Abstract
Various methods can be used to create a process model from information inferred within the organization, e.g., by interviewing process participants or by observing how these operate in practice. Meanwhile, it is important to ensure that a model is not only syntactically correct, but that it also accurately reflects the actual business process being modeled. In this chapter, we first present the challenges faced by the stakeholders involved in the lead-up to a process model. Then, we discuss methods to facilitate effective communication and information gathering about business processes. We then show step-by-step how to construct a process model based on the gathered information, and what quality criteria should be checked before the model can be accepted as an authoritative representation of a business process.
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei (1564–1642)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.M.P. van der Aalst, Verification of Workflow Nets, in Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, ed. by P. Azéma, G. Balbo. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1248 (Springer, Berlin, 1997), pp. 407–426
J. Becker, M. Rosemann, C. von Uthmann, Guidelines of Business Process Modeling, in Business Process Management. Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, ed. by W.M.P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, A. Oberweis (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 30–49
B.L. Berg, H. Lune, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Pearson, Boston, 2004)
J.G. Clark, D.B. Walz, J.L. Wynekoop, Identifying exceptional application software developers: A comparison of students and professionals. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(1), 8 (2003)
D. Cohn, R. Hull, Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 32(3), 3–9 (2009)
J. Dick, E. Hull, K. Jackson, Requirements Engineering, 4th edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2017)
J.M. Digman, Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41(1), 417–440 (1990)
M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, R. Mäesalu, H.A. Reijers, N. Semenenko, Understanding business process models: the costs and benefits of structuredness, in International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 31–46
P.J.M. Frederiks, T.P. van der Weide, Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 4–20 (2006)
J. Jeston, J. Nelis, Business Process Management: Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations, 3rd edn. (Routledge, New York, 2014)
J. Krogstie, Quality in Business Process Modeling (Springer, Berlin, 2016)
H. Leopold, R.-H. Eid-Sabbagh, J. Mendling, L.G. Azevedo, F.A. Baião, Detection of naming convention violations in process models for different languages. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 310–325 (2013)
O.I. Lindland, G. Sindre, A. Sølvberg, Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
J. Mendling, Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 6 (Springer, Berlin, 2008)
J. Mendling, Empirical studies in process model verification, in Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II, Special Issue on Concurrency in Process-Aware Information Systems, vol. 5460 (2009), 208–224
J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(2), 127–136 (2010)
J. Mendling, L. Sánchez-González, F. García, M. La Rosa, Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models. J. Syst. Softw. 85(5), 1188–1197 (2012)
J. Mendling, M. Strembeck, J. Recker, Factors of process model comprehension - findings from a series of experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 53(1), 195–206 (2012)
A. Ottensooser, A. Fekete, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, C. Menictas, Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. J. Syst. Softw. 85(3), 596–606 (2012)
M. Petre, Why looking isn’t always seeing: Readership skills and graphical programming. Commun. ACM 38(6), 33–44 (1995)
K. Pohl, Requirements Engineering: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques (Springer, Berlin, 2010)
G. Redding, M. Dumas, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, A. Iordachescu, A flexible, object-centric approach for business process modelling. SOCA 4(3), 191–201 (2010)
H.A. Reijers, T. Freytag, J. Mendling, A. Eckleder, Syntax highlighting in business process models. Decis. Support Syst. 51(3), 339–349 (2011)
H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 41(3), 449–462 (2011)
M. La Rosa, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, P. Wohed, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Managing process model complexity via concrete syntax modifications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7(2), 255–265 (2011)
M. La Rosa, P. Wohed, J. Mendling, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Managing process model complexity via abstract syntax modifications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7(4), 614–629 (2011)
M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part a. Bus. Process Manag. J. 12(2), 249–254 (2006)
M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part b. Bus. Process Manag. J. 12(3), 377–384 (2006)
M. Rosemann, A. Hjalmarsson, M. Lind, J. Recker, Four facets of a process modeling facilitator, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (Association for Information Systems, 2011)
K.D. Schenk, N.P. Vitalari, K.S. Davis, Differences between novice and expert systems analysts: What do we know and what do we do? J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 9–50 (1998)
I. Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (Teachers College Press, New York, 2006)
A. Sharp, P. McDermott, Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Applications Development, 2nd edn. (Artech House, Norwood, 2008)
J. Stirna, A. Persson, K. Sandkuhl, Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations, in Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2007), ed. by J. Krogstie, A.L. Opdahl, G. Sindre. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4495, Trondheim, Norway, 2007 (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 546–560
A. van Lamsweerde, Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications (Wiley, New York, 2009)
L. Verner, The challenge of process discovery. BPTrends (May 2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A. (2018). Process Discovery. In: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56508-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56509-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)