Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisationsentwicklung

  • Chapter
Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie für Bachelor

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Organisationen müssen ihre Anpassungs- und Lernfähigkeit stetig verbessern, wenn sie am Markt bestehen wollen. Organisationsentwicklungsmaßnahmen (OE-Maßnahmen) haben die besten Realisierungschancen und die höchste Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit, wenn Mitarbeitende zu Beteiligten gemacht, ihre Hoffnungen und Wünsche berücksichtigt und sie mit ihrer Expertise gehört werden. Der häufigste Grund für das Scheitern von OE-Maßnahmen wird in Widerständen von Mitarbeitenden gesehen. Distributive, prozedurale und interaktionale Gerechtigkeit bei Entscheidungs- und Kommunikationsprozessen kann Akzeptanz und Loyalität fördern. Eine transparente Kommunikation über Gründe, Inhalte und Folgen der Veränderungen, kann Widerständen vorbeugen oder sie reduzieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Ameln, F. von, Kramer, J., & Stark, H. (2009). Organisationsberatung beobachtet: Hidden Agendas und blinde Flecke. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G. & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46 (6), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, E. (2009). Beratung in der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. In P. Warschburger (Hrsg.), Beratungspsychologie (S.205–232). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. (2006). What is Organization Development? In J. V. Gallos (Hrsg.), Organization development. A Jossey-Bass reader (The Jossey-Bass business & management series, S. 3–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. & Harris, R. T. (1987). Organizational transitions. Managing complex change (2. Aufl.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem D., J (1967) Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review74 (3), 183–200.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernecker, T., & Reiss, M. (2003). Kommunikation im Wandel. Kommunikation als Instrument des Change Managements im Urteil von Change Agents. Zeitschrift Führung und Organisation, 71, 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biron, C. & Karanika-Murray, M. (2014). Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. International Journal of Stress Management, 21 (1), 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böning, U., & Fritschle, B. (2005). Coaching fürs Business. Bonn: managerSeminare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change. A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (6), 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushe, G. R. (2012). Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J. (Hrsg.), The Routledge Companion To Organizational Change (pp. 97–103). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management. A critical review. Journal of Change Management,(4), 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2 (1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L. & French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1 (4), 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L. & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Passmore (Hrsg.), Research in organizational change and development (S. 129–169). Stanford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, L. & Nahmias, A. H. (2010). Competencies for managing change. International Journal of Project Management, 28 (4), 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G. & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization development & change (10. Aufl.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2005). Transformational innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 33 (3), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. B. & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging »Resistance to Change«. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domsch, M. E., & Ladwig, D. H. (2006). Handbuch Mitarbeiterbefragung, 2. Aufl. Berlin, New York, Tokio, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18 (1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endrejat, P. (2017). Darstellung der unterschiedlichen Ansatzpunkte der Organisationsentwicklung beim Change Management. verfügbar unter https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501338.v1 als CC-BY4.0 Lizenz

  • Endrejat, P. C., Baumgarten, F. & Kauffeld, S. (2017). When theory meets practice. Combining Lewin’s ideas about change with motivational interviewing to increase energy-saving behaviours within organizations. Journal of Change Management, 22 (2), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endrejat, P. C. & Kauffeld, S. (2016). Über innovationsverhindernde und innovationsfördernde Denkweisen. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47 (3), 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endrejat, P. C. & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Wie könnten wir Organisationsentwicklungen partizipativ gestalten? Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 48 (2), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endrejat, P. C. & Kauffeld, S. (in press). From ›I should‹ to ›I want‹: Increasing the internalization of organizational members energy-saving motivation through participatory interventions. Umweltpsychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endrejat P. C, Klonek F. E. & Kauffeld S. (2015). A psychology perspective of energy consumption in organisations: The value of participatory interventions. Indoor and Built Environment24 (7), 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatzer, G. (Hrsg.) (2005).Gute Beratung von Organisationen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Beratungswissenschaft. Bergisch Gladbach: EHP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D. & Ford, L. W. (2009). Resistance to change: A reexamination and extension. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 17, 211–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W. & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freimuth, J., & Barth, T. (2011). 30 Jahre Organisationsentwicklung: Theorie und Praxis vs. Theorie oder Praxis? OrganisationsEntwicklung, 3, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W. (1969). Organization development Objectives, assumptions and strategies. California Management Review, 12 (2), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., Gerkhardt, M., & Fischer, P. (2008). Erfolgsfaktoren und Stolpersteine bei Veränderungen. In R. Fisch, A. Müller & D. Beck (Hrsg.), Veränderungen in Organisationen (S. 281–300). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2004). Innovation durch Teamarbeit: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2001). Setting the justice agenda: Seven unanswered questions about »what, why, and how«. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58 (2), 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, S. (2008). Coaching und ergebnisorientierte Selbstreflexion: Theorie, Forschung und Praxis des Einzel- und Gruppencoachings. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., Leon, N. de, George, G. & Thompson, P. (2015). Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58 (1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5), 929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N., & Fischer, I. (1997). Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, M. J., & Rowland, D. (2005). All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership. Change Management Journal, 5 (2), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, M. & López, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332 (6025), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, E., Kauffeld, S., & Frey, D. (2007). Psychologie der Beratung. In L. von Rosenstiel & D. Frey (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (S. 283–324). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 395–404.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2016). Nachhaltige Personalentwicklung und Weiterbildung (2., überarbeitete Auflage). Betriebliche Seminare und Trainings entwickeln, Erfolge messen, Transfer sichern. Berlin: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. & Ebner, K. (2014). Organisationsentwicklung. In H. Schuler & K. Moser (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (5., vollständig überarbeitete Auflage, S. 457–507). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2016). Nachhaltige Personalentwicklung und Weiterbildung. Betriebliche Seminare und Trainings entwickeln, Erfolge messen, Transfer sichern, (2., überarbeitete Auflage). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. & Ebner, K. (2014). Organisationsentwicklung. In H. Schuler & K. Moser (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (S. 457-507). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., Jonas, E., & Schneider, H. (2009). Strategisches Verhalten in der Berater-Klienten-Interaktion. In H. Möller & B. Hausinger (Hrsg.), Quo vadis Beratungswissenschaft? (S. 119–139). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. (1995). An academy classic. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9 (1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (2002). Organisationstheorien, 5. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleist, S., & Maetz, H. (2003). Widerstände im Change Management. In: G. Schewe (Hrsg.), Change-Management – Facetten und Instrumente (S. 53–58). Hamburg: Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonek, F. E., Isidor, R. & Kauffeld, S. (2014). Different Stages of entrepreneurship: Lessons from the transtheoretical model of change. Journal of Change Management, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonek, F .E. & Kauffeld, S. (2012). »Muss, kann … oder will ich was verändern?« Welche Chancen bietet die Motivierende Gesprächsführung in Organisationen. Wirtschaftspsychlogie,14(4), 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonek, F.E., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N.K., & Kauffeld, S. (2014). The dynamics of resistance to change: A sequential analysis of change agents in action. Journal of Change Management, 44(3), 334–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1979). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 57 (2), 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J., Ameln, F. v., & Stark, H. (2007). Hidden Agendas in Beratungs- und Veränderungsprozessen. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38 (3), 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, P. (2004). Next practice – erfolgreiches Management von Instabilität. Offenbach: Gabal Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. & Merry, U. (1986). Organizational transformation. Approaches, strategies, theories. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the ›field at a given time‹. Psychological Review, 50 (3), 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1 (1), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in group dynamics. II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1 (2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems. In Lewin, Gertrud, W. (Hrsg.), Resolving social conflicts. Selected papers on group dynamics (S. 201–220). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1963). Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created »social climates«. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (2), 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1947). Kurt Lewin. A pioneer in human relations research. Human Relations, 1 (1), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, R., Watson, J. & Westley, B. (1958). The dynamics of planned change. A comparative study of principles and techniques. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loebbert, M. (2015). The Art of Change: Von der Kunst, Veränderungen in Unternehmen und Organisationen zu führen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, B.A. & Izumi, H. (1993). Organizational change, design, and work innovation: A meta-analysis of 131 North American field studies – 1961–1991. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 7, 235–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill M, Gaume J, Apodaca T. R, Walthers J, Mastroleo N. R, Borsari B, et al. (2014). The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI’s key causal model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology82 (6), 973–983.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, F. C. (1957). Mann, F. C. (1957). Studying and creating change: A means to understanding social organization. Research in industrial human relations, 17, 146-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (2002). Kurt Lewin. Leben und Werk. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, R. J. (2005). Contemporary challenges to the philosophy and practice of organization development. In D. L. Bradford & W. W. Burke (Hrsg.), Reinventing organization development. New approaches to change in organizations (S. 19–42). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregror, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. Columbus: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, E. F. (2006). Business psychology and organisational behavior. A student’s handbook. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1982). Evolution and revolution: A quantum view of structural change in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19 (2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. (1983). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 11 (2), 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37( 2), 129–140.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: helping people change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Organisationsentwicklung. In F. W. Nerdinger, G. Blickle & N. Schaper (Hrsg.), Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 149–158). Berlin, New York, Tokio, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, G. A., Edwards, J. E. & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organizational development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42, 461-489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. & Abildgaard, J. S. (2013). Organizational interventions. A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work & Stress, 27 (3), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, S., Vakola, M. & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change. A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47 (4), 461–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 783–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. R. (1983). Enhancing the effectiveness of organizational change management. Human Resource Management, 22 (1–2), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy. Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19 (3), 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. M., Prochaska, J. O. & Levesque, D. A. (2001). A transtheoretical approach to changing organizations. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28 (4), 247–261.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5. Aufl.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5), 1141–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S. A. (2013). Coaching – das Aspirin für Changeprozesse? OrganisationsEntwicklung, 3, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1 (1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). Prozessberatung. In G. Fatzer (Hrsg.), Supervision und Beratung (S. 119–139). Bergisch Gladbach: EHP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2015). Dialogic organization development: Past, present, and future. In G. R. Bushe & R. J. Marshak (Hrsg.), Dialogic organization development. The theory and practice of transformational change (1. Aufl., S. vii–xiv). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. (2015). Liebesaffären zwischen Problem und Lösung. Hypnosystemisches Arbeiten in schwierigen Kontexten (6. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2010). The necessary revolution. How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiersmann, C., & Thiel, H.-U. (2010). Organisationsentwicklung: Prinzipien und Strategien von Veränderungsprozessen, 2. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., González-Romá, V., Ostroff, C. & West, M. A. (2017). Organizational climate and culture. Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (3), 468–482.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, A. (2002). Konfliktcoaching. Stuttgart: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, A. (2010). Ist Coaching reine Prozessberatung oder sind hier auch andere Beratungsmodelle relevant? Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 17, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Kurt Lewin – 1890–1947. Journal of Social Issues, 4 (1), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4 (1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L., Susman, G. I. & Brown, G. R. (1977). An experiment in autonomous working in an American underground coal mine. Human Relations, 30 (3), 201–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H. & Fisch, R. (1974). Change; principles of problem formation and problem resolution. Principles of problem formulation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E. & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25 (2), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual review of psychology, 50, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M. R. (1987). Productive workplaces. Organizing and managing for dignity, meaning, and community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N. A. M., Ruddle, K. & Moore, K. (1999). From organizational development to change management. The emergence of a new profession. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (3), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Spielmannstraße 19, 38106, Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld & Dipl.-Psych. Paul Constantin Endrejat

  2. Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Siegfried-Ehlers-Str. 1, 38440, Wolfsburg, Deutschland

    Dipl.-Psych. Henrike Richter

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dipl.-Psych. Paul Constantin Endrejat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dipl.-Psych. Henrike Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Simone Kauffeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauffeld, S., Endrejat, P.C., Richter, H. (2019). Organisationsentwicklung. In: Kauffeld, S. (eds) Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie für Bachelor. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56013-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56013-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56013-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation