Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Power-to-Methanol: Techno-Economical and Ecological Insights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zukünftige Kraftstoffe

Part of the book series: ATZ/MTZ-Fachbuch ((ATZMTZ))

Abstract

Methanol synthesis based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H2) and recycled industrial carbon dioxide (CO2) represents an interesting solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. In this work the technological overview of the methanol synthesis from conventional feedstocks and based on CO2 is provided. The business case for this electricity based product under current market conditions (e.g. vs. conventional fossil methanol production cost) and the appropriate implementation scenarios to increase methanol attractiveness and adoption is highlighted. A complementary ecological evaluation of PtM process is provided and recommendations for this sustainable platform based on these understandings are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Annex I of the EU Directive 2003/87/EC underlines that “under the EU ETS rules for any other transfer” than in the case of long-term geological storage “of CO2 out of the installation, no subtraction of CO2 from the installation’s emissions is allowed”.

References

  1. Bertau M, Asinger F (2014) Methanol: the basic chemical and energy feedstock of the future Asinger’s vision today. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt WWP (ed) (2016) Power-to-liquids: potentials and perspectives for the future supply of renewable aviation fuel

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klankermayer J, Wesselbaum S, Beydoun K, Leitner W (2016) Angew Chem 55(26):7296 (International ed. in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Riaz A, Zahedi G, Klemeš JJ (2013) J Cleaner Prod 57:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergren M (2017) Methanol to energy – challenges and opportunities, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://news.ihsmarkit.com/press-release/country-industry-forecasting-media/global-methanol-demand-growth-driven-methanol-olefi

  7. http://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/IHS-ChemicalBulletin-Issue3-Alvarado-Jun16.pdf

  8. http://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Peter-Gross-Global-Methanol-Fuel-Blending-Initiatives-Panel.pdf

  9. Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Sehested J, Nørskov JK (2002) Adv Catal 47:65

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu YH, Ruckenstein E (2004) Adv Catal 48:297

    Google Scholar 

  11. Toporov D, Abraham R (2015) J South Afr Inst Min Metall 115(7):589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. http://dechema.de/Low_carbon_chemical_industry.html

  13. Goehna H, Koenig P (1994) ChemTech 24(6):36

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saito M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T, Toyir J, Luo S, Wu J (1997) Energy Convers Manag 38:403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pontzen F, Liebner W, Gronemann V, Rothaemel M, Ahlers B (2011) Catal Today 171(1):242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Centi G, Perathoner S (2009) Catal Today 148(3–4):191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Joo O-S, Jung K-D, Yonsoo J (2004) In Carbon dioxide utilization for global sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on carbon dioxide utilization. Elsevier, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doss B, Ramos C, Atkins S (2009) Energy Fuels 23(9):4647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ushikoshi K, Mori K, Kubota T, Watanabe T, Saito M (2000) Appl Organometal Chem 14(12):819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. https://www.thyssenkrupp-industrial-solutions.com/media/download_1/methanol_plants_eng.pdf

  21. Ladebeck J (1993) Hydrocarbon processing, (United States) 72(3)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saito M, Takeuchi M, Fujitani T, Toyir J, Luo S, Wu J, Mabuse H, Ushikoshi K, Mori K, Watanabe T (2000) Appl Organometal Chem 14(12):763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Fei J, Yu Y, Zheng X (2006) Energy Convers Manag 47(18–19):3360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schlögl R (2013) Chemical energy storage. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu G (1984) J Catal 90(1):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kung HH (1992) Catal Today 11(4):443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu J, Saito M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T (2001) Appl Catal A Gen 218(1–2):235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fichtl MB, Schlereth D, Jacobsen N, Kasatkin I, Schumann J, Behrens M, Schlögl R, Hinrichsen O (2015) Appl Catal A Gen 502:262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arakawa H, Dubois J-L, Sayama K (1992) Energy Convers Manag 33(5–8):521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JS, Lee KH, Lee SY, Kim YG (1993) J Catal 144(2):414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rahimpour MR (2008) Fuel Process Technol 89(5):556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goehna H, Koenig P (1994) Verfahren zur Erzeugung von Methanol(DE Patent 000004416425A1)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Joo O-S, Jung K-D, Moon I, Rozovskii AY, Lin GI, Han S-H, Uhm S-J (1999) Ind Eng Chem Res 38(5):1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Joo O-S (2000) In abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society, p 394

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ingolfsson O, Jonsson FR, Shulenberger A, Tran K-C (2007) Process for producing liquid fuel from carbon dioxide and water (WO Patent 002007108014A1)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nestler F, Krüger M, Full J, Hadrich MJ, White RJ, Schaadt A (2018) Chem Ing Tec 90(10):1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun JT, Metcalfe IS, Sahibzada M (1999) Ind Eng Chem Res 38(10):3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu J, Saito M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T (2001) Appl Catal A 218(1–2):235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klier K (1982) J Catal 74(2):343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chanchlani KG (1992) J Catal 136(1):59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nappi A, Fabbricino L, Hudgins RR, Silveston PL (1985) Can J Chem Eng 63(6):963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ostrovskii V (2002) Catal Today 77(3):141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rozovskii AY (2003) Top Catal 22(3/4):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Coteron A, Hayhurst AN (1994) Chem Eng Sci 49(2):209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chinchen GC, Denny PJ, Jennings JR, Spencer MS, Waugh KC (1988) Appl Catal 36:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Takagawa M (1987) J Catal 107(1):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ren Z-X, Wang J, Jia J-J, Lu D-S (1989) Appl Catal 49(1):83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McNeil MA, Schack CJ, Rinker RG (1989) Appl Catal 50(1):265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Denise B, Sneeden RPA, Hamon C (1982) J Mol Catal 17(2–3):359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kuechen C, Hoffmann U (1993) Chem Eng Sci 48(22):3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Behrens M (2015) Recyclable Catalysis 2(1):3343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sahibzada M, Metcalfe IS, Chadwick D (1998) J Catal 174(2):111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. J. Ladebeck, J. P. Wagner and T. Matsuhisa in Natural Gas Conversion IV, Elsevier, 1997, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saito M, Murata K (2004) Catal Surv Asia 8(4):285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lange J-P (2001) Catal Today 64(1–2):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Balthasar W, Müller D, Wagner U (2016) Verfahren zur Synthese von Methanol (EP Patent 000003205622A1)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bertau M (Hrsg) (2014) Methanol: the basic chemical and energy feedstock of the future: Asinger’s vision today. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  58. Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS (2009) Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Rostrup-Nielsen JR (2002) Catal Today 71(3–4):243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Dybkjær I, Christensen TS (2001) In natural gas conversion VI, p 435. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  61. Twigg MV (2003) Top Catal 22(3/4):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Liu X-M, Lu GQ, Yan Z-F, Beltramini J (2003) Ind Eng Chem Res 42(25):6518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Müller D, Ott J (2007) Verfahren und Anlage zur Herstellung von Methanol, Bei der Herstellung von Methanol aus einem Synthesegas wird das Kohlenstoffoxid und Wasserstoff enthaltende Synthesegas katalytisch zu Methanol umgesetzt und dann destillativ abgetrennt. Um den Gehalt an Trimethylamin (TMA) im Methanol zu reduzieren, wird das Methanol durch einen Ionenaustauscher geführt. (DE Patent 102007030440A1)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zurbel A, Kraft M, Kavurucu-Schubert S, Bertau M (2018) Chem Ing Tec 90(5):721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1324404/000119312516490022/d140313d425.htm

  66. Schittkowski J, Ruland H, Laudenschleger D, Girod K, Kähler K, Kaluza S, Muhler M, Schlögl R (2018) Chem Ing Tec 115(1–4):2

    Google Scholar 

  67. Alvarado M (2016) Global Methanol Outlook 2016: February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  68. Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS (2009) Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Weekman V, Floudas CA (2012) Comput Chem Eng 47:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. https://www.icis.com/subscriber/icb/2017/06/30/10119756/china-plans-wave-of-new-crackers/. Accessed Dec 2018

  71. European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) (2015) Methanol as a gasoline blending component. ACEA Position Paper

    Google Scholar 

  72. Methanol Institute. Methanol Use In Gasoline: Blending, Storage and Handling of Gasoline Containing Methanol, Methanol Blending Technical Product Bulletin, Singapore, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bragadeshwaran A, Kasianantham N, Ballusamy S, Tarun KR, Dharmaraj AP, Kaisan MU (2018) Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(33):33573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ouda M, Yarce G, White RJ, Hadrich MJ, Himmel D, Schaadt A, Klein H, Jacob E, Krossing I (2017) React Chem Eng 2(1):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ouda M, Mantei F, Hesterwerth K, Bargiacchi E, Klein H, White RJ (2018) React Chem Eng 129(37):11164

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ouda M, Mantei FK, Elmehlawy M, White RJ, Klein H, Fateen S-EK (2018) React Chem Eng 3(3):277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. International Maritime Organization (IMO) and DNV GL. Methanol as marine fuel: Environmental benefits, technology readiness, and economic feasibility: Use of methanol as fuel, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  78. http://n-azot.ru/UserFiles/bmag-tula_06_x_T%D0%99%C2%A6%C2%A6%C2%A6%C2%A6%C2%A6%C2%AC%C2%A6-%C2%A6-%C2%A6-%C2%A6%C2%AC%C2%A6-T%D0%92_EN.pdf

  79. https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/petrochemicals/091118-irans-marjan-ramps-up-operations-at-new-16-mil-mtyear-methanol-unit. Accessed Dec 2018

  80. https://www.icis.com/explore/resources/news/2018/04/20/10214163/largest-us-methanol-plant-closer-to-start-up-with-mechanical-completion/. Accessed Dec 2018

  81. https://dechema.de/Forschung/Forschungsf%C3%B6rderung/Projekte/Power+to+Methanol.html. Accessed Dec 2018

  82. https://bmbf.nawam-erwas.de/de/project/biomethanol. Accessed Dec 2018

  83. Streeck J, Hank C, Neuner M, Gil-Carrera L, Kokko M, Pauliuk S, Schaadt A, Kerzenmacher S, White RJ (2018) Green Chem 20(12):2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. http://carbonrecycling.is/george-olah/. Accessed Dec 2018

  85. http://bse-leipzig.de/BSE-Flyer-BASF-DB_web.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  86. https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/media/c2c/presse/27_06_16_kurzdarstellung.pdf. Accessed Nov 2017

  87. http://www.carbonrecycling.is/fresme-project. Accessed Dec 2018

  88. https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/tccs-9/presentasjoner/d5/7---20170614-fresme-h2020-project---dissemination.pdf

  89. Hank C, Gelpke S, Schnabl A, White RJ, Full J, Wiebe N, Smolinka T, Schaadt A, Henning H-M, Hebling C (2018) Sustain Energy Fuels 2(6):1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Assen Nvd, Muller LJ, Steingrube A, Voll P, Bardow A (2016) Environ Sci Technol 50(3):1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Fischedick M, Görner K (Hrsg) (2015) CO2: separation, storage, usage: holistic view in ther ange of energy economy and industry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  92. Keith DW, Ha-Duong M, Stolaroff JK (2005) Clim Change 74(1–3):17

    Google Scholar 

  93. Goehna H, Koenig P (1994) Chemtech (Chemical technoloy) 36

    Google Scholar 

  94. Pérez-Fortes M, Schöneberger JC, Boulamanti A, Tzimas E (2016) Appl Energy 161:718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Rihko-Struckmann LK, Peschel A, Hanke-Rauschenbach R, Sundmacher K (2010) Ind Eng Chem Res 49(21):11073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Stefansson B (2015) Power and CO2 emissions to methanol, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kost C, Mayer J, Thomsen J, Hartmann N, Senkpiel C, Philipps S, Nold S, Lude S, Schlegl T (2013) Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  98. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie BMWi (2014) Gesetz für den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien: Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – EEG 2014

    Google Scholar 

  99. Baerns M (2013) Technische Chemie. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  100. Machhammer O, Bode A, Hormuth W (2015) Chem Ing Tec 87(4):409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Atsonios K, Panopoulos KD, Kakaras E (2016) Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(4):2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Matzen M, Alhajji M, Demirel Y (2015) Energy 93:343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Schlögl R (2016) Top Catal 59(8–9):772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. In EUR-Lex, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  105. SCOT Project ed (2015) EU ETS to incentivise CO2 Utilisation

    Google Scholar 

  106. SETIS (2016) Carbon capture utilisation and storage, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  107. Duncan I (ed) (2016) Draft Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, European Parliament

    Google Scholar 

  108. Altenschmidt S (2017) Recognition of climate protection measures: success at ECJ for the Lime Industry with Luther

    Google Scholar 

  109. Fischedick M, Görner K (Hrsg) (2015) CO2: Abtrennung, Speicherung, Nutzung: Ganzheitliche Bewertung im Bereich von Energiewirtschaft und Industrie. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hendriks , Graus W (2004) Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  111. Humphreys KK (2004) Project and cost engineers handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  112. Smolinka T, Günther M, Garche J (2011) Stand und Entwicklungspotenzial der Wasserelektrolyse zur Herstellung von Wasserstoff aus regenerativen Energien: NOW-Studie

    Google Scholar 

  113. vad Mathiesen B, Ridjan I, Connolly D, Nielsen MP, Hendriksen PV, Mogensen MB, Jensen SH, Ebbesen SD (2013) Technology data for high temperature solid oxide electrolyser cells, alkali and PEM electrolysers

    Google Scholar 

  114. Smolinka T (2015) Cost break down and analysis of PEM electrolysis systems for different industrial and Power to Gas applications, Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  115. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Ludwig-Bölkow Systemtechnik, Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE and KBB Underground Technologies, Studie über die Planung einer Demonstrationsanlage zur Wasserstoff-Kraftstoffgewinnung durch Elektrolyse mit Zwischenspeicherung in Salzkavernen unter Druck, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  116. Aicher T, Gonzalez MI, Götz M (2014) Energie Wasser Praxis -DVGW Jahresrevue

    Google Scholar 

  117. Humphreys KK (2005) Project and cost engineers’ handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  118. ADI Analytics LLC (2015) Natural Gas Utilization via Small-Scale Methanol Technologies, Commissioned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners’ Shale Gas Innovation & Commercialization Center, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  119. Smolinka T, Wiebe N, Philip S, Palzer A, Lehner F, Jansen M, Kiemel S, Robert M, Wahren S, Zimmermann F (2018) Studie IndWEDe: Industrialisierung der Wasserelektrolyse in Deutschland: Chancen und Herausforderungen für nachhaltigen Wasserstoff für Verkehr, Strom und Wärme, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  120. Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking – FCH JU (2017) Study on early business cases for H2 in energy and more broadly power to H2 applications. Final Report, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schmidt O, Gambhir A, Staffell I, Hawkes A, Nelson J, Few S (2017) Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(52):30470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Saba SM, Müller M, Robinius M, Stolten D (2018) Int J Hydrogen Energy 43(3):1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Mignard D, Sahibzada M (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  124. Mignard D (2003) Int J Hydrogen Energy 28(4):455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. ADI Analytics LLC (2015) Natural gas utilization via small-scale methanol technologies

    Google Scholar 

  126. Goehna H, Koenig P (1994) ChemTech 1994(24/6):36

    Google Scholar 

  127. Ladebeck J, Wagner JP, Matsuhisa T (1997) Stud Surf Sci Catal 1997(107):73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. https://www.methanex.com/sites/default/files/methanol-price/MxAvgPrice_Aug%2031%2C%202018.pdf

  129. https://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/de/Forschungsfelder/Energie-Rohstoffe/Fraunhofer-ISE_Transformation-Energiesystem-Deutschland_final_19_11%20(1).pdf. Accessed Apr 2017

  130. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-03/solar-developers-undercut-coal-with-another-record-set-in-dubai. Accessed Dec 2016

  131. http://fortune.com/2016/09/19/world-record-solar-price-abu-dhabi/. Accessed Dec 2016

  132. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-19/solar-sells-in-chile-for-cheapest-ever-at-half-the-price-of-coal. Accessed Dec 2016

  133. Gerhard N, Sandau F, Zimmermann B, Papen C, Bofinger S, Hoffmann C (2014) Geschäftsmodell Energiewende: Eine Antwort auf das “Die-Kosten-der-Energiewende”-Argument, Kassel

    Google Scholar 

  134. Palzer A, Henning H-M (2014) Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014(30):1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. ecoinvent (2016) Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230

    Google Scholar 

  136. Kuckshinrichs W, Markewitz P, Linssen J, Zapp P, Peters M, Köhler B, Müller TE, Leitner W (2010) Weltweite Innovationen bei der Entwicklung von CCS-Technologien und Möglichkeiten der Nutzung und des Recyclings von CO2

    Google Scholar 

  137. Hugill JA, Overbeek JP, Spoelstra S (2001) A comparison of the eco-efficiency of two production routes for methanol

    Google Scholar 

  138. DIN EN ISO 14040

    Google Scholar 

  139. DIN, DIN EN ISO 14044: Umweltmanagement – Ökobilanz – Anforderungen und Anleitungen (ISO 14044:2006); Deutsche und Englische Fassung EN ISO 14044:2006, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  140. http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/system-models-in-ecoinvent-3/system-models-in-ecoinvent-3.html. Accessed Jan 2017

  141. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2010). Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – General guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed guidance. First edition, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  142. Zimmermann A, Johannes W, Buchner G, Muller LJ, Armstrong K, Michailos S, Marxen A, Naims H, Zimmerman A, Wunderlich J, Buchner G, Müller L, Mason F, Stokes G, Williams E (2018) Techno-economic assessment & life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2 utilization, global CO2 initiative. University of Michigan, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  143. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-19/solar-sells-in-chile-for-cheapest-ever-at-half-the-price-of-coal. Accessed Mar 2018

  144. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-03/solar-developers-undercut-coal-with-another-record-set-in-dubai. Accessed Mar 2018

  145. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/power/chile-breaks-dubais-record-of-solar-power-output-at-low-cost/articleshow/53932595.cms. Accessed Mar 2018

  146. http://fortune.com/2016/09/19/world-record-solar-price-abu-dhabi/. Accessed Mar 2018

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Matthias Krüger from thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG is gratefully acknowledged for his contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thermochemical Processes Department, Hydrogen Technologies Division, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Heidenhofstr. 2, 79110, Freiburg, Germany

    Mohamed Ouda, Christoph Hank, Florian Nestler, Max Hadrich, Johannes Full, Achim Schaadt & Christopher Hebling

Authors
  1. Mohamed Ouda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Hank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florian Nestler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Max Hadrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johannes Full
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Achim Schaadt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christopher Hebling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohamed Ouda or Christoph Hank .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany

    Wolfgang Maus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ouda, M. et al. (2019). Power-to-Methanol: Techno-Economical and Ecological Insights. In: Maus, W. (eds) Zukünftige Kraftstoffe. ATZ/MTZ-Fachbuch. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58006-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58006-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58005-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58006-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation