Abstract
When Dwight D. Eisenhower became the 34th president of the United States, he was the first incumbent of the office that did not hold any political office within state government or within the US Congress, excluding military service, since Ulysses Grant. No president prior to or since has crafted and influenced energy policy to the degree of President Eisenhower. As the first officeholder without a past “congressional” career, he was viewed as pro-business and pro-military, and the expectations of his government were that nuclear energy would provide cheaper electricity. The challenges during his administration enabled him to adopt a more orthodox policy stance, and the nuclear energy policies did not proceed as anticipated or planned. The 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, is the only individual since Eisenhower without a prior congressional-type political career. Since he has a foundation in real estate business, like Eisenhower, he is perceived as “pro-business,” and it is pertinent to compare similar energy policies under the current administration. Although the current administration is only 100 days old, statements during the primaries, general election, and first 100 days in office and first proposed federal budget suggest that tax credits for electric vehicles and other tax assistance credits will be discontinued and that certain brackets of taxes will be eliminated or greatly reduced. And many federal policies enacted under the Obama administration related to environment and energy will be rolled back, favoring coal, drilling, and Keystone XL and the Dakota Access Pipelines. Whether these policies will promote domestic energy production, reduce the import-to-export gap, or lower the “energy deficiency” is too early to gauge. The introduction of potential import fees or border taxes may promote coal extraction at the expense of natural gas exploration. This may also impact gasoline prices at the pump since crude oil imported from other countries would have taxes or fees levied on it. Coupled with limiting environmental regulations and capping liabilities, lower corporate tax rates for oil exploration companies may promote domestic energy production, because of lower operating costs and liabilities, and may increase corporate profits, although these trends may not be observable within the lifetime of the first term of President Trump. In addition, the projected 3% growth in employment over the current 1.7% is again too early to discern, although most economist’s opinions are that these targets will not be met since these currently are proposals and not implemented policy.
Author Contribution
The first draft of this chapter was written by SB. The data in the figures and charts were by SB and modified by JL. The first draft was reviewed and edited by NKS. All three authors collectively conceived and discussed the concept of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
IEO, US Department of Energy and International Energy Outlook 2009 and technical report DOE/EIA-0484 (2009), http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2013/ph241/roberts2/docs/WEO2009.pdf
M. Roser, Energy production & changing energy sources. I: empirical view (2010), https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-and-changing-energy-sources/
IEA, (2017), http://energyatlas.iea.org/#!/tellmap/-1002896040/0
EIA, (2016), http://www.eia.doe.gov/ieo/pdf/0484(2009).pdf
EIA, (2016), https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf
J.P. Tomain, The dominant model of United States energy policy. U. Colo. L. Rev. 61, 355–358 (1990)
AEO, (2017), https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
J.A. Hausman, Project independence report: an appraisal of US energy needs up to 1985. Bell J. Econ. 6, 517–551 (1975)
S. Shafiee, E. Topal, When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energ. Policy 37(1), 181–189 (2009)
EIA, (2017), https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/supply/weekly/
D.D. Eisenhower, Atoms for peace. IAEA Bull. 45(2), 62–67 (2003)
J. Chow, R.J. Kopp, P.R. Portney, Energy resources and global development. Science 302(5650), 1528–1531 (2003)
R.G. Hewlett, J.M. Holl, Atoms for Peace and War, 1953–1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission, vol. 3 (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1989), http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/1989-Hewlett-Holl-AtomsforPeaceandWar.pdf
A. Chandra, E. Thompson, Does public infrastructure affect economic activity?: evidence from the rural interstate highway system. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 30(4), 457–490 (2000)
C.E. Phelps, R.T. Smith, Petroleum Regulation: The False Dilemma of Decontrol (vol. 1951, No. RC) (Rand Corp, Santa Monica, 1977), https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2006/R1951.pdf
R.S. Pindyck, The optimal exploration and production of nonrenewable resources. J. Polit. Econ. 86(5), 841–861 (1978)
W.J. Mead, The performance of government in energy regulations. Am. Econ. Rev. 69(2), 352–356 (1979)
B. Hannon, R.A. Herendeen, P. Penner, Energy Conservation Tax: Impacts and Policy Implications (No. NP-2900771; ERG-267). (Illinois University Office of Vice Chancellor for Research, Urbana, 1979), https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/6075619
NSF, (2017), https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyfedfunds/#tabs-2
A.M. Weinberg, Nuclear energy: salvaging the atomic age. Wilson Q. 3(3), 88–112 (1979)
J.V. Kennedy, The sources and uses of US science funding. New Atlantis 36, 3–22 (2012)
V. Bush, As we may think. Atlantic Month. 176(1), 101–108 (1945)
G.T. Shen, Resource 2. Federal R&D funding: quick agency profiles (2017), http://www.proposalexponent.com/federalprofiles.html
G.F. Nemet, D.M. Kammen, US energy research and development: declining investment, increasing need, and the feasibility of expansion. Energ. Policy 35(1), 746–755 (2007)
A. Simons, C. Bauer, A life-cycle perspective on automotive fuel cells. Appl. Energy 157, 884–896 (2015)
N.S. Lewis, Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science 351(6271), AAD1920-4 (2016), http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6271/aad1920
R. Boswell, Is gas hydrate energy within reach? Science 325(5943), 957–958 (2009), http://science.sciencemag.org/content/325/5943/957
J.D. Figueroa, T. Fout, S. Plasynski, H. McIlvried, R.D. Srivastava, Advances in CO2 capture technology – the US Department of Energy’s Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2(1), 9–20 (2008)
H. Tabuchi, What’s at stake in Trump’s proposed E.P.A. cuts (2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/10/climate/trump-epa-budget-cuts.html?_r=0
D.C. Crawford, D.L. Porter, S.L. Hayes, Fuels for sodium-cooled fast reactors: US perspective. J. Nucl. Mater. 371(1), 202–231 (2007)
J. Worland, President Trump’s energy policy remains a work in progress (2017), http://time.com/4662244/donald-trump-energy-policy-unclear/
J.H. Gibbons, Report to the president on federal energy research and development for the challenges of the twenty-first century. President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Executive Office of the President of the United States of America (1997), https://science.energy.gov/~/media/bes/pdf/accomplishments/files/pcast_energy_r_d_nov1997.pdf
F.J. Sissine, Renewable energy R&D funding history: a comparison with funding for nuclear energy, fossil energy, and energy efficiency R&D. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress (2008), http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/RS22858.pdf
EIA, (2016), https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/?tbl=T01.01#/?f=A
S.H. Schurr, B.C. Netschert, Energy in the American economy, 1850–1975. Challenge 10(9), 41–44 (1960), http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40718553.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
O. Hohmeyer, The social costs of electricity-renewables versus fossil and nuclear energy. Int. J. Sol. Energy 11(3–4), 231–250 (1992)
D. Kearney, Energy information administration. Department of Energy, 92010(9), 1–15 (2010), https://www.stb.gov/STB/docs/RETAC/2010/March/EIA AEO 2010.pdf
P. Jaramillo, W.M. Griffin, H.S. Matthews, Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(17), 6290–6296 (2007)
R.S. Pindyck, The long-run evolution of energy prices. Energy J. 20(2), 1–27 (1999)
S.P. Brown, M.K. Yücel, What drives natural gas prices? Energy J. 29(2), 45–60 (2008)
E. Worrell, C. Galitsky, Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for petroleum refineries, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005), http://escholarship.org/uc/item/96m8d8gm
G.L. Kyriakopoulos, G. Arabatzis, Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 56, 1044–1067 (2016)
EIA, (2016), https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/data/browser/#/?id=2-AEO2017&cases=ref2017&sourcekey=0
M. Kovacevic, M. Lambic, L. Radovanovic, I. Kucora, M. Ristic, Measures for increasing consumption of natural gas. Energ. Source. B. Econ. Plann. Policy 12(5), 443–451 (2017)
M.Z. Jacobson, M.A. Delucchi, G. Bazouin, Z.A. Bauer, C.C. Heavey, E. Fisher, T.W. Yeskoo, 100% Clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energ. Environ. Sci. 8(7), 2093–2117 (2015)
V. Devabhaktuni, M. Alam, S.S.S.R. Depuru, R.C. Green, D. Nims, C. Near, Solar energy: trends and enabling technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 19, 555–564 (2013)
S.C. Mayotte, V. Rao, C.E. Lindhjem, M.S. Sklar, Reformulated gasoline effects on exhaust emissions: phase II: continued investigation of the effects of fuel oxygenate content, oxygenate type, volatility, sulfur, olefins and distillation parameters (no. 941974). SAE technical paper (1994), http://papers.sae.org/941974/
A.A. Keller, L.F. Fernandez, S. Hitz, H. Kun, A. Peterson, B. Smith, M. Yoshioka, An integral cost-benefit analysis of gasoline formulations meeting California phase II reformulated gasoline requirements. UC TSR&TP Report to the Governor of California (1998), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.15.9224&rep=rep1&type=pdf
F.E. Ahmed, Toxicology and human health effects following exposure to oxygenated or reformulated gasoline. Toxicol. Lett. 123(2), 89–113 (2001)
R.E. Morris, Y. Jia, The impact of biodiesel fuels on air quality and human health: task 4 report (2003), http://biodiesel.org/reports/20030501_gen-365.pdf
M. Strum, R. Scheffe, A national review of ambient air toxics observations. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 66(2), 120–133 (2016)
W.R. Hartley, A.J. Englande, D.J. Harrington, Health risk assessment of groundwater contaminated with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). Water Sci. Technol. 39(10–11), 305–310 (1999)
A.A. Meharg, in Ecological Impact of Major Industrial Chemical Accidents, ed. by G.W. Ware. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (Springer, New York, 1994), pp. 21–48
P. Brimblecombe, The clean air act after 50 years. Weather 61(11), 311–314 (2006)
T.R. Fanshawe, P.J. Diggle, S. Rushton, R. Sanderson, P.W.W. Lurz, S.V. Glinianaia, T. Pless-Mulloli, Modeling spatiotemporal variation in exposure to particulate matter: a two-stage approach. Environmetrics 19(6), 549–566 (2008)
S.M. Bernard, J.M. Samet, A. Grambsch, K.L. Ebi, I. Romieu, The potential impacts of climate variability and change on air pollution-related health effects in the United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 109(Suppl 2), 199–205 (2001)
K. Ito, G.D. Thurston, C. Hayes, M. Lippmann, Associations of London, England, daily mortality with particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and acidic aerosol pollution. Arch. Environ. Health 48(4), 213–220 (1993)
C. Ji, S. Wang, Combustion and emissions performance of a hybrid hydrogen–gasoline engine at idle and lean conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35(1), 346–355 (2010)
T. Johnson, Diesel engine emissions and their control. Platin. Met. Rev. 52(1), 23–37 (2008)
IEA, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2012 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2012), http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2012/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2012-edition
J. Conti, P. Holtberg, International energy outlook 2011. US energy information administration, (EIA) (2011), https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2011_WEB.pdf
Global Energy Statistical Yearbook, (2016), https://yearbook.enerdata.net/energy-consumption-data.html
M. Asif, T. Muneer, Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11(7), 1388–1413 (2007)
M.A. Delucchi, J.J. Murphy, US military expenditures to protect the use of Persian Gulf oil for motor vehicles. Energ. Policy 36(6), 2253–2264 (2008)
The Economist, The Trump administration’s trade strategy is dangerously outdated (2017), http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21717998-it-will-be-hard-deal-china-today-if-it-were-japan-1980s-trump
D.J. Hirschfeld, Trump sends NAFTA renegotiation notice to congress (2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/nafta-renegotiation-trump.html?_r=0
A. Heshmati, Demand, customer baseline and demand response in the electricity market: a survey. J. Econ. Surv. 28(5), 862–888 (2014)
IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2012) https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/ETP2012_free.pdf
E. Martinot, J. Sawin, Renewables global status report. Renewables 2012 Global Status Report, REN21 (2012), http://www.martinot.info/REN21_GSR2012.pdf
S. Ölz, Renewable energy policy considerations for deploying renewables (2011), http://environmentportal.in/files/file/Renew_Policies.pdf
L. Wu, S. Liu, D. Liu, Z. Fang, H. Xu, Modeling and forecasting CO2 emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable gray model. Energy 79, 489–495 (2015)
V. Bosetti, J. Frankel, Politically feasible emissions targets to attain 460 ppm CO2 concentrations. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 6(1), 86–109 (2012)
K.S. Lackner, A guide to CO2 sequestration. Science 300(5626), 1677–1678 (2003), http://science.sciencemag.org/content/300/5626/1677
F.T. Bacon, T.M. Fry, Review lecture: the development and practical application of fuel cells. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 334(1599), 427–452 (1973)
M. Warshay, P.R. Prokopius, The fuel cell in space: yesterday, today and tomorrow. J. Power Sources 29(1–2), 193–200 (1990)
K.V. Kordesch, 25 Years of fuel cell development/1951–1976. J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 77 (1978)
K.C. Tangri, U.S. Patent No. 4,085,709, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (1978), https://www.google.com/patents/US4085709
W. Surdoval, US DOE fossil energy fuel cell program. ECS Trans. 7(1), 11–15 (2007)
M.C. Williams, J.P. Strakey, W.A. Surdoval, The US Department of Energy, the office of fossil energy stationary fuel cell program. J. Power Sources 143(1), 191–196 (2005)
S. Gottesfeld, T.A. Zawodzinski, Polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Adv. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 5, 195–302 (1997)
D.E. Curtin, R.D. Lousenberg, T.J. Henry, P.C. Tangeman, M.E. Tisack, Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life. J. Power Sources 131(1), 41–48 (2004)
S. Gronich, 2010–2025 Scenario analysis (2010), https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f10/gronich_scenario_analysis.pdf
J. Rodriguez, P.X. Thivel, E. Puzenat, Photocatalytic hydrogen production for PEMFC supply: a new issue. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38(15), 6344–6348 (2013)
S. Satyapal, J. Petrovic, C. Read, G. Thomas, G. Ordaz, The US Department of Energy’s National Hydrogen Storage Project: progress towards meeting hydrogen-powered vehicle requirements. Catal. Today 120(3), 246–256 (2007)
J.J. Winebrake, B.P. Creswick, The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective-based scenario analysis using the analytic hierarchy process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 70(4), 359–384 (2003)
D. Garraín, Y. Lechón, C. de la Rúa, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) in automotive applications: environmental relevance of the manufacturing stage. Smart Grid Renew. Energy 2(2), 68–72 (2011)
B. Ibeh, C. Gardner, M. Ternan, Separation of hydrogen from a hydrogen/methane mixture using a PEM fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32(7), 908–914 (2007)
A. Emadi, K. Rajashekara, S.S. Williamson, S.M. Lukic, Topological overview of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicular power system architectures and configurations. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 54(3), 763–770 (2005)
S. Kawasaki, M. Ogura, T. Ono, Y. Kami, Development of the HONDA FCX fuel cell vehicle. Honda R&D Tech. Rev. 15(1), 1–6 (2003)
B.C. Steele, A. Heinzel, Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature 414(6861), 345–352 (2001), https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v414/n6861/full/414345a0.html
D. Chu, R. Jiang, Performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stacks: part I. Evaluation and simulation of an air-breathing PEMFC stack. J. Power Sources 83(1), 128–133 (1999)
L. Nguyen, F. Mighri, Y. Deyrail, S. Elkoun, Conductive materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cell bipolar plates made from PVDF, PET and co-continuous PVDF/PET filled with carbon additives. Fuel Cells 10(6), 938–948 (2010)
V. Mehta, J.S. Cooper, Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J. Power Sources 114(1), 32–53 (2003)
H. Zhang, P.K. Shen, The recent development of polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. Chem. Rev. 112(5), 2780–2832 (2012)
S. Zhang, X. Yuan, H. Wang, W. Mérida, H. Zhu, J. Shen, J. Zhang, A review of accelerated stress tests of MEA durability in PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34(1), 388–404 (2009)
J.P. Breen, J.R. Ross, Methanol reforming for fuel cell applications: development of zirconia-containing Cu–Zn–Al catalysts. Catal. Today 51(3), 521–533 (1999)
S. Velu, K. Suzuki, M. Okazaki, M.P. Kapoor, T. Osaki, F. Ohashi, Oxidative steam reforming of methanol over CuZnAl (Zr)-oxide catalysts for the selective production of hydrogen for fuel cells: catalyst characterization and performance evaluation. J. Catal. 194(2), 373–384 (2000)
S. Zhang, Y. Shao, G. Yin, Y. Lin, Recent progress in nanostructured electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(15), 4631–4641 (2013)
Y. Yuan, J.A. Smith, G. Goenaga, D.J. Liu, Z. Luo, J. Liu, Platinum-decorated aligned carbon nanotubes: electrocatalyst for improved performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 196(15), 6160–6167 (2011)
S. Shimpalee, U. Beuscher, J.W. Van Zee, Analysis of GDL flooding effects on PEMFC performance. Electrochim. Acta 52(24), 6748–6754 (2007)
K. Goto, I. Rozhanskii, Y. Yamakawa, T. Otsuki, Y. Naito, Development of aromatic polymer electrolyte membrane with high conductivity and durability for the fuel cell. Polym. J. 41(2), 95–102 (2009)
Honda R&D Technical Review provided by Honda Patents & Technologies North America, LLC.3, 1–10 (2009)
M. Matsunaga, T. Fukushima, K. Ojima, Powertrain system of Honda FCX Clarity fuel cell vehicle. World Electr. Veh. J. 3, 1–10 (2009)
B.D. James, A.B.. Spisak, Mass production cost estimation of direct H2 PEM fuel cell systems for transportation applications: 2012 update. Report by Strategic Analysis, Inc., under award number DEEE0005236 for the US Department of Energy, vol. 18 (2012), pp. 1–186, https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/11/f19/fcto_sa_2013_pemfc_transportation_cost_analysis.pdf
Y. Orbach, G.E. Fruchter, Forecasting sales and product evolution: the case of the hybrid/electric car. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78(7), 1210–1226 (2011)
B. Nykvist, M. Nilsson, Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5(4), 329–332 (2015)
J.B. Stronberg, Renewable Energy Tax Credits in the Age of Trump (Civil Notion, 2017). https://civilnotionblog.weebly.com/home/renewable-energy-tax-credits-in-the-age-of-trump
A. Walker, M. Galea, C. Gerada, A. Mebarki, D. Gerada. A topology selection consideration of electrical machines for traction applications: towards the FreedomCar 2020 targets. In Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), 2015 Tenth International Conference on IEEE (2015), pp. 1–10, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7112923/
Acknowledgments
The College of Arts and Sciences (CoA&S, Dr. Bashir, 160336-00002), American Chemical Society, Petroleum Research Funds (Dr. Liu, 53827-UR10), Summer Faculty Fellowship Program (Dr. Bashir), Welch Departmental Grant (AC-0006), and Department of Education (Dr. KingSanders, P031S150096 – I-CARE) at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) were duly acknowledged for their funding and student support. The Microscopy and Imaging Center (MIC) at TAMU and the Department of Chemistry at TAMUK were also duly acknowledged for their technical support and nanostructure characterization.
Dedication This chapter is dedicated to Professor Peter J. Derrick who passed away on February 6, 2017, during the preparation of this manuscript. Dr. Derrick was a Ph.D. advisor of SB at the University of Warwick. Dr. Derrick was someone who expected not only high academic rigor but also high ethical and professional standards. We deeply mourn the loss of this chemistry hero. We also celebrate his life and profession through the publication of peer-reviewed research.
SB also mourns the loss of his best friend Rakesh Prajapat with whom they shared their childhood until both were admitted by the universities. It seems incredible someone so young who is no longer present. SB deeply misses his loving company and excellent counsel, forever. SB would be delighted to pass his deepest condolences to Miss Sophie Prajapat, who will carry out her father’s legacy of being the utmost professional, a best friend, a reliable neighbor, and a decent person. SB is proud and privileged to call Mr. Rakesh Prajapat a “friend” in deed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to Peter J. Derrick and Rakesh Prajapat
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bashir, S., KingSanders, N., Liu, J.L. (2018). Fuel Cell Technology: Policy, Features, and Applications – A Mini-review. In: Li, F., Bashir, S., Liu, J. (eds) Nanostructured Materials for Next-Generation Energy Storage and Conversion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56364-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56364-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56363-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56364-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)