Morsi AM (2013) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective comparative study of three surgical management procedures. Asian J Neurosurg 8(3):139–146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkin HA, Hash CJ (1979) Spondylolisthesis after multiple bilateral laminectomies and facetectomies for lumbar spondylosis. Follow-up review. J Neurosurg 50(1):45–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JS, Ogden AT, Shafizadeh S, Fessler RG (2010) Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(1):30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tafazal SI, Sell PJ (2005) Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management. Eur Spine J 14(3):287–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Than KD, Wang AC, Etame AB, La Marca F, Park P (2008) Postoperative management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51(5):263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD (1998) Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. Management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(12):1728–1732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yasargil MG, Pait TG (1996) Exposure versus instability. J Neurosurg 84:891–892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Hubbe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hubbe, U. (2019). Minimalinvasive mikrochirurgische Bandscheibenoperation lumbal mit tubulären Retraktoren. In: Jerosch, J. (eds) Minimalinvasive Wirbelsäulenintervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58094-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58094-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58093-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58094-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics