Qualitative Process Analysis

  • Marlon Dumas
  • Marcello La Rosa
  • Jan Mendling
  • Hajo A. Reijers
Chapter

Abstract

Analyzing business processes is both an art and a science. In this respect, qualitative analysis is the artistic side of process analysis. Qualitative process analysis techniques allow us to identify, classify, and understand weaknesses and improvement opportunities in a process. In this chapter, we introduce a selected set of principles and techniques for qualitative process analysis. First, we present two techniques to identify unnecessary steps of the process (value-added analysis) and sources of waste (waste analysis). Next, we present techniques to identify and document issues in a process from multiple perspectives and to analyze the root causes of these issues.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 15.
    G. Barnett, Robotic process automation: Adding to the process transformation toolkit. White paper IT0022-0005, Ovum Consulting, 2015Google Scholar
  2. 28.
    S. Conger, Six sigma and business process management, in Handbook of Business Process Management 1, ed. by J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 127–146Google Scholar
  3. 56.
    E.M. Goldratt, The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (North River Press, Great Barrington, 1992)Google Scholar
  4. 61.
    M. Hammer, What is business process management, in Handbook of Business Process Management 1, ed. by M. Rosemann, J. vom Brocke (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 3–16Google Scholar
  5. 72.
    F. Johannsen, S. Leist, G. Zellner, Implementing six sigma for improving business processes at an automotive bank, in Handbook of Business Process Management 1, ed. by J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 393–416Google Scholar
  6. 85.
    M. Laguna, J. Marklund, Business Process Modeling, Simulation and Design (Prentice Hall, New York, 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 115.
    N. Modig, P. Ahlström, This Is Lean: Resolving the Efficiency Paradox (Rheologica, Stockholm, 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 140.
    S.-H. Rhee, N.W. Cho, H. Bae, Increasing the efficiency of business processes using a theory of constraints. Inf. Syst. Front. 12(4), 443–455 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 142.
    J.J. Rooney, L.N. Vanden Heuvel, Root cause analysis for beginners. Qual. Prog., 45–53 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 159.
    A. Schwegmann, M. Laske, As-is modeling and process analysis, in Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, ed. by J. Becker, M. Kugeler, M. Rosemann (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 170.
    D. Straker, A Toolbook for Quality Improvement and Problem Solving (Prentice Hall, New York, 1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlon Dumas
    • 1
  • Marcello La Rosa
    • 2
  • Jan Mendling
    • 3
  • Hajo A. Reijers
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.School of Computing and Information SystemsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Information BusinessVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  4. 4.Department of Computer SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations