Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Management of Failed Shoulder Surgery pp 103–109Cite as

Anatomical Shoulder Arthroplasty: How It Works

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 786 Accesses

Abstract

Survival of the anatomical shoulder arthroplasty depends on the implant and on the technique of implantation. The most common causes of failure of anatomical shoulder arthroplasty, regardless of design and surgical technique, are infection, allergy, instability, stiffness, rotator cuff tears, peri-prosthetic fractures, and glenoid erosions. Even if great effort is made to improve the design and quality of the materials of the prostheses, methods of implantation of a TSA remain of paramount importance. However, it should be reminded that prosthetic shoulder surgery is a soft tissue surgery. Surgical approach is important to restore the anatomy. Soft tissue balance is the key to success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fevang BT, Nystad TW, Skredderstuen A, Furnes ON, Havelin LI. Improved survival for anatomic total shoulder prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(1):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walch G, Boileau P, Noël E. Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77(6):501–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neer CS. The classic: articular replacement for the humeral head. 1955. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2409–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bigliani LU, Cofield RH, Flatow EL, Fukuda HA, Hawkins RJ, Matsen FA, Morrison DS, Rockwood CA Jr, Warren RF. Charles Neer: on the giant of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18(3):333–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(4):464–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Churchill RS, Kopjar B, Fehringer EV, Boorman RS, Matsen FA. Humeral component modularity may not be an important factor in the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005;34(4):173–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(5):857–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Favard L, Katz D, Colmar M, Benkalfate T, Thomazeau H, Emily S. Total shoulder arthroplasty – arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthropathies: results and complications after a minimum follow-up of 8 years according to the type of arthroplasty and etiology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(4 Suppl):S41–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidutz F, Agarwal Y, Müller PE, Gueorguiev B, Richards RG, Sprecher CM. Stress-shielding induced bone remodeling in cementless shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty: a finite element analysis and in vivo results. J Biomech. 2014;47(14):3509–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. Annual report. From: https://www.aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/en/annual-reports.

  11. Gregory T, Hansen U, Emery RJ, Augereau B, Amis AA. Developments in shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221(1):87–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levy O, Copeland SA. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004;13(3):266–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas SR, Wilson AJ, Chambler A, Harding I, Thomas M. Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(5):485–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammond G, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasty in functional glenohumeral positions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1):68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maier MW, Lauer S, Klotz MC, Bülhoff M, Spranz D, Zeifang F. Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Routman HD, Becks L, Roche CP. Stemless and short stem humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2015;73(Suppl 1):S145–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berth A, Pap G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14(1):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M, Magosch P. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(9):1463–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loew M. Short stem shoulder prosthesis: concept and first results. Orthopade. 2013;42(7):501–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Teissier P, Teissier J, Kouyoumdjian P, Asencio G. The TESS reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions: clinical and radiographic results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(1):45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bell SN, Gschwend N. Clinical experience with total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder using the Neer prosthesis. Int Orthop. 1986;10(4):217–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsen FA, Warme WJ, Jackins SE. Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2088–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Affatato S, De Mattia JS, Bracco P, Pavoni E, Taddei P. Wear performance of neat and vitamin E blended highly cross-linked PE under severe conditions: the combined effect of accelerated ageing and third body particles during wear test. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;64:240–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA. Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(24):2205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boileau P, Moineau G, Morin-Salvo N, Avidor C, Godenèche A, Lévigne C, Baba M, Walch G. Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(10):1534–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lacroix D, Murphy LA, Prendergast PJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122(4):430–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Glennie RA, Giles JW, Johnson JA, Athwal GS, Faber KJ. An in vitro study comparing limited to full cementation of polyethylene glenoid components. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karelse A, Leuridan S, Van Tongel A, Debeer P, Van Der Sloten J, Denis K, De Wilde LF. Consequences of reaming with flat and convex reamers for bone volume and surface area of the glenoid; a basic science study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anglin C, Wyss UP, Nyffeler RW, Gerber C. Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16(2):144–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Grey SG. Use of a caged, bone ingrowth, glenoid implant in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty technique and early results. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;71(Suppl 2):S41–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11(4):331–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Boileau P, Mole D, Adeleine P. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(12):2186–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oosterom R, Rozing PM, Verdonschot N, Bersee HE. Effect of joint conformity on glenoid component fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2004;218(5):339–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre JFK, Libourne, France

    Thierry Joudet

  2. IOAPC, Paris, France

    Christophe Charousset

Authors
  1. Thierry Joudet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christophe Charousset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The Shoulder Friends Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Joudet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Milano

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Casa di Cura Villa Valeria, Rome, Italy

    Andrea Grasso

  3. Clínica del Pilar , Zaragoza, Spain

    Angel Calvo

  4. Orthopaedic/Upper Limb, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biała, Poland

    Roman Brzóska

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ESSKA

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Joudet, T., Charousset, C., The Shoulder Friends Group. (2018). Anatomical Shoulder Arthroplasty: How It Works. In: Milano, G., Grasso, A., Calvo, A., Brzóska, R. (eds) Management of Failed Shoulder Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56504-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56504-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56503-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56504-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation