Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Gruppenpsychotherapie pp 211–224Cite as

Wie wissenschaftliche Evidenz praktisch genutzt werden kann: Gruppenpsychotherapie und die »Leitlinien für die klinische Praxis« der American Group Psychotherapy Association (AGPA)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Psychotherapie: Praxis ((ÜSÜR))

Zusammenfassung

Nicht nur in der Versorgung von Menschen mit seelischen Problemen wird heute sehr darauf geachtet, dass Praktiker wirklich effektive oder evidenzbasierte Behandlungen anwenden und beherrschen. Die letzten Jahre standen ganz im Zeichen evidenzbasierter Praxis, worunter nach der Definition des Institute of Medicine (2001) „die Integration qualitativ hochwertiger Forschungsergebnisse mit klinischem Wissen und klinischen Werten“ verstanden wird. Tatsächlich erweisen sich Praktiker gelegentlich widerspenstig gegenüber evidenzbasierter Praxis, da sie diese als interferierend mit ihrer beruflichen Autonomie, als Einschränkung ihrer ökonomischen Möglichkeiten und auch als Einflussnahme der Gesundheitspolitik auf ihr Handeln erleben. Deshalb ist es sinnvoll zu versuchen, evidenzbasierte Praxismodelle zu entwickeln, die nicht nur effektiv, sondern in den Augen praktizierender Therapeuten auch schon klinisch-praktisch implementiert sind. Zehn ausgewählte Themen der gruppentherapeutischen Praxis werden unter diesem Gesichtspunkt dargestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • AGPA (2002). Guidelines for ethics (revised). New York: American Group Psychotherapy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, M. (2008). A clinician’s take on evidence-based group psychotherapy: A commentary. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 6(11), 1279–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H., Burlingame, G. M., Flores, P., Greene, L., Joyce, A., Kobos, J., Leszcz, M., Macnair- Semands, R., Piper, W., Slocum McEneaney, Feirman, D. (2008). Clinical practice guidelines for group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58(4), 455–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. W. (2003) Conceptualizing process. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 53(2), 225–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A. & Johnson, J. E. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross (Hrsg.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (S. 71–88). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., MacKenzie, D. & Strauss, B. (2004). Small group treatment: Evidence for effectiveness and mechanisms of change. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (5. Aufl., S. 647–696). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Strauss, B., Joyce, A., MacNair-Semands, R. MacKenzie, K., Ogrodniczuk, J., et al. (2006). Core Battery-Revised: An assessment tool kit for promoting optimal group selection, process, and outcome. New York: American Group Psychotherapy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay, L. G., Goldfried, M. R., Hayes, A. M. (1996). The study of change in psychotherapy: A reexamination of the process-outcome correlation paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 909–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. D., Ilfeld, F., Ilfeld, B. S., & Brennan, C. (2000). Group therapy program development: Clinician-administrator collaboration in new practice settings. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50(1), 3–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freimuth M. (2000). Integrating group psychotherapy and 12-step work: A collaborative approach. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50, 297–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutheil, T. G., & Gabbard, G. O. (1998). Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 409–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, C. C., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. M., Hawkins, E., Nielsen, S. L., Slade, K., et al. (2007). Methods of enhancing patient outcome for potential treatment failures: The use of therapist/client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M. & Vitkus, J. (1986). The interpersonal basis of psychiatric symptomatology. Clinical Psychology Review, 6, 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21 st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. S., McCallum, M., Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2000). Role behavior expectancies and alliance change in short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice & Research, 9, 213–225.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. S., Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., and Klein, R. H. (2007). Termination in psychotherapy: A psychodynamic model of processes and outcomes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. (2008). Overcoming our resistances to »doing« evidence-based group practice: A commentary. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64(11), 1284–1291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M. J. & Maxie, A. (2003). Ten considerations for addressing cultural difference in psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszcz, M. (2004). Reflections on the abuse of power, control, and status in group therapy and group therapy training. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 54, 389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leszcz, M. & Kobos, J. C. (2008). Evidence-based group psychotherapy: Using AGPA’s practice guidelines to enhance clinical effectiveness. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64, 1238–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M., Miles, G., & Yalom, I. D. (1973). Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malat, J., Leszcz, M., Negrete, J. C., Turner, N., Collins, J., Liu, E., & Toneatto, T. (2008). Interpersonal group psychotherapy for co-morbid alcohol dependence and non-psychotic psychiatric disorders. The American Journal on Addictions, 17, 402–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Garske, J., Davis, M. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1994). Group development. In A. Fuhriman & G. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy (S. 223–268). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsun, M. (1996). The anti-group: Destructive forces in the group and their creative potential. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogrodniczuk J. S., Piper, W. E., Joyce, A. (2004). Differences in men’s and women’s responses to short-term group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., McCallum, M., Joyce, A., & Rosie, J. S. (2003). Expression of affect as a mediator of the relationship between quality of object relations and group therapy outcome for patients with complicated grief. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 664–671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W. E. & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2004). Brief group therapy. In J. Delucia-Waack, D. A. Gerrity, C. R. Kolodner, & M. T. Riva (Hrsg.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 641–650). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W. E. & Perrault, E. L. (1989). Pre-therapy preparation for group members. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 17–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutan, J. S. & Alonso, A. (1982). Group therapy, individual therapy, or both? International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 32, 267–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. L. & Ginzberg, R. (2002). Parting gifts: Termination rituals in group therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 52, 319–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. N., & Rutan, J. S. (1984). Duration of treatment in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 34, 93–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Bormann, B. (2008). Using the CORE-R battery in group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64, 1225–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V. & Dies, R. R. (1994). Intensive analysis of therapeutic factors and outcome in long-term inpatient group. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 44, 185–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5. Aufl.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 925-600 University Avenue, ON M5G 1´5, Toronto, Canada

    Molyn Leszcz

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Southwestern Medical School, 601 N Durango Circle, TX 75062 6520, Irving, USA

    Joseph C. Kobos

Authors
  1. Molyn Leszcz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph C. Kobos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Molyn Leszcz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany

    Bernhard Strauß

  2. München, Germany

    Dankwart Mattke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leszcz, M., Kobos, J.C. (2018). Wie wissenschaftliche Evidenz praktisch genutzt werden kann: Gruppenpsychotherapie und die »Leitlinien für die klinische Praxis« der American Group Psychotherapy Association (AGPA). In: Strauß, B., Mattke, D. (eds) Gruppenpsychotherapie. Psychotherapie: Praxis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54644-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54644-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54643-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54644-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation