Skip to main content

Market Discipline and the Banking Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Industrial Organization of Banking
  • 1385 Accesses

Abstract

The presumption in most discussions of the Basel pillars is that in practice each will prove to reinforce the others. This chapter evaluates this official presumption. It provides a basic overview of the Basel guidelines regarding market discipline and related conceptual issues. It reviews alternative suggestions for contributing to improved bank safety and soundness via enhanced market discipline, including proposals mandating the issuance of subordinated debts. It discusses recent research that encompasses analysis of market discipline within a basic banking model and applies this model to an analysis of the relationship between bank market structure and market discipline. The chapter then considers what the literature tells us about the extent to which markets actually discipline banks and about interactions between market discipline and supervisory discipline applied by government regulators. The chapter concludes by evaluating the market discipline pillar in relation to the Basel capital-standards and supervisory-process pillars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alanis, Emmanuel, Hamid Beladi, and Margot Quijano. 2015. Uninsured deposits as a monitoring device: Their impact on bond yields of banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 52: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Ashiq, Sandy Klasa, and Eric Yeung. 2008. The impact of product market competition on a firm’s disclosure policy and its information environment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas, University of Arizona, and University of Georgia, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Linda, and Aron Gottesman. 2006. The informational efficiency of the equity market as compared to the syndicated bank loan market. Journal of Financial Services Research 30: 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsakka, Rasha, Owain ap Gwilym, and Tuyet Nhung Vu. 2014. The sovereign-bank rating channel and rating agencies' downgrades during the European debt crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance 49: 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrievskaya, Irina, and Maria Semenova. 2016. Does banking system transparency enhance bank competition? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Stability 23: 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anolli, Mario, Elena Beccalli, and Philip Molyneux. 2014. Bank earnings forecasts, risk, and the crisis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Instruments, and Money 29: 309–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, Adam. 2008. Does the market discipline banks? New evidence from the regulatory capital mix. Journal of Financial Intermediation 17: 543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, Adam, and Hoyt Bleakley. 2006. On the market discipline of informationally opaque firms: Evidence from bank borrowers in the federal funds market, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 257, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvray, Tristan, and Olivier Brossard. 2012. Too dispersed to monitor? Ownership dispersion, monitoring, and the prediction of bank distress. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 44: 685–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramnian, Bhanu, and Ken Cyree. 2011. Market discipline of banks: Why are yield spreads on bank-issued subordinated notes and debentures not sensitive to bank risks? Journal of Banking and Finance 35: 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramnian, Bhanu, and Ken Cyree. 2014. Has market discipline on banks improved after the Dodd-Frank Act? Journal of Banking and Finance 41: 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements. 2006. International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework comprehensive version, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barajas, Adolfo, and Mario Catalán. 2015. Market discipline and conflicts of interest between banks and pension funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation 24: 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, James, Gerard Caprio Jr, and Ross Levine. 2004. Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation 13: 205–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, James, Gerard Caprio Jr, and Ross Levine. 2006. Rethinking Bank Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir, Mohamed. 2013. Do subordinated debt holders discipline bank risk-taking? Evidence from risk management decisions. Journal of Financial Stability 9: 705–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen, and Sally Davies. 1998. The information content of bank examinations. Journal of Financial Services Research 14: 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen, and Rima Turk-Ariss. 2015. Do depositors discipline banks and did government actions during the recent crisis reduce this discipline? An international perspective. Journal of Financial Services Research 48: 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen, Sally Davies, and Mark Flannery. 2000. Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: Who knows what when? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32: 641–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertay, Ata Can, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Harry Huizinga. 2013. Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy, and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation 22: 532–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyhaghi, Mehdi, Chris D’Souza, and Gordon Roberts. 2014. Funding advantage and market discipline in the Canadian banking sector. Journal of Banking and Finance 48: 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billet, Matthew, Jon Garfinkel, and Edward O’Neal. 1998. The cost of market versus regulatory discipline in banking. Journal of Financial Economics 48: 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, Matthew, Mark Flannery, and Jon Garfinkel. 1995. The effect of lender identity on a borrowing firm’s equity return. Journal of Finance 50: 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchler, Urs, and Andréa Maechler. 2001. Do depositors discipline Swiss banks? Swiss National Bank Working Paper No. 1.06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, Robert. 2001. Market discipline and subordinated debt: A review of some salient issues. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, First Quarter: 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, Robert. 2004. Market discipline: Players, processes, and purposes. In Market Discipline Across Countries and Industries, ed. Claudio Borio, William Hunter, George Kaufman, and Kostas Tsatsaronis, 37–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, Robert, and Mark Flannery. 2000. Market discipline in the governance of U.S. bank holding companies: Monitoring versus influencing. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Jürg. 2002. Subordinated debt, market discipline, and banks’ risk taking. Journal of Banking and Finance 26: 1427–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Patrick, Xavier Freixas, and Joel Shapiro. 2004. Conflicts of interest, information provision, and competition in banking. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10571, June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Philip, Itay Goldstein, and Edward Simpson Prescott. 2008. Market-based corrective action. Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, Arnoud, and Anjolein Schmeits. 2000. Market discipline and incentive problems in conglomerate firms with applications to banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 9: 240–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boot, Arnoud, and Anjan Thakor. 2001. The many faces of information disclosure. Review of Financial Studies 14: 1021–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, Michael. 2003. Market discipline and financial crisis policy: A historical perspective. In Market Discipline in Banking: Theory and Evidence, ed. George Kaufman, 157–182. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, Charles. 1999. Building an incentive-compatible safety net. Journal of Banking and Finance 23: 1499–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, Charles. 2004. Reestablishing market discipline as a part of bank regulation. In Market Discipline Across Countries and Industries, ed. Claudio Borio, William Hunter, George Kaufman, and Kostas Tsatsaronis, 407–421. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, Charles, and Charles Kahn. 1991. The role of demandable debt in structuring optimal banking arrangements. American Economic Review 81: 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, Charles, and Andrew Powell. 2000. Can emerging market bank regulators establish credible discipline? The case of Argentina, 1992–1999. NBER Working Paper No. 7715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caner, Selçuk, Süheyla Özyıldırım, and A. Ece Ungan. 2012. How sensitive are bank managers to shareholder value? Journal of Financial Services Research 42: 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannata, Francesco, and Mario Quagliariello. 2005. The value of market information in banking supervision: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Financial Services Research 27: 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaigneau, Pierre. 2013. Risk-shifting and the regulation of bank CEOs’ compensation. Journal of Financial Stability 9: 776–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Yehning, and Iftekhar Hasan. 2006. The transparency of the banking system and the efficiency of information-based bank runs. Journal of Financial Intermediation 15: 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihak, Martin, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, Maria Soledad Martinez Peria, and Amin Mohseni-Cheraghlou. 2013. Bank regulation and supervision in the context of the global crisis. Journal of Financial Stability 9: 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Rebel, and Jeffrey Gunther. 1998. Predicting bank failures: A comparison of on- and off-site monitoring systems. Journal of Financial Services Research 13: 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covitz, Daniel, Diana Hancock, and Myron Kwast. 2004. Market discipline in banking reconsidered: The roles of funding managers’ decisions and deposit insurance reform. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Financial and Economics Discussion Series No. 2004-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubillas, Elena, Ana Rosa Fonseca, and Francisco González. 2012. Banking crises and market discipline: International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 36: 2285–2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Andrew, and Kathleen McDill. 2006. The depositor behind the discipline: A micro-level case study of Hamilton Bank. Journal of Financial Services Research 30: 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decamps, Jean-Paul, Jean-Charles Rochet, and Benoit Roger. 2004. The three pillars of Basel II: Optimizing the mix. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13: 132–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Enrica Detragiache, and Thierry Tressel. 2008. Banking on the principles: Compliance with Basel core principles and bank soundness. Journal of Financial Intermediation 17: 511–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, Robert, and Karin Roland. 2001. Product mix and earnings volatility at commercial banks: Evidence from a degree of total leverage model. Journal of Financial Intermediation 10: 54–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distinguin, Isabelle, Philippe Rous, and Amine Tarazi. 2006. Market discipline and the use of stock market data to predict bank financial distress. Journal of Financial Services Research 30: 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, Douglas, and Larry Wall. 2000. Subordinated debt as bank capital: A proposal for regulatory reform. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 24: 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, Douglas, and Larry Wall. 2001. Sub-debt yield spreads as bank risk measures. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, Douglas, Julapa Jagtiani, and Taisuke Nakata. 2011. Enhancing market discipline in banking: The role of subordinated debt in financial regulatory reform. Journal of Economics and Business 63: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, Mark. 1998. Using market information in prudential supervision: A review of the U.S. empirical evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30: 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, Mark. 2001. The faces of “market discipline”. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, Mark, and Sorin Sorescu. 1996. Evidence of bank market discipline in subordinated debenture yields: 1983–1991. Journal of Finance 51: 1347–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, Mark, Simon Kwan, and M. Nimalendran. 2004. Market evidence on the opaqueness of banking firms’ assets. Journal of Financial Economics 71: 419–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forssbæk, Jens. 2011. Ownership structure, market discipline, and banks’ risk-taking incentives under deposit insurance. Journal of Banking and Finance 35: 2666–2678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. Alton. 1990. Market discipline of bank risk: Theory and evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January–February 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, Vidhan. 2005. Market discipline of bank risk: Evidence from subordinated debt contracts. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14: 318–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Paul, Sarah Jewell, and Ian Tonks. 2012. Executive pay and performance: Did bankers’ bonuses cause the crisis? International Review of Finance 12: 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, Jeffery, and Robert Moore. 2003. Loss underreporting and the auditing role of bank exams. Journal of Financial Intermediation 12: 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, Jens, Michael Collins, and Kevin Keasey. 2008. Regulation, board monitoring, and merger performance: Evidence from acquiring banks in the U.S. and Europe. Manuscript, Leeds University Business School and University of Leeds, August 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakenes, Hendrik, and Isabel Schnabel. 2014. Bank bonuses and bailouts. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 46: 259–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamalainen, Paul, Maximilian Hall, and Barry Howcroft. 2003. Market discipline: A theoretical framework for regulatory policy development. In Market Discipline in Banking: Theory and Evidence, ed. George Kaufman, 57–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Diana, and Myron Kwast. 2001. Using subordinated debt to monitor bank holding companies: Is it feasible? Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 147–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasman, Augusto, Margarita Samartin, and Jos Van Bommel. 2013. Financial contagion and depositor monitoring. Journal of Banking and Finance 37: 3076–3084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, Thomas, Kevin Murdock, and Joseph Stiglitz. 2000. Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation: Are capital requirements enough? American Economic Review 90: 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, Richard. 2004. How can the invisible hand strengthen prudential regulation and how can prudential regulation strengthen the invisible hand? In Market Discipline Across Countries and Industries, ed. Claudio Borio, William Hunter, George Kaufman, and Kostas Tsatsaronis, 363–379. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Rocco, and Lev Ratnovski. 2008. The dark side of bank wholesale funding. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 09-3, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannotta, Giuliano. 2006. Testing for opaqueness in the European banking industry: Evidence from bond credit ratings. Journal of Financial Services Research 30: 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, John, Joe Peek, and Eric Rosengren. 2000. The market reaction to the disclosure of supervisory actions: Implications for bank transparency. Journal of Financial Intermediation 9: 298–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaoglu, N. Emre. 2005. Regulatory capital and earnings management in banks: The case of loan sales and securitizations. FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 2005-5, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karas, Alexei, William Pyle, and Koen Schoors. 2013. Deposit insurance, banking crises, and market discipline: Evidence from a natural experiment on deposit flows and rates. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 45: 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Thomas. 2008. Discipline and liquidity in the interbank market. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 40: 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwast, Myron, Daniel Covitz, Diana Hancock, James Houpt, David Adkins, Norah Barger, Barbary Bouchard, John Connolly, Thomas Brady, William English, Douglas Evanoff, and Larry Wall. 1999. Using subordinated debt as an instrument of market discipline. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Staff Study 172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landskroner, Yoram, and Jacob Paroush. 2008. Bank management and market discipline. Journal of Economics and Business 60: 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, Wayne. 2006. Fair value accounting for financial instruments: Some implications for bank regulation. BIS Working Paper No. 209, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Timothy. 1993. Market discipline. IMF Staff Papers 40: 53–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, William, and Douglas Robertson. 2002. Analysis of proposals for a minimum subordinated debt requirement. Journal of Economics and Business 54: 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Li, and Frank Song. 2013. Do bank regulations affect board independence? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 37: 2714–2732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, David, and David Mayes. 2003. The role of market discipline in handling problem banks. In Market Discipline in Banking: Theory and Evidence, ed. George Kaufman, 183–210. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maclachlan, Fiona. 2001. Market discipline in bank regulation: Panacea or paradox? The Independent Review 6: 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDill, Kathleen, and Andrea Maechler. 2003. Do uninsured depositors vote with their feet? In Market Discipline in Banking: Theory and Evidence, ed. George Kaufman, 211–248. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Diego, and Tuomas Takalo. 2016. Optimal bank transparency. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 48: 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Donald. 2002. Rating banks: Risk and uncertainty in an opaque industry. American Economic Review 92: 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Donald, and Kevin Stiroh. 2001. Market discipline of banks: The asset test. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nier, Erlend, and Ursel Baumann. 2006. Market discipline, disclosure, and moral hazard in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 15: 332–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, Jijun. 2008. Bank competition, risk, and subordinated debt. Journal of Financial Services Research 33: 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östberg, Per. 2006. Disclosure, investment, and regulation. Journal of Financial Intermediation 15: 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sangkyun, and Stavros Peristiani. 1998. Market discipline by thrift depositors. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30: 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sangkyun, and Stavros Peristiani. 2007. Are bank shareholders enemies of regulators or a potential source of market discipline? Journal of Banking and Finance 31: 2493–2515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peresetsky, Anatoly, Alexander Karminsky, and Sergei Golovan. 2007. Russian banks’ private deposit interest rates and market discipline. Bank of Finland BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 2/2007, January 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podpiera, Richard. 2006. Does compliance with Basel core principles bring any measurable benefits? IMF Staff Papers 53: 306–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, Edward Simpson. 2008. Should bank supervisors disclose information about their banks? Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 94: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repullo, Rafael. 2004. Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13: 156–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Xavier Vives. 2004. Coordination failures and the lender of last resort: Was Bagehot right after all? Journal of the European Economic Association 2: 1116–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Anthony. 2001. Comments on Evanoff and Wall/Hancock and Kwast. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sironi, Andrea. 2001. An analysis of European banks’ SND issues and its implications for the design of a mandatory subordinated debt policy. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 223–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse, Solomon. 2005. Banking fragility and disclosure: International evidence. Manuscript, University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, John. 2014. Bank pay caps, bank risk, and macroprudential regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance 48: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, John, and Misa Tanaka. 2015. Bankers’ pay and excessive risk. Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 558, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tassel, Eric. 2011. Information disclosure in credit markets when banks’ costs are endogenous. Journal of Banking and Finance 35: 490–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanHoose, David. 2011a. Regulation of bank management compensation. In Financial Market Regulation: Legislation and Implications, ed. John Tatom, 163–183. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • VanHoose, David. 2011b. Regulatory constraints on performance-based managerial compensation, bank monitoring, and aggregate loan quality. Atlantic Economic Journal 39: 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vauhkonen, Jukka. 2012. The impact of pillar 3 disclosure requirements on bank safety. Journal of Financial Services Research 41: 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, Robert. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Zhichao, Wei Song, Xin Sun, and Nan Shi. 2014. Subordinated debt as an instrument of market discipline: Risk sensitivity of sub-debt yield spreads in UK banking. Journal of Economics and Business 73: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

VanHoose, D. (2017). Market Discipline and the Banking Industry. In: The Industrial Organization of Banking. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54326-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54326-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54325-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54326-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics