Skip to main content

Towards Verb Modification in Frames

A Case Study on German Schlagen (to hit)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10148))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1335 Accesses

Abstract

Hit-verbs have three basic meaning components, namely movement, contact and force (e.g. [12], Levin 1993), which interact with the verbs’ argument structure in various ways. In this paper, we map out the different grammatical constructions of the German verb schlagen (usually, though loosely, translated as ‘hit’; also ‘beat’, ‘strike’) and their restrictions on agentivity and the force component. Using modification by pure manner adverbs as a tool to test for possible default values of the force component, and agent-oriented adverbs to discover possible interactions with agentivity, we show that German schlagen is rather liberal with respect to its force component. Crucially, the force component may not only be modified by standard, force-denoting manner adverbs such as lightly and hard, but also through agent-oriented adverbs such as playfully, via a defeasible inference. We show further that our findings can be profitably modelled in Frame Semantics, a framework which is especially well suited for modelling a fine-grained decomposition of word meaning, including the manner-related components of verbs.

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with a grant to the Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 991 “The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science”, Projects B09 and C10 (Sebastian Löbner and Wiebke Petersen). Additionally, part of the work was funded by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) (to Anja Goldschmidt). The final version of the paper has profited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers, and from discussion with Sebastian Löbner on the frame modelling. We also thank the audience at the 11th TbiLLC Symposium for their feedback on an earlier version. We would like to acknowledge the help of the Utrecht Institute of Linguistics’ (UiL OTS) statistics advisor, Kirsten Schutter-Pessoa, with the questionnaire data. The order of the authors is chronological, as they joined in at different stages of the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following Vogel (2016) [17], the variant with an accusative object plus a goal PP can be subsumed here as an extended version of the simple transitive construction.

  2. 2.

    Technically, a feature can be defined as an attribute-value pair.

References

  1. Barsalou, L.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: Lehrer, A., Kittay, E.F. (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, pp. 21–74. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dowty, D.: Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowty, D.: Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3), 547–619 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erteschik-Shir, N., Rapoport, T.: Contacts and other results. In: Rappaport-Hovav, M., Doron, E., Sichel, I. (eds.) Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, pp. 59–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fillmore, C.J.: The grammar of hitting and breaking. In: Jacobs, R., Rosenbaum, P. (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 120–133. Ginn, Waltham (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, H., Cheng, C.C.: Vverb of contact by impact in english and their equivalents in mandarin chinese. Lang. Linguist. 4(3), 485–508 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Geuder, W., Gabrovska, E.: Verbs and their modifiers - a pilot study on German schlagen, ms. Univ. of Düsseldorf (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geuder, W.: Manner modification of states. In: Ebert, C., Endriss, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 10, pp. 111–124. ZAS, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kallmeyer, L., Osswald, R.: Syntax-driven semantic frame composition in lexicalized tree adjoining grammars. J. Lang. Model. 1(2), 267–330 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y.: Event construal and its linguistic encoding: towards an extended semantic map model. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakoff, R.: If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. In: Fillmore, C., Langedoen, D. (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pp. 114–149. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc., New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levin, B.: English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parsons, T.: Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petersen, W.: Representation of concepts as frames. In: Gamerschlag, T., Gerland, D., Osswald, R., Petersen, W. (eds.) Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation, pp. 43–67. Düsseldorf University Press, Düsseldorf (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petersen, W., Gamerschlag, T.: Why chocolate eggs can taste old but not oval: a frame-theoretic analysis of inferential evidentials. In: Gamerschlag, T., Gerland, D., Osswald, R., Petersen, W. (eds.) Frames and Concept Types. SLP, vol. 94, pp. 199–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Schäfer, M.: Positions and Interpretations. German Adverbial Adjectives at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogel, R.: Optimal constructions. In: Géraldine Legendre, M.P., Zaroukian, E. (eds.) Advances in Optimality Theoretic-Syntax and Semantics. Oxford University Press, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zwarts, J.: Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguist. Philos. 26(6), 739–779 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Goldschmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Appendix — Example Sentences from the Questionnaires

A Appendix — Example Sentences from the Questionnaires

Sentences testing expectations arising about the force magnitude in the transitive and unaccusative constructions:

  • Sophia schlägt Simon hart.

    ‘Sophia hits Simon hard.’

  • Chris schlägt Alex leicht.

    ‘Chris hits Alex lightly.’

  • Julia schlägt Tobias, aber hart.

    ‘Julia hits Tobias, but hard.’

  • Tobias schlägt Maike, aber leicht.

    ‘Tobias hits Maike, but lightly.’

  • Die Gitarre schlägt hart gegen die Tischkante.

    ‘The guitar hits the edge of the table hard.’

  • Die Gitarre schlägt leicht gegen die Tischkante.

    ‘The guitar hits the edge of the table lightly.’

  • Der Zweig schlägt gegen die Hauswand, aber hart.

    ‘The branch hits the wall of the house, but hard.’

  • Der Zweig schlägt gegen die Hauswand, aber leicht.

    ‘The branch hits the wall of the house, but lightly.’

  • Die Wellen schlagen hart gegen den Deich.

    ‘The waves hit the dyke hard.’

  • Die Wellen schlagen gegen den Deich, aber leicht.

    ‘The waves hit the dyke, but lightly.’

Sentences testing predictions of the agentivity hypothesis:

  • Andrea schlägt Jan spielerisch auf den Arm.

    ‘Andrea hits Jan playfully on the arm.’

  • Chris schlägt Alex leicht auf den Arm.

    ‘Chris hits Alex lightly on the arm.’

  • Die Gitarre schlägt spielerisch gegen die Tischkante.

    ‘The guitar hits the edge of the table playfully.’

  • Der Zweig schlägt leicht gegen die Hauswand.

    ‘The branch hits the wall of the house lightly.’

Sentences testing predictions of the force inference hypothesis:

  • Andrea schlägt Jan spielerisch, aber doch recht leicht, auf den Arm.

    ‘Andrea hits Jan playfully, but still rather lightly, on the arm.’

  • Andrea schlägt Jan spielerisch, aber doch recht hart, auf den Arm.

    ‘Andrea hits Jan playfully, but still rather hard, on the arm.’

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goldschmidt, A., Gamerschlag, T., Petersen, W., Gabrovska, E., Geuder, W. (2017). Towards Verb Modification in Frames. In: Hansen, H., Murray, S., Sadrzadeh, M., Zeevat, H. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54332-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54332-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54331-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54332-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics