Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physikalisch-medizinisches Assessment in der Onkologischen Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Onkologische Rehabilitation

  • 2076 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel soll einen kurzen Überblick über ausgewählte physikalisch-medizinische Assessment-Methoden in der Rehabilitation von Patientinnen und Patienten mit onkologischen Erkrankungen geben. Dabei sind unterschiedliche Defizite bei onkologischen Patientinnen und Patienten zu berücksichtigen, die durch die Erkrankung sowie deren Behandlung möglicherweise verursacht werden. Diese sind z. B. Einschränkungen der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität, Schmerz, Fatigue und Einschränkungen der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit.

Grundpfeiler des physikalisch-medizinisches Assessments in der Onkologischen Rehabilitation stellen primär die Anamnese und körperliche Untersuchung dar. Diese können durch Anwendung von Skalen und Fragebögen und Tests zur Erfassung der motorischen Grundeigenschaften zwecks genauerer Evaluierung mit dem Ziel der Erstellung eines individuell angepassten Rehabilitationsplans gut ergänzt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AM, Abernethy AP, Atkinson A et al (2010) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Cancer-related fatigue. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(8):904–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower JE (2014) Cancer-related fatigue – mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(10):597–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AW, Chai T, Smith LS (2014) Cancer pain assessment. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8(2):112–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crevenna R (2015) Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care – two important parts of comprehensive cancer care. Support Care Cancer 23(12):3407–3408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crevenna R (2017) Kompendium Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation. Diagnostische und therapeutische Konzepte. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crevenna R (2018) Evaluation of cancer rehabilitation in Austria. Wien Med Wochenschr 168(13–14):331–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crevenna R, Maehr B, Fialka-Moser V, Keilani M (2009) Strength of skeletal muscle and quality of life in patients suffering from „typical male“ carcinomas. Support Care Cancer 17(10):1325–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hacke W (2015) Neurologie. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenoehrl T, Keilani M, Sedghi Komanadj T et al (2015) The effects of resistance exercise on physical performance and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 23(8):2479–2497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Lingen C, Buss U, Snaith RP (2011) Hospital anxiety and depression scale – Deutsche Version (HADS-D), 3., akt. u. neu norm. Aufl. Manual. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinman RS, Dobson F, Takla A, O’Donnell J, Bennell KL (2014) Which is the most useful patient-reported outcome in femoroacetabular impingement? Test-retest reliability of six questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 48:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ICD (2017) Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme 10. Revision – BMGF-Version 2017. https://www.bmgf.gv.at/cms/home/attachments/1/1/2/CH1241/CMS1287572751172/icd-10_bmgf_2017_-_systematisches_verzeichnis_sp1_neu.pdf. Zugegriffen am 26.11.2018

  • ICF (2017) ICF – International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Zugegriffen am 26.11.2018

  • Janda V (2009) Manuelle Muskelfunktionsdiagnostik, 4. Aufl. Urban&Fischer, Elesvier, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerome A, Gross RT (1991) Pain disability index: construct and discriminant validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:920–922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones LW, Eves ND, Haykowsky M, Joy AA, Douglas PS (2008) Cardiorespiratory exercise testing in clinical oncology research: systematic review and practice recommendations. Lancet Oncol 9(8):757–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keilani M, Haig AJ, Crevenna R (2016) Practical assessment in patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders. Wien Med Wochenschr 166(1–2):5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall FP, Kendall McCreary E, Provance PG, McIntyre Rogers M, Romani WA (2001) Muskeln – Funktionen Und Tests, 5. Aufl. Urban & Fischer, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD (2004) Composition of the ESPEN Working Group. Bioelectrical impedance analysis – part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 23(5):1226–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai JS, Cella D, Chang CH, Bode RK, Heinemann AW (2003) Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Qual Life Res 12(5):485–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine GN, D’Amico AV, Berger P (2010) American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Cancer Society and the AUA Androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American Urological Association: endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. Circulation 121:833–840

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry DW, Tomiyama AJ (2015) Air displacement plethysmography versus dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in underweight, normal-weight, and overweight/obese individuals. PLoS One 10(1):e0115086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maehr B, Keilani M, Wiltschke C et al (2016) Cancer rehabilitation in Austria – aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wien Med Wochenschr 166(1–2):39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manna A, Sarkar SK, Khanra LK (2015) PA1 – an internal audit into the adequacy of pain assessment in a hospice setting. BMJ Support Palliat Care 5(Suppl 1):A19–A20

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes KL, Pestoni G, Korol D, Van Hemelrijck M, Rohrmann S (2018) The risk of prostate cancer mortality and cardiovascular mortality of nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Urol Oncol 36(6):309.e15–309.e23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS (1999) The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the brief fatigue inventory. Cancer 85(5):1186–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses-Echávez JF, González-Jiménez E, Ramírez-Vélez R (2015) Effects of supervised multimodal exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomed Res Int. Article ID: 328636

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishita S, Mitobe Y, Tsubaki A (2018) Differences in balance function between cancer survivors and healthy subjects: a pilot study. Integr Cancer Ther 17(4):1144–1149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Morris R, Deary V, Castell B (2013) Chronic fatigue syndrome. Handb Clin Neurol 110:303–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offenbächer M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G (2003) Validation of a German version of the ‚Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand‘ questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 62(2):168–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ et al (2018) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 27(11):28791–28703

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordan MA, Mazza C, Barbe C et al (2018) Feasibility of systematic handgrip strength testing in digestive cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: the FIGHTDIGO study. Cancer 124(7):1501–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pachman DR, Barton DL, Swetz KM et al (2012) Troublesome symptoms in cancer survivors: fatigue, insomnia, neuropathy, and pain. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3687–3696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA (2008) Muscle as an endocrine organ: focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol Rev 88(4):1379–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira JC, Neri SGR, Vainshelboim B et al (2018) Normative values of knee extensor isokinetic strength for older women and implications on physical function. J Geriatr Phys Ther. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000198. Epub ahead of print

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE (2013) Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-meter walk test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 36(1):24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfingsten M, Kröner-Herwig B, Leibing E, Kronshage U, Hildebrandt J (2000) Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Eur J Pain 4:259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rocourt MH, Radlinger L, Kalberer F et al (2008) Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roubenoff R, Kehayias JJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Heymsfield SB (1993) Use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a „gold standard“. Am J Clin Nutr 58(5):589–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp T, Butscheidt S, Jähn K et al (2018) Low physical performance determined by chair rising test muscle mechanography is associated with prevalent fragility fractures. Arch Osteoporos 13(1):71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers SP, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Brach JS, Fielding RA (2006) Concordance and discordance between two measures of lower extremity function: 400 meter self-paced walk and SPPB. Aging Clin Exp Res 18(2):100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jäger E, Banzer W (2013) Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. J Sports Med 34(7):631–636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C et al (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(7):1409–1426. Erratum in: Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Jan;43(1):195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz LO (1993) Methods of body composition analysis the status of the gold standard. Trends Endocrinol Metab 4(10):318–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seyidova-Khoshknabi D, Davis MP, Walsh D (2011) Review article: a systematic review of cancer-related fatigue measurement questionnaires. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 28(2):119–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silver JK, Baima J (2013) Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92(8):715–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silver JK, Smith SR, Wisotzky EM, Raj VS, Fu JB, Kirch RA (2015) Response to editorial by Richard Crevenna, MD, regarding „cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology services“ by Silver et al. Support Care Cancer 23(12):3409–3410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, Fejer R, Beck R (2011) Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R 3(5):472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomann KD, Schröter F, Grosser V (2008) Orthopädisch-unfallchirurgische Begutachtung – Praxis der klinischen Begutachtung. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L (1990) Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol 45(6):239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trutschnigg B, Kilgour RD, Reinglas J (2008) Precision and reliability of strength (Jamar vs. Biodex handgrip) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vs. bioimpedance analysis) measurements in advanced cancer patients. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33(6):1232–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood LJ, Nail LM, Winters KA (2009) Does muscle-derived interleukin-6 mediate some of the beneficial effects of exercise on cancer treatment-related fatigue? Oncol Nurs Forum 36(5):519–524

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E (1997) Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage 13(2):63–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zanini A, Aiello M, Cherubino F (2015) The one repetition maximum test and the sit-to-stand test in the assessment of a specific pulmonary rehabilitation program on peripheral muscle strength in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 10:2423–2430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitation und Arbeitsmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich

    Mohammad Keilani & Timothy Hasenöhrl

Authors
  1. Mohammad Keilani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy Hasenöhrl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Keilani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitation und Arbeitsmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Richard Crevenna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keilani, M., Hasenöhrl, T. (2020). Physikalisch-medizinisches Assessment in der Onkologischen Rehabilitation. In: Crevenna, R. (eds) Onkologische Rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57982-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57982-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57981-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57982-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation