Advertisement

CSR in internationalen Lieferketten: Interkulturelle Kompetenz als Voraussetzung zur Vermeidung von Werteimperialismus

  • Nick Lin-HiEmail author
  • Karsten Müller
  • Julia-Marie Degenhardt
  • Regina Kempen
  • Alexander Meier
Chapter
Part of the Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility book series (MRCOSORE)

Zusammenfassung

Immer mehr Unternehmen beschäftigen sich mit Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) und versprechen, ihrer gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung gerecht zu werden. Diese Verantwortung bezieht sich dabei nicht nur auf den internen Organisationsbereich, sondern erstreckt sich auch auf vorgelagerte Wertschöpfungsstufen. Entsprechend stehen Unternehmen vor der Aufgabe, grundlegende Arbeits-, Umwelt- und Sozialstandards in ihren internationalen Lieferketten sicherzustellen. Neben der Ausgestaltung von konkreten Maßnahmen für die Verankerung von CSR bei Lieferanten stellt sich auch die Frage, welche Standards im internationalen Kontext sinnvollerweise anzuwenden sind. Typischerweise tendieren Unternehmen dazu, bei ihren Lieferanten westliche Maßstäbe anzulegen, infolgedessen die Gefahr eines Werteimperialismus droht. Der vorliegende Beitrag adressiert diese Problematik und schlägt die Brücke zur Bedeutung von interkultureller Kompetenz für einen wertschaffenden Umgang mit CSR in Lieferketten.

Literatur

  1. Albert H (1968) Traktat über kritische Vernunft. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaeshi KM, Osuji OK, Nnodim P (2008) Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. J Bus Ethics 81(1):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen M, Skjoett-Larsen T (2009) Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Manag Int J 14(2):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apple (2013a) Fair Labor Association begins inspections of Foxconn. https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/02/13Fair-Labor-Association-Begins-Inspections-of-Foxconn.html. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  5. Apple (2013b) Apple Supplier Responsibility – 2013 Progress Report. https://images.apple.com/euro/supplier-responsibility/f/generic/pdf/Apple_SR_2013_Progress_Report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  6. Arthur C (2012) Apple supplier audit begins with Foxconn plant. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/feb/13/apple-supplier-audit-foxconn. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  7. Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ Sci 1(2):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee SB (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Crit Sociol (Eugene) 4(1):51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barboza D (2009) IPhone maker in China is under fire after a suicide. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/27/technology/companies/27apple.html. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  10. Bennett MJ (1986) A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. Int J Intercult Relations 10(2):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black LD (2006) Corporate social responsibility as capability: The case of BHP Billiton. J Corp Citizsh 23:25–38Google Scholar
  12. Blowfield ME, Dolan CS (2008) Stewards of virtue? The ethical dilemma of CSR in African agriculture. Dev Change 39(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumberg I, Lin-Hi N (2015) Business case-driven management of CSR: Does managers’ “cherry picking” behavior foster irresponsible business practices? Bus Prof Ethics J 33(4):321–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2006) Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. J Bus Ethics 69(2):111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Buren HJ III, Patterson KD (2012) Institutional predictors of and complements to industry self-regulation with regard to labor practices. Bus Soc Rev 117(3):357–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan J, Ngai P (2010) Suicide as protest for the new generation of Chinese migrant workers: Foxconn, global capital, and the state. Asia-Pacific J Japan Focus 8(37):1–33Google Scholar
  17. Deardorff DK (2006) Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. J Stud Int Educ 10(3):241–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolan CS (2010) Virtual moralities: The mainstreaming of Fairtrade in Kenyan tea fields. Geoforum 41(1):33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duhigg C, Barboza D (2012) In China, human costs are built into an iPad. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  20. Fair Labor Association (2012) Independent investigation of Apple supplier, Foxconn. www.fairlabor.org/sites/default/files/documents/reports/foxconn_investigation_report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  21. Fröhlich E (2015) CSR und Beschaffung. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, GLOBE associates (2004) Leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 nations. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  23. Joutsenvirta M, Uusitalo L (2010) Cultural competences: An important resource in the industry – NGO Dialog. J Bus Ethics 91(3):379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan FR, Lund-Thomsen P (2011) CSR as imperialism: Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. J Chang Manag 11(1):73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan FR, Munir KA, Willmott H (2007) A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organ Stud 28(7):1055–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan FR, Westwood R, Boje DM (2010) “I feel like a foreign agent”: NGOs and corporate social responsibility interventions into Third World child labor. Hum Relations 63(9):1417–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin-Hi N (2009) Eine Theorie der Unternehmensverantwortung: Die Verknüpfung von Gewinnerzielung und gesellschaftlichen Interessen. Erich Schmidt, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin-Hi N, Blumberg I (2017) The power(lessness) of industry self-regulation to promote responsible labor standards: Insights from the Chinese toy industry. J Bus Ethics 143(4):789–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin-Hi N, Blumberg I (2018) The link between (not) practicing CSR and corporate reputation: Psychological foundations and managerial implications. J Bus Ethics 150(1):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin-Hi N, Müller K (2013) The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. J Bus Res 66(10):1928–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu S, Volcic Z, Gallois C (2015) Introducing intercultural communication: global cultures and contexts, 2. Aufl. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Locke R, Amengual M, Mangla A (2009) Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Polit Soc 37(3):319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lund-Thomsen P (2008) The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: Five myths and five recommendations. Dev Change 39(6):1005–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moosmayer DC, Davis SM (2016) Staking cosmopolitan claims: How firms and NGOs talk about supply chain responsibility. J Bus Ethics 135(3):403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Motlagh J (2014) The ghosts of Rana Plaza. In Bangladesh, one year after the worst accident in the history of the garment industry, recovery remains a fragile process, justice seems elusive, and reform has a long way to go. Va Q Rev 90(2):44–89Google Scholar
  36. De Neve G (2014) Fordism, flexible specialization and CSR: How Indian garment workers critique neoliberal labour regimes. Ethnography 5(2):184–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osterhammel J (1995) Kolonialismus: Geschichte, Formen, Folgen. C.H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  38. Petersen HL, Lemke F (2015) Mitigating reputational risks in supply chains. Supply Chain Manag Int J 20(5):495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pies I, Hielscher S, Beckmann M (2009) Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Bus Ethics Q 19(3):375–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Said EW (1993) Culture and imperialism. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Stüdlein Y (1997) Management von Kulturunterschieden: Phasenkonzept für internationale strategische Allianzen. Springer, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Suchanek A (2007) Ökonomische Ethik, 2. Aufl. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  44. The Economist (2010) Suicides at Foxconn. Light and death. http://www.economist.com/node/16231588. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  45. Tomlinson J (1991) Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Topping A (2009) Apple factory worker kills himself after disappearance of prototype. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/22/apple-worker-suicide-prototype-missing. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2018Google Scholar
  47. Völker F (2014) Der Investitionscharakter von CSR bei Familienunternehmen: Eine theoretische und empirische Vergleichsanalyse. Springer, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward C, Bochner S, Furnham A (2005) The psychology of culture shock. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu K, Li W (2013) An ethical stakeholder approach to crisis communication: A case study of Foxconn’s 2010 employee suicide crisis. J Bus Ethics 117(2):371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Lin-Hi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karsten Müller
    • 2
  • Julia-Marie Degenhardt
    • 1
  • Regina Kempen
    • 2
  • Alexander Meier
    • 2
  1. 1.Universität VechtaVechtaDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität OsnabrückOsnabrückDeutschland

Personalised recommendations