Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Präsentismus pp 23–38Cite as

Bedeutung von Präsentismus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Um die Bedeutung von Präsentismus zu beschreiben, sollten verschiedene Perspektiven einbezogen werden. Zum einen ist von Interesse, wie verbreitet das Phänomen innerhalb von Organisationen, aber auch geografisch und kulturell ist. Außerdem muss die Frage gestellt werden, für wen es in welchem Ausmaß von Bedeutung ist. Ebenso wichtig sind die Gründe, warum Erwerbstätige Präsentismus zeigen. Diese Fragen werden in diesem Kapitel beantwortet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Agudelo-Suárez AA, Benavides FG, Felt E, Ronda-Pérez E, Vives-Cases C, García AM (2010) Sickness presenteeism in Spanish-born and immigrant workers in Spain. BMC Public Health 10:791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M (2000) Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health 54:502–509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker-McClearn D, Greasley K, Dale J, Griffith F (2010) Absence management and presenteeism: the pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Hum Resour Manage J 20:311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg E, Mohr G, Busch C (2012) Arbeitspsychologie. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckerman P, Laukkanen E (2010) What makes you work while you are sick? Evidence from a survey of workers. Eur J Public Health 20:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caverley N, Cunningham JB, MacGregor JN (2007) Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. J Manage Stud 44(2):304–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Lacko S, Knapp M (2016) Global patterns of workplace productivity for people with depression: absenteeism and presenteeism costs across eight diverse countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51:1525–1537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garczynski AM, Waldrop JS, Rupprecht EA, Grawitch MJ (2013) Differentiation between work and nonwork self-aspects as a predictor of presenteeism and engagement: cross-cultural differences. J Occup Health Psychol 18(4):417–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerich J (2015) Krankenstand und Präsentismus als betriebliche Gesundheitsindikatoren. Z Pers 29(1):31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson Sendén M, Lovseth LT, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Fridner A (2013) What makes physicians go to work while sick: a comparative study of sickness presenteeism in four European countries (HOUPE). Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV, Crawford WS (2014) A dialectical theory of the decision to go to work: bringing together absenteeism and presenteeism. Hum Resour Manage Rev 24(2):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen CD, Andersen JH (2008) Going ill to work – what personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Soc Sci Med 67:956–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemp P (2004) Presenteeism: at work – but out of it. Harv Bus Rev 82:49–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen V, Aronsson G, Marklund S (2014) Positive and negative reasons for sickness presenteeism in Norway and Sweden: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 4:e004123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johns G (2010) Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav 31:519–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld S (2014) Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Suh EE, Ju S, Choo H, Bae H, Choi H (2016) Sickness experiences of Korean registered nurses at work: a qualitative study on presenteeism. Asian Nursing Res 10:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krane L, Larsen EL, Nielsen CV, Stapelfeldt CM, Johnsen R, Bech MB (2014) Attitudes towards sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in health and care sectors in Norway and Denmark: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 14:880. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/880

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Cooper CL, Lin HY (2013) A cross-cultural examination of presenteeism and supervisory support. Career Develop Int 18(5):440–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKevitt C, Morgan M, Dundas R, Holland WW (1997) Sickness absence and ‚working through‘ illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med 19(3):295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberender & Partner (2010) Chroniker in der Arbeitswelt. In: Abschlussbericht. Verband forschender Arzneimittelhersteller e.V., Berlin/Bayreuth

    Google Scholar 

  • Pit SW, Hansen V (2016) The relationship between lifestyle, occupational health, and work-related factors with presenteeism amongst general practitioners. Arch Environ Occup Health 71(1):49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pohling R, Buruck G, Jungbauer K, Leiter MP (2016) Work-related factors of presenteeism: the mediating role of mental and physical health. J Occup Health Psychol 21(2):220–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson I, Leach D, Doerner N, Smeed M (2012) Poor health but not absent prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med 44:1344–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosvold EO, Bjertness E (2001) Physicians who do not take sick leave: hazardous heroes? Scand J Public Health 29(1):71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnee M, Vogt J (2013) Burnout, Mobbing und Präsentismus – Zusammenhänge und Präventionsmaßnahmen. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Repschläger U (Hrsg) Gesundheitsmonitor 2012. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, S 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Badura B (2011) Präsentismus – Ein Review zum Stand der Forschung. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. http://www.baua.de/de/Publikationen/Fachbeitraege/Gd60.html. Zugegriffen am 14.02.2017

  • Ulich E (2005) Arbeitspsychologie, 6., überarb. und erw. Aufl. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroome E (2006) Prevalence of sickness absence and ‚presenteeism‘: http://eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/2006/07/NL0607019I.htm. Zugegriffen am 21.03.2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FB GS / Wirtschaftspsychologie, Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Daniela Lohaus

  2. H & L Karriereberatung, Lautertal, Deutschland

    Wolfgang Habermann

Authors
  1. Daniela Lohaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang Habermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lohaus, D., Habermann, W. (2018). Bedeutung von Präsentismus. In: Präsentismus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55701-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55701-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55700-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55701-3

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation