Zusammenfassung
Die Erkennung der Viabilität der menschlichen Metaphase-II-Oozyten ist in der Literatur des letzten Jahrzehnts ein kontrovers diskutiertes Thema. Die Entwicklung der Oozyten während der follikulären Maturation ist entscheidend für ihre Fähigkeit, eine normale Fertilisation sowie die folgenden embryonalen Entwicklungsschritte zu durchlaufen. Die komplette physiologische Reifung der Eizelle erfordert konzertiert ablaufende nukleäre und zytoplasmatische Prozesse, um optimale zelluläre Bedingungen herzustellen. Abweichungen von diesen optimalen Prozessen führen zu Eizellen, deren Qualitätseinschränkungen sich in verschiedenen Dysmorphien ausdrücken und im weiteren Verlauf dann unter Umständen nicht zu der gewünschten Implantation führen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Alikani M, Palermo G, Adler A et al (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in dysmorphic human oocytes. Zygote 3:283–288
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology (2011) Istanbul consensus workshops on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 22:632–646
Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ et al (2007) Milder ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 22:980–988
Balaban B, Urman B (2006) Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 12:608–615
Balaban B, Urman B, Setac A et al (1998) Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3431–3433
Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mervan R, Mumcu A, Nuhoglu A (2001a) The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum Reprod 16:2357–2361
Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A et al (2001b) The effect of polar body (PB) morphology on embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 76:S11
Balakier H, Bouman D, Sojecki et al (2002) Morphological and cytoplasmic analysis of human giant ooctes and giant embryos. Hum Reprod 17:2394–2401
Borini A, Lagalla C, Cattoli M et al (2005) Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. Reprod Biomed Online 10:653–658
Brewis IA (1999) Proteomics in reproductive research: The potential importance of proteomics to research in reproduction. Hum Reprod 14:2927–2929
Choi T, Fukasawa K, Zhou R et al (1996) The Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway regulates the size and degradation of the first polar body in maturing mouse oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:7032–7035
Ciotti PM, Notarangelo L, Morselli-Labate AM et al (2004) First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 19:2334–2339
Ciray HN, Karagenc L, Ulug U et al (2005) Use of both early cleavage and day 2 mononucleation to predict embryos with high implantation potential in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 84:1411–1416
De Cassia R, Figueira MS, Braga DPAF et al (2010) Metaphase II human oocyte morphology: contributing factors and effects on fertilization potential and embryo developmental ability in ICSI cycles. Fertil Steril 94:1115–1117
De Santis L, Cino I, Rabelloti E et al (2005) Polar body morphology and spindle imaging as predictors of oocyte quality. Reprod Biomed Online 11:36–42
De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C et al (1996) Oocytes morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11:595–597
Devreker F (2005) Uptake and release of glucose, pyruvate and lactate, non-invasive embryo quality assessment. Eshre Campus:77–91
Ebner T, Moser M, Yaman C et al (1999) Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72:599–603
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J et al (2000) Blastocysts score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73:1155–1158
Giovanni C, Elena S, Lucia S et al (2004) What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034:132–144
Hamamah S (2005) Oocyte and embryo quality: is their morphology a good criterion? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 34:5S38–5S41
Hassan-Ali H, Hisham-Saleh A, El-Gezeriry D et al (1998) Perivitelline space granularity: a sign of human menopausal gonadotrophin overdose in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3425–3430
Kere J, Hofmann B (2011) Comprehensive molecular analysis of oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod 26(Suppl 1):i56
Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE, Ingerslev HJ (2012) Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod 27(5):1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des079
Klein NA, Battaglia DE, Fujimoto VY, Davis GS, Bremner WJ, Soules MR (1996) Reproductive aging: accelerated ovarian follicular development associated with a monotropic follicle-stimulating hormone rise in normal older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 81:1038–1045
Ludwig M, Schopper B, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K (2000) Clincial use of pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmatic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the condition of the German embryo protection law. Hum Reprod 15:325–329
Mikkelsen A, Lindenberg S (2001) Morphology of in vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 16:1714–1718
Montag M, Van der Ven H (2001) Evaluation of pronuclear morphology as the only selection criterion for further embryo culture and transfer: results of a prospective multicentre study. Hum Repaired 16:2384–2389
Montag M, Köster K, van der Ven K, Van der Ven H (2009) Qualität der Eizelle. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 6(Sonderheft 1):26–28
Ng EH, Lau EY, Yeung WS et al (2001) hMG is as good as recombinant human FSH in terms of oocyte and embryo quality: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 16:319–325
Niakan KK, Han J, Pedersen RA, Simon C, Reijo Pera RA (2012) Human pre-implantation embryo development. Development 139:829–841
Palermo G, Alikani M, Bertoli M et al (1996) Oolemma characteristics in relation to survival and fertilization patterns of oocyte treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11:172–176
Papanikolaou EG, Kolbianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venedig CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P (2008) Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 23:91–99
Pena JE, Chang PL, Chan LK et al (2002) Supraphsiological estradiol levels do not effect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles. Hum Reprod 17:83–87
Rashidi BH, Sarvi F, Tehrani ES et al (2005) The effect of hMG and recombinant human FSH on oocyte quality: a randomized single-blind clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120:190–194
Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Lacbelli M et al (2008) Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril 90:1692–1700
Ritter-Eichenlaub U, Schmiady H, Kentenich H et al (1995) Recurrent failure in polar body formation and premature chromosome condensation in oocytes from human patient: indicatore ofasynchrony in nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. Hum Reprod 10:2343–2349
Scott LA, Smith S (1998) The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum Report 13:1000–1013
Shen Y, Stalf T, Mehnert C et al (2006) Light retardnace by human oocyte spindle is positively related to pronuclear score after ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 12:737–751
Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG (1992) The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring tecnique to select optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 7:117–119
Tesarik J, Greco E (1999) The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod 14:1318–1323
Trotnow S, Kniewald T, Al-Hasani S, Becker H (1981) Follikelpunktion, In vitro Fertilisation, Embryotransfer und eingetretene Schwangerschaften in Dyneric/HMG-stimulierten Zyklen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 41:829–898
Verlinsky Y, Lerner S, Illkevitch N et al (2003) Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential. Reprod Biomed Online 7:336–341
Xia P (1997) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 12:1750–1755
Yakin K, Balaban B, Isiklar A (2007) Oocyte dysmorphism is not associated with aneuploidy in the developing embryo. Fertil Steril 88:811–816
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Hasani, S., Diedrich, K. (2020). Bewertung der Qualität menschlicher Oozyten und Embryonen. In: Diedrich, K., Ludwig, M., Griesinger, G. (eds) Reproduktionsmedizin. Springer Reference Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57636-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57636-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57635-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57636-6
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)