Advertisement

An Open Source Tool for Creating Model Files for Virtual Volume Rendering in PDF Documents

  • Axel Newe
  • Julian Brandner
  • Wolfgang Aichinger
  • Linda Becker
Conference paper
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Zusammenfassung

Volume rendering is an important technique for medical imaging where many modalities produce three-dimensional (3D) images. An appropriate three-dimensional rendering leads to a better perception of the image content. A major problem is exchangeability: Usually, only two-dimensional, static snapshots of a volume-rendered scene can be distributed electronically. The Portable Document Format (PDF) provides the possibility to embed 3D objects. With suitable reading software, these objects can be displayed interactively. This article presents an open-source implementation of a software tool that is based on the MeVisLab imaging framework and that can convert volume images into model files which can be embedded into PDF files to create a virtual volume rendering.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    St John M, Cowen M, Smallman HS, et al. The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Hum Factors. 2001;43(1):79–98.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teyseyre A, Campo M. An overview of 3D software visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2009;15(1):87–105.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakata H, Tsutsui K, Taira M. Toward an understanding of the neural processing for 3D shape perception. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):151–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowman DA, Chen J, Wingrave CA, et al. New directions in 3D user interfaces. Int J Virtual Real. 2006;5(2):3–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newe A, Becker L, Schenk A. Application and evaluation of interactive 3D PDF for presenting and sharing planning results for liver surgery in clinical routine. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115697.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, et al. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2012;22(9):865–70.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, et al. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 1984;26(1):1454–60.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Society for Testing and Materials. Portable Document Format-Healthcare (PDF) A Best Practices Guide. [Online]. 2008 [Cited 2017 Oct 30].. Available from: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?AIIMASTM.
  9. 9.
    Ruthensteiner B, Baeumler N, Barnes DG. Interactive 3D volume rendering in biomedical publications. Micron. 2010;41(7):886.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ECMA International. Standard ECMA-363, universal 3D file format, 4th edition (June 2007). [Online]. [Cited 2017 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-363%204th%20Edition.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Newe A. Enriching scientific publications with interactive 3D PDF: an integrated toolbox for creating ready-to-publish figures. Peer J Comput Sci. 2016;2(3):e64.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The meVisLab community. meVisLab community modules. [Online]. [Cited 2017 Oct 30]. Available from: https://github.com/MeVisLab/communitymodules.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Newe
    • 1
  • Julian Brandner
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Aichinger
    • 2
  • Linda Becker
    • 3
  1. 1.Chair of Medical InformaticsFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenDeutschland
  2. 2.Method Park Engineering GmbHErlangenDeutschland
  3. 3.Chair of Health PsychologyFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations