Skip to main content

Classification of Ventral and Incisional Hernias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Laparo-endoscopic Hernia Surgery

Abstract

Classifications are an expression of the need for structure and organization within complex realities. The manner in which complex phenomena are classified is fundamental to how they are understood and dealt with ► [1]. It is therefore necessary that classification systems are subjected to validation. The first step in this process can be the retrospective evaluation of the data that were collected and the second step prospective confirmation of the validation. A classification system is accepted as useful if it can generate verifiable hypotheses. In the validation process, a classification is tested for its utility in answering specific questions, a test that can have one of three results: the system is verified (its methodology confirmed), it is falsified (its methodology refuted), or the test is inconclusive (neither confirmed nor refuted). Validation of a classification confirms that it has met the requirements for its intended use. Any classification, however, is valid only so long as it can withstand or adapt to continued critical testing based on continuous refinement of the knowledge on which it is based. Unlike truth, provisional validation is based on a large body of basic data ► [2]. Every type of classification thus relies on empirical validation. The goal is to create an evidentiary foundation upon which to build as knowledge increases ► [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Loves C. Trends and pitfalls with nomenclatures and classifications in medicine. Into J Med Inform. 1998;52:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Popper K. Logik der Forschung. Wien: Julius Springer; 1935.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Museums FE, Deisenberg EB, Peters E, Agrestic F, Brevet F, Campanili G, et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. Hernia. 2013;17:423–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chute CG. Clinical classification and terminology: some history and current observations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:298–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy J, Kossmann CE. Nomenclatures in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1973;61:238–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar A, Yip YL, Smith B, Marwede D, Novotny D. An ontology for carcinoma classification for clinical bioinformatics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:635–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevrel JP, Rath AM. Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2000;4:7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts´ meeting. Langebeck’s. Arch Surg. 2001;386:65–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS, Debus ES, Malafaia O, Czeczko NG, et al. An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:383–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:407–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D, Ventral Hernia Working Group. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148:544–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz UA, Winkler MS, Härtel RW, Fleischhacker A, Wiegering A, Isbert C, et al. Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification. Hernia. 2012;18:19–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT. Indikationen zur laparoskopischen Versorgung großer Narbenhernien. Chirurg. 2014;86:338–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sellers AH. The clinical classification of malignant tumours: the TNM system. Can Med Assoc J. 1971;105:836.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Payne PR, Mendonça EA, Johnson SB, Starren JB. Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: a methodological review. Biomed Inform. 2007;40:582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz UA, Fabian M, Ferzli G, Fortelny R, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (international Endohernia society IEHS) part I. Surg Endosc. 2013;28:2–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Conze J, Prescher A, Kisielinski K, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Technical consideration for subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2005;9:84–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Losanoff JE, Basson MD, Laker S, Weiner M, Webber JD, Gruber SA. Subxiphoid incisional hernias after median sternotomy. Hernia. 2007;11:473–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Varnell B, Bachman S, Quick J, Vitamvas M, Ramshaw B, Oleynikov D. Morbidity associated with laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias. Am J Surg. 2008;196:983–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg. 2002;73:474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B. Collagen I/III and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1 and 13 in the fascia of patients with incisional hernias. J Investig Surg. 2001;14:47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sørensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT, Kallehave F, Jørgensen LN. Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch Surg. 2005;140:119–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jenkins ED, Yom VH, Melman L, Pierce RA, Schuessler RB, Frisella MM, et al. Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1872–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klinge U. Mesh for hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2008;95:539–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT. Eingriffsspezifische Komplikationen der Hernienchirurgie. Chirurg. 2014;85:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz Dietz UA, Spor L, Germer CT. Therapie der Netz-(Implantat) Infektion. Chirurg. 2011;82:208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich A. Dietz MSc, (UFPR) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dietz, U.A., Bingener-Casey, J. (2018). Classification of Ventral and Incisional Hernias. In: Bittner, R., Köckerling, F., Fitzgibbons, Jr., R., LeBlanc, K., Mittal, S., Chowbey, P. (eds) Laparo-endoscopic Hernia Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55491-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55493-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics