Abstract
Classifications are an expression of the need for structure and organization within complex realities. The manner in which complex phenomena are classified is fundamental to how they are understood and dealt with ► [1]. It is therefore necessary that classification systems are subjected to validation. The first step in this process can be the retrospective evaluation of the data that were collected and the second step prospective confirmation of the validation. A classification system is accepted as useful if it can generate verifiable hypotheses. In the validation process, a classification is tested for its utility in answering specific questions, a test that can have one of three results: the system is verified (its methodology confirmed), it is falsified (its methodology refuted), or the test is inconclusive (neither confirmed nor refuted). Validation of a classification confirms that it has met the requirements for its intended use. Any classification, however, is valid only so long as it can withstand or adapt to continued critical testing based on continuous refinement of the knowledge on which it is based. Unlike truth, provisional validation is based on a large body of basic data ► [2]. Every type of classification thus relies on empirical validation. The goal is to create an evidentiary foundation upon which to build as knowledge increases ► [3].
References
Loves C. Trends and pitfalls with nomenclatures and classifications in medicine. Into J Med Inform. 1998;52:141–8.
Popper K. Logik der Forschung. Wien: Julius Springer; 1935.
Museums FE, Deisenberg EB, Peters E, Agrestic F, Brevet F, Campanili G, et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. Hernia. 2013;17:423–33.
Chute CG. Clinical classification and terminology: some history and current observations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:298–303.
Kennedy J, Kossmann CE. Nomenclatures in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1973;61:238–52.
Kumar A, Yip YL, Smith B, Marwede D, Novotny D. An ontology for carcinoma classification for clinical bioinformatics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:635–40.
Chevrel JP, Rath AM. Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2000;4:7–11.
Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts´ meeting. Langebeck’s. Arch Surg. 2001;386:65–73.
Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS, Debus ES, Malafaia O, Czeczko NG, et al. An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:383–8.
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:407–14.
Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D, Ventral Hernia Working Group. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148:544–58.
Dietz UA, Winkler MS, Härtel RW, Fleischhacker A, Wiegering A, Isbert C, et al. Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification. Hernia. 2012;18:19–30.
Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT. Indikationen zur laparoskopischen Versorgung großer Narbenhernien. Chirurg. 2014;86:338–45.
Sellers AH. The clinical classification of malignant tumours: the TNM system. Can Med Assoc J. 1971;105:836.
Payne PR, Mendonça EA, Johnson SB, Starren JB. Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: a methodological review. Biomed Inform. 2007;40:582–602.
Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz UA, Fabian M, Ferzli G, Fortelny R, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (international Endohernia society IEHS) part I. Surg Endosc. 2013;28:2–29.
Conze J, Prescher A, Kisielinski K, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Technical consideration for subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2005;9:84–7.
Losanoff JE, Basson MD, Laker S, Weiner M, Webber JD, Gruber SA. Subxiphoid incisional hernias after median sternotomy. Hernia. 2007;11:473–9.
Varnell B, Bachman S, Quick J, Vitamvas M, Ramshaw B, Oleynikov D. Morbidity associated with laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias. Am J Surg. 2008;196:983–7.
Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg. 2002;73:474–80.
Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B. Collagen I/III and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1 and 13 in the fascia of patients with incisional hernias. J Investig Surg. 2001;14:47–54.
Sørensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT, Kallehave F, Jørgensen LN. Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch Surg. 2005;140:119–23.
Jenkins ED, Yom VH, Melman L, Pierce RA, Schuessler RB, Frisella MM, et al. Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1872–7.
Klinge U. Mesh for hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2008;95:539–40.
Dietz Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT. Eingriffsspezifische Komplikationen der Hernienchirurgie. Chirurg. 2014;85:97–104.
Dietz Dietz UA, Spor L, Germer CT. Therapie der Netz-(Implantat) Infektion. Chirurg. 2011;82:208–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dietz, U.A., Bingener-Casey, J. (2018). Classification of Ventral and Incisional Hernias. In: Bittner, R., Köckerling, F., Fitzgibbons, Jr., R., LeBlanc, K., Mittal, S., Chowbey, P. (eds) Laparo-endoscopic Hernia Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55491-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55493-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)