Skip to main content

How to Enhance a General Student Motivation to Study: Asymmetric Paternalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 463 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 750))

Abstract

In the previous chapters, we provided examples of how uncertainty-related examples and ideas help explain, to the students, why a specific material is useful and interesting. In addition to this, we also need to make sure that the students are excited about studying in general, that their levels of interest and commitment remain high. If a math instructor convinces the engineering students that they need to learn math, this should not lead to them getting less interested in studying engineering disciplines, ideally they should be excited about all the topics that they study. In this chapter, we therefore analyze how to increase this general level of interest. It turns out that properly taking uncertainty into account can help with this task as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. O. Kosheleva, F. Modave, Asymmetric paternalism: description of the phenomenon, explanation based on decisions under uncertainty, and possible applications to education, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society NAFIPS’2008, New York, 19–22 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives (Wiley, New York, 1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Raiffa, Decision Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. E.J. Johnson, J. Hershey, J. Meszaros, H. Kunreuther, Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J. Risk Uncertain. 7, 35–53 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Loewenstein, T. Brennan, K.G. Volpp, Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behavior. J. Am. Med. Assoc. (JAMA) 298, 2415–2417 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B.C. Madrian, D.F. Shea, The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116(4), 1149–1187 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. O’Donoghue, M. Rabin, Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 97, 31–46 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Dubois, H. Prade, Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 9, 613–626 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. G.J. Klir, B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. H.T. Nguyen, O. Kosheleva, V. Kreinovich, Is the success of fuzzy logic really paradoxical? or: towards the actual logic behind expert systems. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 11, 295–326 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. H.T. Nguyen, E.A. Walker, A First Course in Fuzzy Logic (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Morales, T.C. Son, Interval methods in robot navigation. Reliab. Comput. 4(1), 55–61 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. H.T. Nguyen, V. Kreinovich, Q. Zuo, Interval-valued degrees of belief: applications of interval computations to expert systems and intelligent control. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. (IJUFKS) 5(3), 317–358 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. K.C. Wu, A robot must be better than a human driver: an application of fuzzy intervals, in NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA’94, Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of The North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, eds. by L. Hall, H. Ying, R. Langari, J. Yen. The Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intelligent Systems Conference, and The NASA Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic, San Antonio, 18–21 December 1994. pp. 171–174

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.C. Wu, Fuzzy interval control of mobile robots. Comput. Electr. Eng. 22(3), 211–219 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Cammerer, S. Issacharoff, G. Loewenstein, T. O’Donoghue, M. Rabin, Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 151(3), 1211–1254 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.H. Thaler, C.R. Sunstein, Libertarian paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(2), 175–179 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Kosheleva .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kosheleva, O., Villaverde, K. (2018). How to Enhance a General Student Motivation to Study: Asymmetric Paternalism. In: How Interval and Fuzzy Techniques Can Improve Teaching. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 750. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55993-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55993-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55991-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55993-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics