Quantitative Process Analysis

  • Marlon Dumas
  • Marcello La Rosa
  • Jan Mendling
  • Hajo A. Reijers


Qualitative analysis is a valuable tool to gain systematic insights into a process. However, the results obtained from qualitative analysis are sometimes not detailed enough to provide a solid basis for decision making. To understand the impact of issues, we need to go beyond qualitative analysis. This chapter introduces techniques for analyzing business processes quantitatively in terms of process performance measures such as cycle time, waiting time, cost, and resource utilization. The chapter focuses on three techniques: flow analysis, queueing analysis, and simulation. The chapter shows how these techniques can be used to measure the cycle time and capacity of a process, to detect critical paths and bottlenecks, and to estimate the performance impact of a given process change.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    I. Adan, J. Resing, Queueing Theory (Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2002)Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    R. Anupindi, S. Chopra, S.D. Deshmukh, J.A. van Mieghem, E. Zemel, Managing Business Process Flows (Prentice Hall, New York, 1999)Google Scholar
  3. 21.
    J.D. Blackburn, Time-based competition: White-collar activities. Bus. Horiz. 35(4), 96–101 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 28.
    S. Conger, Six sigma and business process management, in Handbook of Business Process Management 1, ed. by J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 127–146Google Scholar
  5. 58.
    A. Greasley, A redesign of a road traffic accident reporting system using business process simulation. Bus. Process Manag. J. 10(6), 635–644 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 75.
    W.D. Kelton, R.P. Sadowski, N.B. Swets, Simulation with Arena, 5th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 85.
    M. Laguna, J. Marklund, Business Process Modeling, Simulation and Design (Prentice Hall, New York, 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 104.
    N. Martin, B. Depaire, A. Caris, The use of process mining in business process simulation model construction - structuring the field. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(1), 73–87 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 105.
    N. Martin, M. Swennen, B. Depaire, M. Jans, A. Caris, K. Vanhoof, Retrieving batch organisation of work insights from event logs. Decis. Support Syst. 100, 119–128 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 177.
    W.M.P. van der Aalst, Business process simulation survival guide, in Handbook of Business Process Management 1, ed. by J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 337–370Google Scholar
  11. 178.
    W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Rosemann, M. Dumas, Deadline-based escalation in process-aware information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 492–511 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 196.
    Y. Yang, M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, A. Polyvyanyy, L. Zhang, Generalized aggregate quality of service computation for composite services. J. Syst. Softw. 85(8), 1818–1830 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlon Dumas
    • 1
  • Marcello La Rosa
    • 2
  • Jan Mendling
    • 3
  • Hajo A. Reijers
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.School of Computing and Information SystemsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Information BusinessVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  4. 4.Department of Computer SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations