Skip to main content

Emergy Analysis of Biogas-Linked Agricultural System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Biogas Systems in China

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the economic and environmental performance of biogas-linked agricultural system (BLAS) in China based on emergy. A set of emergy indices are incorporated to describe the energy and materials transformation within the system, and an emergy-based CO2 emission indicator (EmCO2) is proposed to achieve low-carbon optimization of the whole system. Emergy synthesis and emergetic ternary diagram are then utilized to evaluate the BLAS and its subsystems, with scenario analysis performed to identify a more sustainable development pathway for the BLAS. Finally, a framework is developed to track dynamical behaviors of the whole system (Level I), transforming process (Level II), and resource component (Level III) simultaneously, and two new indicators, emergy contribution rate (ECR) and emergy supply efficiency (ESE) are proposed to address the contribution and efficiency of resource components within each process. The results showed that BLAS made a favorable contribution to carbon mitigation and was more environment-friendly than the traditional agricultural systems. Scenario analysis demonstrated that continual biogas construction and effective technological revolution were preferable routes to further improve the whole system’s performance. It can be concluded that breeding and biogas subsystems were economic input-dependent. Electricity and diesels were the most efficient components in supplying all the processes in BLAS. The relatively high transformities and the constant descent of sustainability within all processes are the key problem that hinders the promotion of BLAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almeida CMVB, Barrell FA, Giannetti BF. Emergetic ternary diagrams: five examples for application in environmental accounting for decision–making. J Clean Prod. 2007;15(1):63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchettini N. The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by emergy analysis. Ecol Model. 2000;129(2–3):187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchettini N, Panzieri M, Tiezzi E. Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti Area (Italy). J Clean Prod. 2001;9:365–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt–Williams SL. Folio 4. Emergy of Florida Agriculture. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Issued in a Series of Folios. Gainesville: Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Arding, JE. Tranformities working paper. Center for Wetlands, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Bardi E. Folio #3: Emergy of ecosystems. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Issued in a Series of Folios. Gainesville: Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida. Gainesville, FL, USA; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S. Emergy–based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng. 1997;9(1–2):51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S. Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. J Clean Prod. 2002;10(4):321–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S. Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecol Model. 2004a;178(1–2):201–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S. Emergy analysis and environmental accounting. Encycl Energy. 2004b;2:329–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Cohen MJ, Bardi E, Ingwersen WW. Species diversity in the Florida Everglades, USA: a systems approach to calculating biodiversity. Aquat Sci. 2006;68(3):254–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DE. Emergy analysis of human carrying capacity and regional sustainability: an example using the State of Maine. Environ Monit Assess. 1998;51(1):531–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalett O, De Queiroz J, Ortega E. Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Ecol Model. 2006;193(3–4):205–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SQ, Chen B. Sustainability and future alternatives of biogas-linked agrosystem (BLAS) in China: an emergy synthesis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(6):3948–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SQ, Chen B. Energy efficiency and sustainability of complex biogas systems: a 3-level emergetic evaluation. Appl Energy. 2014;115:151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GQ, Jiang MM, Chen B, Yang ZF, Lin C. Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2006;115(1):161–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H. Handbook of natural resource in China. Beijing: Science Press; 1990. p. 545–69 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho O, Ortega E, Comar V. Balanço de Emergia do Brasil (Dados de 1996, 1989e1981). (Emergy balance of Brazil – Statistics of 1996, 1989 e 1981). In: Engenharia Ecológica Agricultura Sustentável (Ecological Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture); 2003. http://www.fea.unicamp.br/docentes/ortega/livro/index.htm Accessed 15 Jul 2004.

  • Cohen MJ, Brown MT, Shepherd KD. Estimating the environmental costs of soil erosion at multiple scales in Kenya using emergy synthesis. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2006;114(2–4):249–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong XB, Ulgiati S, Yan MC, Zhang XS, Gao WS. Energy and emergy evaluation of bioethanol production from wheat in Henan Province, China. Energy Policy. 2008;36(10):3882–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro M, Ulgiati S. Integrated assessment of large–scale biofuel production. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24(5–6):365–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannantoni C, Mirandola A, Tonon S, Ulgiati S. Energy–based, four–sector diagram of benefits as a decision making tool. In: Sergio Ulgiati, editor. Advances in energy studies, vol. 3. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editorial; 2002. p. 575–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti BF, Barrell FA, Almeida CMVB. A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting. J Clean Prod. 2006;14:201–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawking S, Mlodinow L. The grand design. New York: Bantam Books; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Zhang X, Wen A. Discussion on karst soil erosion mechanism in karst mountain area in southwest China. Ecol Environ Sci. 2009;18:2393–8 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang MM, Chen B, Zhou JB, Tao FR, Li Z, Yang ZF, Chen GQ. Emergy account for biomass resource exploitation by agriculture in China. Energy Policy. 2007;35(9):4704–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju LP, Chen B. Embodied energy and emergy evaluation of a typical biodiesel production chain in China. Ecol Model. 2011;222(14):2385–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan SF, Qin P, Lu HF. Emergy analysis of eco-economic system. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2002 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT. Self–organization, transformity, and information. Science. 1988;242(4882):1132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT. Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT. Folio 2. Emergy of Global Processes. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Issued in a Series of Folios. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT, Odum EC. Energy analysis overview of nations. Working Paper WP–83–82, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria; 1983. p. 421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonon S, Brown MT, Mitandola A, Stoppato A, Ulgiati S. Integration of thermodynamic, economic and environmental parameter for the evaluation of energy systems. In: Sergio Ulgiati, editor. Advances in energy studies, vol. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editorial; 2000. p. 635–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Ascione M, Zucaro A, Campanella L. Emergy-based complexity measures in natural and social systems. Ecol Ind. 2011;11(5):1185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Brown MT. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man–made ecosystems. Ecol Model. 1998;108:23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Brown MT. Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions: the case of electricity production. J Clean Prod. 2002;10:335–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Odum HT, Bastianoni S. Emergy analysis of Italian agricultural system. The role of energy quality and environmental inputs. Trends in Ecological Physical Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 1993. p. 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MX, Xia XF, Chai YH, Liu JG. Life cycle energy conservation and emissions reduction benefits of rural household biogas project. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2010;26:245–50 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei XM, Chen B, Qu YH, Lin C, Chen GQ. Emergy analysis for ‘Four in One’ peach production system in Beijing. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2009;14(3):946–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Chen B. Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China—a case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County. Appl Energy. 2014;118(1):173–82.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Jiang MM, Chen B, Zhou BJ, Chen GQ, Li SC. Solar emergy evaluation for Chinese economy. Energy Policy. 2010;38:875–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LX, Yang ZF, Chen GQ. Emergy analysis of cropping–grazing system in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Energy Policy. 2007a;35(7):3843–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang PD, Jia GM, Wang G. Contribution to emission reduction of CO2 and SO2 by household biogas construction in rural China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2007b;11:1903–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SY, Zhang B, Cai ZF. Emergy analysis of a farm biogas project in China: a biophysical perspective of agricultural ecological engineering. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2010;15(5):1408–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, B., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A. (2017). Emergy Analysis of Biogas-Linked Agricultural System. In: Biogas Systems in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55498-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55498-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55496-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55498-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics