Abstract
In Chaps. 3, 4 and 5 we have developed a simple but increasingly complex general equilibrium model. Starting with the standard textbook version of a private, closed economy we showed how the different pieces of the model interact with each other to give rise to a system of equations that capture and describe market equilibrium. The addition of the government and the external sector, as well as the modification of the labor market to allow for unemployment, provided a more realistic picture of an actual economy and laid the grounds for the study of various policy issues. In each of the examples used, however, the specification of the model parameters was arbitrary, except for a choice of units that yielded convenient solution values for prices and output levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bacharach, M. (1965). Estimating non-negative matrices from marginal data. International Economic Review, 6(3), 294–310.
Bacharach, M. (1970). Biproportional matrices and input–output change. London: Cambridge University Press.
Cardenete, M. A., & Sancho, F. (2004). Sensitivity of simulation results to competing SAM updates. The Review of Regional Studies, 34(1), 37–56.
Chenery, H. B., & Watanabe, T. (1958). International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica, 26(4), 487–521.
Dawkins, C., Srinivasan, T. N., & Whalley, J. (2001). Calibration, Chap. 58. In J. Heckman & E. E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 5). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Harrison, G., Jones, R., Kimbell, L., & Wiggle, R. (1993). How robust is applied general equilibrium analysis? Journal of Policy Modeling, 15(1), 99–115.
Harrison, G., & Vinod, H. D. (1992). The sensitivity analysis of applied general equilibrium. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 357–362.
Kehoe, T. J., Polo, C., & Sancho, F. (1995). An evaluation of the performance of an applied general equilibrium model of the Spanish economy. Economic Theory, 6(1), 115–141.
Keuning, S., & de Ruitjer, W. (1988). Guidelines to the construction of a social accounting matrix. Review of Income and Wealth, 34(1), 71–100.
Le Masné, P. (1990). Le system productif français face a ses voisins europeens. In A. Archanbauld & O. Arkhipof (Eds.), La comptabilité national face au défi international. Paris: Economica.
Lima, M. C., Cardenete, M. A., & Sancho, F. (2016). Validating policy-induced economic change using sequential general equilibrium SAMs. Journal of Forecasting. doi:10.1002/for.2424.
Lucena, A. E, & Serrano, M. 2006. Building a social accounting matrix within the ESA95 framework: Obtaining a dataset for applied general equilibrium modelling. University of Barcelona. Digital Research Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/11756
Mansur, A., & Whalley, J. (1984). Numerical specification of applied general equilibrium models: Estimation, calibration and data. In H. Scarf & J. Shoven (Eds.), Applied general equilibrium analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDougall, R. (1999). Entropy theory and RAS are friends (GTAP WP 6). Purdue University.
Miller, R., & Blair, P. (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pyatt, G. (1988). A SAM approach to modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10, 327–352.
Reiner, K., & Roland-Holst, D. W. (1992). A detailed social accounting matrix for the United States. Economic Systems Research, 4(2), 173–187.
Robinson, S., Cattaneo, A., & El-Said, M. (2001). Updating and estimating a social accounting matrix using cross-entropy methods. Economic Systems Research, 13(1), 47–64.
Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sancho, F. (2009). Calibration of CES functions for ‘real-world’ multisectoral modeling. Economic Systems Research, 21(1), 45–58.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Stone, R., & Brown, A. (1962). A computable model of economic growth. London: Chapman & Hall.
Stone, R., & Corbit, J. D. (1997). The accounts of society. The American Economic Review, 87(6), 17–29.
Thorbecke, E. (2000). The use of social accounting matrices in modeling. Paper presented at the 26th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cracow.
Waters, E. C., Holland, D. W., & Weber, B. A. (1997). Economic impacts of a property tax limitation: A computable general equilibrium analysis of Oregon’s measure 5. Land Economics, 73, 72–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2: GAMS Code for the Updating of a Social Accounting Matrix
$TITLE SAM UPDATING: CHAPTER 6 Tables 6.5,6.6,6.7 OPTION NLP=CONOPT; SET I accounts in SAM /1*6/; ALIAS (J,I); TABLE A0(I,J) prior SAM 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 20 50 0 0 15 15 2 30 25 0 0 35 10 3 40 10 0 0 0 0 4 10 15 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 30 20 0 0 6 0 0 20 5 0 0; PARAMETER Z1(I) new marginals /1 104.99 2 105.23 3 62.00 4 32.61 5 65.29 6 29.32 /; VARIABLES D Minimand X(I,J) Estimated SAM cells SICOS(I) Cosine similarity; D.L = 0; X.L(I,J) = A0(I,J); X.LO(I,J) = 0; SICOS.L(I) = 0.5; SICOS.LO(J)=0; SICOS.UP(J) = 1; EQUATIONS GOAL_E Objective function: Entropy GOAL_L Objective function: Least squares GOAL_C Objective function: Cosine similarity ROWSUM(I) Row sum restrictions COLSUM(I) Column sum restrictions ZERO(I,J) Zero structure SIMCOS(I) Column similarity; $ONTEXT Three possible objective functions according to three closeness philosophies: entropy, least squares and similarity. The user can select which of the corresponding three models will be solved. Solution data is saved in a MS Excel sheet $OFFTEXT GOAL_E.. D =E= SUM((I,J)$A0(I,J), X(I,J)*LOG(X(I,J)/A0(I,J))); GOAL_L.. D =E= SUM((I,J)$A0(I,J), SQR(X(I,J)-A0(I,J))) ; GOAL_C.. D =E= -SUM(J, SICOS(J)); ROWSUM(I).. SUM(J, X(I,J)) =E= Z1(I); COLSUM(I).. SUM(J, X(J,I)) =E= Z1(I); ZERO(I,J).. X(I,J)$(A0(I,J) EQ 0) =E= 0; SIMCOS(I).. SICOS(I) =E= SUM(J$A0(J,I),X(J,I)*A0(J,I)) / SQRT(SUM(J$A0(J,I),SQR(X(J,I)))*SUM(J$A0(J,I),SQR(A0(J,I)))); MODEL ENTROPY /GOAL_E, ROWSUM, COLSUM, ZERO/; MODEL LEASTSQUARES /GOAL_L, ROWSUM, COLSUM, ZERO/; MODEL COSINE /GOAL_C, ROWSUM, COLSUM, ZERO, SIMCOS/; PARAMETER SAM(I,J) to upload updating result; SOLVE ENTROPY MINIMIZING D USING NLP; SAM(I,J) = X.L(I,J); $LIBINCLUDE XLDUMP SAM UPDATES.XLS ENTROPY SOLVE LEASTSQUARES MINIMIZING D USING NLP; SAM(I,J) = X.L(I,J); $LIBINCLUDE XLDUMP SAM UPDATES.XLS LEASTSQUARES SOLVE COSINE MINIMIZING D USING NLP; SAM(I,J) = X.L(I,J); $LIBINCLUDE XLDUMP SAM UPDATES.XLS SIMILARITY
Appendix 3: Proximity Indicators
Consider two square matrices \( {\mathbf{A}}^1=\left({a}_{ij}^1\right) \) and \( {\widehat{\mathbf{A}}}^1=\left({\widehat{a}}_{ij}^1\right) \) such that for all j = 1 , 2 , … , n we have:
Define:
By the way, notice that in our example we have in fact that \( \overline{a}=\widehat{\overline{a}} \). Then:
Le Masné (1990) proximity index with LM ∈ [0, 1]:
Chenery and Watanabe (1958) proximity index with CW ∈ [0, 1]:
Pearson correlation with R 2 ∈ [0, 1]:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cardenete, M.A., Guerra, AI., Sancho, F. (2017). Data Base and Model Calibration. In: Applied General Equilibrium. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54893-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54893-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54892-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54893-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)