Skip to main content

Komplikationen der Hiatushernienchirurgie und deren Vermeidung

  • Chapter
  • 2014 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die am häufigsten auftretenden intraoperativen Komplikationen bei der Hiatushernienchirurgie stellen Blutungen, Kapseleinrisse der Leber und Milz, Perforationen des Ösophagus und/oder des Magens und Verletzungen der Pleura dar. Besonders große paraösophageale Hiatushernien Typ IV (Upside-down-Magen) sind vergesellschaftet mit intensiven intrathorakalen Verwachsungen mit dem Mediastinum und der Pleura und weisen ein hohes Risiko von Verletzungen der benachbarten Strukturen bei der Präparation auf. Die häufigsten frühpostoperativen Komplikationen stellen Pneumonien, thromboembolische Komplikationen und eine Herzinsuffizienz dar. Chirurgische Komplikationen wie Ösophagusperforationen oder Frührezidive sind sehr viel seltener. Postoperative Dysphagien können früh oder spät nach Hiatushernienoperationen auftreten. Im Fall einer frühen postoperativen Dysphagie kann zunächst abgewartet werden, ob es sich um eine Schwellung der Schleimhaut im Bereich des gastroösohagealen Übergangs handelt. Die Dysphagie stellt ein ernstes und relativ häufig beschriebenes spätpostoperatives Problem der Hiatushernienchirurgie dar. Die endoskopische Pneumodilatation führt in der Regel zu einer Verbesserung der dysphagischen Symptome. Eine Reoperation sollte den Fällen vorbehalten bleiben, bei denen eine konservative bzw. endoskopische Therapie nicht ausreichend wirksam ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagne DJ, Caushaj PF, Landreneau RJ, Keenan RJ (2004) Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc 18: 444–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrns KE, Schlinkert RT (1996) Laparoscopic management of paraesophageal hernia: early results. J Laparoendosc Surg 6: 311–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zoras O, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E (2002) Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication. A comparative study. Surg Endosc 16: 1679–1684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Congreve DP (1992) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg 2 (1): 45–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson LK (1992) Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia. Am J Surg 163 (4): 425–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Debray C, Poinsard G, Deporte A (1965) Gastric distension tachycardia syndrome, an occasionally severe complication of operated hiatal hernia. Actual Hepatogastroenterol (Paris) 1: 304–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez Tabernilla M, Ruiz-Tovar J, Grajal Marino R, Calero Garcia P, Pina Hernandez JD, Chames Vaisman A, Morales Castineiras V, Sanjuanbenito Dehesa A, Martinez Molina E, Fresneda Moreno V (2009) Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Open vs laparoscopic surgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101: 706–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman DS, Jacobs M, Lopez-Penalver C, Moses K (1998) Safe esophageal bougie placement for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. JSLS 2 (1): 31–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Edye MB, Canin-Endres J, Gattorno F, Salky BA (1998) Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Ann Surg 228: 528–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudric M, Sabate JM, Artru P, Chaussade S, Couturier D (1999) Results of pneumatic dilatation in patients with dysphagia after antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 86: 1088–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazebroek EJ, Leibman S, Smith GS (2009) Erosion of a composite PTFE/ePTFE mesh after hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19 (2): 175–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui JM, Hunt DR, de Carle DJ (2002) Esophageal pneumatic dilatation for postfundoplication dysphagia: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 972986–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal A, Kakarlapudi GV, Awad ZT, Haynatzki G, Turaga KK, Karu A, Fritz K, Haider M, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 10 (1): 12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jassim H, Seligman JT, Frelich M, Goldblatt M, Kastenmeier A, Wallace J, Zhao HS, Szabo A, Gould JC (2014) A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 28 (12): 3473–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jobe BA, Aye RW, Deveney CW, Domreis JS, Hill LD (2002) Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, Mittal SK, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, Fanelli RD (2013) SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27 (12): 4409–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lidor AO, Steele KE, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Marohn MR (2015) Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JAMA Surg 150 (5): 424–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Light D, Links D, Griffin M (2016) The threatened stomach: management of the acute gastric volvulus. Surg Endosc 30 (5): 1847–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low DE, Unger T (2005) Open repair of paraesophageal hernia: reassessment of subjective and objective outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 80: 287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Jobe BA, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ (2010) Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 (2): 395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattar SG, Bowers SP, Galloway KD, Hunter JG, Smith CD (2002) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 16 (5): 745–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal SK, Bikhchandani J, Gurney O, Yano F, Lee T (2011) Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years. Surg Endosc 25: 556–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA (2001) Paraesophageal hernias: open, laparoscopic, or thoracic repair? Chest Surg Clin N Am 11: 589–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Walenz T, McBride PJ, Smith SL, Katada N, Klingler PJ (1997) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Arch Surg 132: 586–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher DE, Curet MJ, Martin DT, Vogt DM, Mason J, Zucker KA (1995) Successful laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 130: 590–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM, Khaitan L, Rosen MJ, Onders RP, Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12 (11): 1888–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen M, Ponsky J (2003) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: an update for internists. Cleve Clin J Med 70: 511–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, Graham TO, Slivka A, Lee KK, Schraut WH, Luketich JD (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 176: 659–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Michael Brunt L, Hunter JG, Demeester TR, Swanstrom LL, Daniel Smith C, Filipi CJ (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23 (6): 1219–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber DM (2003) Laparoscopic surgery: an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138: 1083–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehetner J, Demeester SR, Ayazi S, Kilday P, Augustin F, Hagen JA, Lipham JC, Sohn HJ, Demeester TR (2011) Laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia: the second decade. J Am Coll Surg 212: 813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oor, J.E., Köckerling, F., Khullar, R., Hazebroek, E.J. (2018). Komplikationen der Hiatushernienchirurgie und deren Vermeidung. In: Bittner, R., Köckerling, F., Fitzgibbons, R.J., LeBlanc, K.A., Mittal, S., Chowbey, P. (eds) Laparo-endoskopische Hernienchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56090-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56090-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56090-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics