The Financial Crisis as a Crisis of Democracy: Towards Prudential Regulation Through Public Reasoning

Chapter
Part of the Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht book series (BEITRÄGE, volume 273)

Abstract

The financial crisis challenges our understanding of democracy. Before the crisis there was a widespread conviction that democracies were not only morally superior to authoritarian forms of government, but were also better positioned to deal with severe economic and financial turmoil. Systemic events that exceed purely cyclical ups and downs were believed to be confined to the less democratic parts of the world. The crises in Asia and the post-soviet states of the 1990s seemed to confirm this.

The recent financial crisis, however, has been a crisis in and of the West, while some authoritarian regimes have done much better. It raises the question whether democracy can really produce outcomes that are superior to those of other forms of governance and create a just society.

To explore this question, the paper chooses as a starting point Amartya Sen’s comparative theory of democracy that combines output and input oriented aspects. Sen considers “public reasoning” as the key mechanism through which democracies achieve better outcomes than authoritarian regimes. The paper then looks into some of the causes of the crisis that have been identified in the literature. It shows that each of these causes can be understood as a lack of public reasoning. Indeed, I claim that there is an intrinsic relationship between the prudential regulation of financial markets and public reasoning. Public reasoning is able to optimize decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, which is exactly what prudential regulation is about. This insight has important consequences for the design of the regulatory architecture of financial markets and the interpretation and application of the relevant domestic and international law.

Notes

Acknowledgements

 For helpful comments I am deeply indebted to Armin von Bogdandy, Philipp Dann, Kevin Davis, Christoph Engel, Martin Hellwig, Robert Howse, Silvia Steininger, and the late Sarah P. Woo†.

References

  1. Acharya VV, Schnabl P (2009) How banks played the leverage game. In: Acharya VV, Richardson M (eds) Restoring financial stability, pp 83–100. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya VV, Philippon T, Richardson M, Roubini N (2009) A bird’s-eye view – the financial crisis of 2007–2009: causes and remedies. In: Acharya VV, Richardson M (eds) Restoring financial stability, pp 1–56. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert H (1991) Traktat über kritische Vernunft, 5th edn. UTB, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman EI, Sabri Öncü T, Richardson M, Schmeits A, White LJ (2011) Regulation of rating agencies. In: Acharia VV, Cooley TF, Richardson M, Walter I (eds) Regulating wall street, pp 443–467. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aragonés JR, Blanco C, Dowd K (2001) Incorporating stress tests into market risk modeling. Deriv Q 7(3): 44–49Google Scholar
  6. Bach S, Beznoska M, Steiner V (2011) A wealth tax on the rich to bring down public debt? Revenue and distributional effects of a capital levy, SOEP Paper No. 397, p 11Google Scholar
  7. Basel Committee (2006) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Comprehensive Version, June 2006. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2018
  8. Basel Committee (2009) Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision, January 2009. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs155.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2018
  9. Basel Committee (2011) Revisions to the Basel II market risk framework. February 2011. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs193.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2018
  10. Bentham J (1823 [repr. 1907]) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, 2nd edn p 2. W. Pickering, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Biebricher T (2016) Neoliberalism and law: the case of the constitutional balanced-budget amendment. German LJ 17:835–856Google Scholar
  12. Biondo F (2012) Comparative vs. transcendental approaches to justice: a misleading dichotomy in sen’s the idea of justice. Ratio Juris 25:555–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Black J (2000) Proceduralizing regulation: Part I. Oxf J Leg Stud 20:597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Black J (2001) Proceduralizing regulation: Part II. Oxf J Leg Stud 21:33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blanchard O, Leigh D (2013) Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. IMF Working Paper No. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bogdandy AV, Goldmann M (2013) Sovereign debt restructurings as exercises of public authority: towards a decentralized sovereign insolvency law. In: Esposito C, Li Y, Bohoslavsky JP (eds) Sovereign debt restructurings as exercises of public authority: towards a decentralized sovereign insolvency law, pp 39–70. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Brenner M, Subrahmanyam MG (2009) Short selling. In: Acharya VV, Richardson M (eds) Restoring financial stability, pp 269–275. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017) Labor force statistics from the current population survey, 13 May 2017. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000. Accessed 12 March 2018
  19. Cagetti M, De Nardi M (2008) Wealth inequality: data and models. Macroecon Dyn 12:285–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crouch C (2004) Post-democracy. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  21. Da Silva M (2012) Book review – Amartya Sen’s the idea of justice (2009). German LJ 13:54–66Google Scholar
  22. Davies JB, Sandstrom S, Shorrocks A, Wolff EN (2006) The world distribution of household wealth, p 50. World Institute for Developement Economics Research, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission (2010) Methodological issues, COM(2010) 1 final Annex 1. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4187653/6404656/COM_2010_report_greek_annex_1/4b10d2ba-7a93-4c18-b50f-957f2ad3af8a. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  24. Financial Services Authority (2009) The turner review, March 2009Google Scholar
  25. Goldmann M (2012a) Responsible sovereign lending and borrowing: the view from domestic jurisdictions. Comparative Survey Written for the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/gdsddf2012misc3_en.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2018
  26. Goldmann M (2012b) Stress testing stress tests: challenging the authority of indicators. Paper Presented at the VIIIth GAL Conference, 14–15 June 2012, Rome. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2083594. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  27. Goldmann M, Steininger S (2016) A discourse theoretical approach to sovereign debt restructuring: towards a democratic financial order. German LJ 17:709–746Google Scholar
  28. Habermas J (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vol 1, p 384. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  29. Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms, pp 1–3. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanson S, Kashyap AK, Stein J (2011) A macroprudential approach to financial regulation. J Econ Perspect 25:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayek FA (1979 [ed. 2003]) Recht, Gesetz und Freiheit, p 404. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  32. Heller H (1930) Rechtsstaat oder Diktatur? In: Heller H (ed) Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 2, pp 443–462. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  33. Hourani GF (1956) Ethical value. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour, MIGoogle Scholar
  34. Iversen T (2006) Democracy and capitalism. In: Weingast BR, Wittmann DA (eds) The Oxford handbook of political economy, pp 601–623. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Jolls C (2007) Behavioral law and economics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12879Google Scholar
  36. Kant I (1797) Metaphysik der Sitten. Ripol Classic, MoskauGoogle Scholar
  37. Konzelmann S, Fovargue-Davies M, Schnyder G (2010) Varieties of liberalism: anglo-saxon capitalism in crisis? Centre for Business Research Working Paper No. 403Google Scholar
  38. Krugman P (2007) The conscience of a liberal p 21. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Lienert I (2010) Should advanced countries adopt a fiscal responsibility law? IMF Working Paper WP/10/254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lipscy PY (2011) Democracy and the financial crisis. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, 12 Nov 2011. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1900126. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  41. Macdonald T (2008) Global stakeholder democracy. Power and representation beyond liberal states, p 139. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Marx K (1887) Capital, vol. 1. Swan Sonnenschein, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Mill JS (1859 [2006]) On liberty, p 71. Parker, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Möllers C (2008) Demokratie – Zumutungen und Versprechen, p 22. Wagenbach, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Moody’s (2009) Moody’s downgrades Greece to A2 from A1, 22 Dec 2009. http://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-downgrades-Greece-to-A2-from-A1--PR_192460. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  46. National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States (2011) Financial crisis inquiry reportGoogle Scholar
  47. Nussbaum M (2004) Beyond the social contract: capabilities and global justice. Oxford Dev Stud 32:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (2014) Income inequality update, June 2014. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2014-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  49. Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Polity IV Project (2016) Dataset users manual, p 13. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2016.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  51. Posner R (1979) Utilitarianism, economics, and legal theory. J Leg Stud 8:103–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ratnovski L, Huang R (2009) Why are canadian banks more resilient? IMF Working Paper No. WP/09/152Google Scholar
  53. Rawls J (1972) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Rawls J (1997) The idea of public reason revisited. Univ Chicago Law Rev 64:765–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reinhart CM, Reinhart VR (2010) After the fall. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16334Google Scholar
  57. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2009) This time is different. p xxxi. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  58. Richardson M, Ronen J, Subrahmanyam MG (2011) Securitization reform. In: Acharya VV et al (ed) Regulating Wall Street: the Dodd-Frank Act and the new architecture of global finance, pp 469–489. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rousseau J-J (1762) Du contrat social. Rieder, ParisGoogle Scholar
  60. Schäfer A, Streeck W (eds) (2013) Politics in the age of austerity. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  61. Scott HS (2010) Reducing systemic risk through the reform of capital regulation. J Int Econ Law 13:763–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sen AK (2005) Human rights and capabilities. J Hum Dev 6:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sen AK (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  64. Severin C (2010) Lehman’s langes Begräbnis, 8 July 2010. Neue Züricher Zeitung. http://www.nzz.ch/finanzen/nachrichten/lehmans_langes_begraebnis_1.6472110.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  65. Skopek N, Buchholz S, Blossfeld H-P (2011) Wealth inequality in Europe and the delusive egalitarianism of Scandinaivan countries, MPRA Paper No. 35307Google Scholar
  66. Squam Lake Working Group (2008) A systemic regulator for financial markets, Working Paper No. 4Google Scholar
  67. Streeck W (2011a) The crises of democratic capitalism. New Left Rev 71:5–29Google Scholar
  68. Streeck W (2011b) The crisis in context. Democratic capitalism and its contradictions, MPIfG Discussion Paper No. 15Google Scholar
  69. Streeck W (2014) Buying time: the delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. Verso Books New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Suttle O Debt, default, and two liberal theories of justice. German LJ 17(5):799–834Google Scholar
  71. Taylor JB (2008) The financial crisis and the policy responses: an empirical analysis of what went wrong. In: Bank of Canada (ed) A festschrift in honour of David Dodge’s contributions to Canadian public policy, pp 1–18. Bank of Cananda, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  72. Tietmeyer H (1999) International cooperation and coordination in the area of financial market supervision and surveillance. Report to the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank GovernorsGoogle Scholar
  73. UNCTAD (2012) Principles on promoting responsible sovereign lending and borrowing. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/gdsddf2012misc1_en.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  74. van Aaken A, List C, Luetge C (eds) (2004) Deliberation and decision. Economics, constitutional theory and deliberative democracy. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagschal U (2011) Allheilmittel oder Bugetmimikry: Wie wirksam sind Verschuldungsgrenzen zur Haushaltskonsolidierung? Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften 9(3):352–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wehler H-U (2012) Die neue Umverteilung. Soziale Ungleichheit in Deutschland, p 65. C. H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V., to be exercised by Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurt a.M.Germany

Personalised recommendations