Skip to main content

On Axiomatization of Epistemic GDL

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10455))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Game Description Language (GDL) has been introduced as an official language for specifying games in the AAAI General Game Playing Competition since 2005. It was originally designed as a declarative language for representing rules of arbitrary games with perfect information. More recently, an epistemic extension of GDL, called EGDL, has been proposed for representing and reasoning about imperfect information games. In this paper, we develop an axiomatic system for a variant of EGDL and prove its soundness and completeness with respect to the semantics based on the epistemic state transition model. With a combination of action symbols, temporal modalities and epistemic operators, the completeness proof requires novel combinations of techniques used for completeness of propositional dynamic logic and epistemic temporal logic. We demonstrate how to use the proof theory for inferring game properties from game rules.

Most of the work was done while the first author was a postdoc at IRIT, University of Toulouse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van Benthem, J.: Games in dynamic-epistemic logic. Bull. Econ. Res. 53(4), 219–248 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J.: Logic in Games. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., De Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. van Ditmarsch, H., Knight, S.: Partial information and uniform strategies. In: Bulling, N., Torre, L., Villata, S., Jamroga, W., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) CLIMA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8624, pp. 183–198. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09764-0_12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Moses, Y., Halpern, J.Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Genesereth, M., Love, N., Pell, B.: General game playing: overview of the AAAI competition. AI Mag. 26(2), 62–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halpern, J.Y., van Der Meyden, R., Vardi, M.Y.: Complete axiomatizations for reasoning about knowledge and time. SIAM J. Comput. 33(3), 674–703 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y.: A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief. Artif. Intell. 54(3), 319–379 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van der Hoek, W., Pauly, M.: Modal logic for games and information. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic, vol. 3, pp. 1077–1148. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Stud. Log. 75(1), 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, X., van der Meyden, R.: An epistemic strategy logic. In: SR 2014, pp. 35–41 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jamroga, W., van der Hoek, W.: Agents that know how to play. Fundam. Inform. 63(2), 185–219 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, G., Zhang, D., Perrussel, L., Zhang, H.: Epistemic GDL: a logic for representing and reasoning about imperfect information games. In: IJCAI 2016, pp. 1138–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kozen, D., Parikh, R.: An elementary proof of the completeness of PDL. Theor. Comput. Sci. 14(1), 113–118 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Love, N., Hinrichs, T., Haley, D., Schkufza, E., Genesereth, M.: General game playing: Game description language specification. Stanford Logic Group (2006). http://logic.stanford.edu/reports/LG-2006-01.pdf

  17. Pritchard, D.B.: The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants. Games & Puzzles, UK (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rabin, M.O., Scott, D.: Finite automata and their decision problems. IBM J. Res. Dev. 3(2), 114–125 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiffel, S., Thielscher, M.: Reasoning about general games described in GDL-II. In: AAAI 2011, pp. 846–851 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schobbens, P.Y.: Alternating-time logic with imperfect recall. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 85(2), 82–93 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. J. ACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Thielscher, M.: A general game description language for incomplete information games. In: AAAI 2010, pp. 994–999 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thielscher, M.: GDL-III: a proposal to extend the game description language to general epistemic games. In: ECAI 2016, pp. 1630–1631 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, D., Thielscher, M.: A logic for reasoning about game strategies. In: AAAI 2015, pp. 1671–1677 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, D., Thielscher, M.: Representing and reasoning about game strategies. J. Philos. Log. 44(2), 203–236 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Thomas Ã…gotnes and A/Prof. Yi Wang for their valuable suggestions, and special thanks are due to two anonymous referees for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guifei Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, G., Perrussel, L., Zhang, D. (2017). On Axiomatization of Epistemic GDL. In: Baltag, A., Seligman, J., Yamada, T. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10455. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55664-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55665-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics