Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Lehrbuch der Ökobilanzierung pp 155–179Cite as

Neue Ansätze

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 9641 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In den vorhergehenden Kapiteln wurde die klassische Ökobilanzmethode vorgestellt, wie sie von Unternehmen im Alltag zur Dokumentation der Umweltbelastung eines Produkts oder für Produktvergleiche verwendet wird. In diesem Kapitel gehen wir auf methodische Ansätze ein, die für ausgewählte Fragestellungen geeignet sein können oder vor allem in größeren Projekten und umfangreicheren Untersuchungen eingesetzt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beispiel einer politischen Maßnahme: Gemäß EU-Richtlinie 2009/28/EG der Europäischen Union (European Commission 2009) sollen erneuerbare Energien bis 2020 im Verkehrssektor einen Anteil von 10 % des Energieverbrauchs decken.

Literatur

  • Alig M, Frischknecht R, Nathani C, Hellmüller P, Stolz P (2019) Umweltatlas Lieferketten Schweiz. treeze Ltd.& Rütter Soceco AG, Uster & Rüschlikon

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin M (1997) Lebenserwartung. Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ, Samstag/Sonntag 7./8. Juni 1997, S 80

    Google Scholar 

  • Benetto E (2016) Computationally based approaches to consequential LCA: agent based and economic modelling. Paper presented at the 62nd LCA Forum, Zürich, 9 September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc I (Hrsg) (2015) EcoSD Annual Workshop Consequential LCA. MINES ParisTech, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Trust, DEFRA (2011) PAS 2050:2011: specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standard, BSi, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll L (1893) Sylvie and Bruno concluded. Macmillan and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA, Mann MK, Norris G (2002) Report on the International workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. In: Proceedings from: electricity data for life cycle inventories, held at the Breidenbach Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 23–25 October 2001, US-EPA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M, Pengue WA (2008) LCA of soybean meal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):240–254. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.06.342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Flysjö A (2014) Generic model for calculating carbon footprint of milk using four different life cycle assessment modelling approaches. J Clean Prod 73(2014):146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T (2002) Limitations of consequential LCA. In: Proceedings from: InLCA/LCM 2002 E-Conference, 20–25 May 2002. www.lcacenter.org/lca-lcm/pdf/Consequential-LCA.pdf

  • Ekvall T, Weidema B (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Ciroth A, Hofstetter P, Norris G (2004) Evaluation of attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable resources (Renewable Energy Directive-RED). Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making: scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. 3-9520661-3-3. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2002) An introduction to attributional and consequential LCI models – properties and differences. 17. Diskussionsforum Ökobilanzen, Zürich. www.texma.org/LCA-Forum/Documentation/AbstractsDF17.htm

  • Frischknecht R (2006) Notions on the design and use of an ideal regional or global LCA database. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Special Issue 1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2007) Modelling of product systems in life cycle inventory analysis: synopsis of attributional and consequential LCI models – properties and differences (Hrsg) Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse, Zentralabteilung technikbedingte Stoffströme, Uster, Karlsruhe. www.netzwerk-lebenszyklusdaten.de/cms/content/site/lca/Home/Aktivitaeten/Projektberichte

  • Frischknecht R, Nathani C, Stolz P, Wyss F, Itten R (2015) Extension of a disaggregated input-output table with environmental data for the year 2008. treeze Ltd & Rütter Soceco AG, commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Uster & Rüschlikon, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Benetto E, Dandres T, Heijungs R, Roux C, Schrijvers D, Wernet G, Yang Y, Messmer A, Tschuemperlin L (2017) LCA and decision making: when and how to use consequential LCA; 62nd LCA Forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, 9 September 2016. Int J LCA 22(2):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1248-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Stucki M (2010) Scope-dependent modelling of electricity supply in life cycle assessments. Int J LCA 15(8):806–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greendelta (2019) openLCA v1.9. 1.9, ecoinvent v3.5 Aufl., Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (1997) Economic drama and the environmental stage; Formal derivation of algorithmic tools for environmental analysis and decision-support from a unified epistemological principle. Centre for Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • IDF (International Dairy Federation) (2015) A common carbon footprint approach for the dairy sector. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 479

    Google Scholar 

  • Igos E, Rugani B, Rege S, Benetto E, Drouet L, Zachary D (2015) Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input-output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios. Appl Energy 145:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), Switzerland, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • KBOB, eco-bau, IPB (2016) KBOB Ökobilanzdatenbestand DQRv2:2016; Grundlage für die KBOB-Empfehlung 2009/1:2016: Ökobilanzdaten im Baubereich, Stand 2016. Koordinationskonferenz der Bau- und Liegenschaftsorgane der öffentlichen Bauherren c/o BBL Bundesamt für Bauten und Logistik

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W (1936) Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States. Rev Econ Stat 3:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W (1985) Input-Output Analysis. In: Bever MB (Hrsg) Encyclopedia of materials science and engineering, Bd 3. Pergamon Press, Oxford, S 2339–2349

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutel C, Pfister S, Hellweg S (2012) GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol 46:1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203117z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’Amico JA, Itoua I, Strand H, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRé Consultants (2019) SimaPro 9.0.0. 9.0.0, ecoinvent data v3.5 Aufl., Amersfoort, NL

    Google Scholar 

  • Querini F, Benetto E (2015) Combining agent-based modeling and life cycle assessment for the evaluation of mobility policies. Environ Sci Technol 49:1744–1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard J, Zah R, Faist Emmenegger M, Hilty LM (2017) Regionalized LCI modeling: The case of regionalized cotton datasets. In: Otjacques B, HItelberger P, Naumann S, Wohlgemuth V (Hrsg) EnviroInfo2017, From Science to Society: The Bridge provided by Environmental Informatics. Shaker Verlag & Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth A, Wiener N (1945) The role of models in science. Philos Sci 12(4):316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Gobain ISOVER (2014) Umweltproduktdeklaration nach SN EN 15804 für unkaschierte Glaswolle; Bindemittel: biogen (pflanzlich). Saint-Gobain ISOVER AG, Lucens

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Vigon B (Hrsg) (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases; A basis for greener processes and products. United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen MA, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, de Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0007-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonini D, Hamelin L, Wenzel H, Astrup T (2012) Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: A consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. Environ Sci Technol 46:13521–13530. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3024435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Bulavskaya T, Giljum S, de Koning A, Lutter S, Simas M, Stadler K, Wood R (2014) The global resource footprint of nations; carbon, water, land and materials embodied in trade and final consumption calculated with EXIOBASE 2.1. CML, TNO, WU, NTNU, Leiden/Delft/Vienna/Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Rege S, Marvuglia A, Thénie J, Haurie A, Benetto E (2013) Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg. Int J LCA 18(8):1593–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0604-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4(3):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B (2016) Consequential system boundaries: Social responsibility, rebound effects and aggregation error. Paper presented at the 62nd LCA Forum, Zürich, 9. September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R, Stadler K, Bulavskaya T, Lutter S, Giljum S, de Koning A, Kuenen J, Schütz H, Acosta-Fernández J, Usubiaga A, Simas M, Ivanova O, Weinzettel J, Schmidt JH, Merciai S, Tukker A (2015) Global sustainability accounting-developing EXIOBASE for multi-regional footprint analysis. Sustainability 7(1):138–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. treeze GmbH, Uster, Schweiz

    Rolf Frischknecht

Authors
  1. Rolf Frischknecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Frischknecht .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frischknecht, R. (2020). Neue Ansätze. In: Lehrbuch der Ökobilanzierung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54763-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation