Skip to main content

Process Discovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Various methods can be used to create a process model from information inferred within the organization, e.g., by interviewing process participants or by observing how these operate in practice. Meanwhile, it is important to ensure that a model is not only syntactically correct, but that it also accurately reflects the actual business process being modeled. In this chapter, we first present the challenges faced by the stakeholders involved in the lead-up to a process model. Then, we discuss methods to facilitate effective communication and information gathering about business processes. We then show step-by-step how to construct a process model based on the gathered information, and what quality criteria should be checked before the model can be accepted as an authoritative representation of a business process.

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.

Galileo Galilei (1564–1642)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W.M.P. van der Aalst, Verification of Workflow Nets, in Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, ed. by P. Azéma, G. Balbo. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1248 (Springer, Berlin, 1997), pp. 407–426

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Becker, M. Rosemann, C. von Uthmann, Guidelines of Business Process Modeling, in Business Process Management. Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, ed. by W.M.P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, A. Oberweis (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 30–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.L. Berg, H. Lune, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Pearson, Boston, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.G. Clark, D.B. Walz, J.L. Wynekoop, Identifying exceptional application software developers: A comparison of students and professionals. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(1), 8 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Cohn, R. Hull, Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 32(3), 3–9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Dick, E. Hull, K. Jackson, Requirements Engineering, 4th edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Digman, Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41(1), 417–440 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, R. Mäesalu, H.A. Reijers, N. Semenenko, Understanding business process models: the costs and benefits of structuredness, in International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.J.M. Frederiks, T.P. van der Weide, Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 4–20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Jeston, J. Nelis, Business Process Management: Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations, 3rd edn. (Routledge, New York, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Krogstie, Quality in Business Process Modeling (Springer, Berlin, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Leopold, R.-H. Eid-Sabbagh, J. Mendling, L.G. Azevedo, F.A. Baião, Detection of naming convention violations in process models for different languages. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 310–325 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. O.I. Lindland, G. Sindre, A. Sølvberg, Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Mendling, Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 6 (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Mendling, Empirical studies in process model verification, in Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II, Special Issue on Concurrency in Process-Aware Information Systems, vol. 5460 (2009), 208–224

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(2), 127–136 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Mendling, L. Sánchez-González, F. García, M. La Rosa, Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models. J. Syst. Softw. 85(5), 1188–1197 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Mendling, M. Strembeck, J. Recker, Factors of process model comprehension - findings from a series of experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 53(1), 195–206 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ottensooser, A. Fekete, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, C. Menictas, Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. J. Syst. Softw. 85(3), 596–606 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Petre, Why looking isn’t always seeing: Readership skills and graphical programming. Commun. ACM 38(6), 33–44 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Pohl, Requirements Engineering: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Redding, M. Dumas, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, A. Iordachescu, A flexible, object-centric approach for business process modelling. SOCA 4(3), 191–201 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. H.A. Reijers, T. Freytag, J. Mendling, A. Eckleder, Syntax highlighting in business process models. Decis. Support Syst. 51(3), 339–349 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 41(3), 449–462 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. La Rosa, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, P. Wohed, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Managing process model complexity via concrete syntax modifications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7(2), 255–265 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. La Rosa, P. Wohed, J. Mendling, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Managing process model complexity via abstract syntax modifications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7(4), 614–629 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part a. Bus. Process Manag. J. 12(2), 249–254 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part b. Bus. Process Manag. J. 12(3), 377–384 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Rosemann, A. Hjalmarsson, M. Lind, J. Recker, Four facets of a process modeling facilitator, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (Association for Information Systems, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. K.D. Schenk, N.P. Vitalari, K.S. Davis, Differences between novice and expert systems analysts: What do we know and what do we do? J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 9–50 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. I. Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (Teachers College Press, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Sharp, P. McDermott, Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Applications Development, 2nd edn. (Artech House, Norwood, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Stirna, A. Persson, K. Sandkuhl, Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations, in Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2007), ed. by J. Krogstie, A.L. Opdahl, G. Sindre. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4495, Trondheim, Norway, 2007 (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 546–560

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. van Lamsweerde, Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications (Wiley, New York, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Verner, The challenge of process discovery. BPTrends (May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A. (2018). Process Discovery. In: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56508-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56509-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics