Skip to main content

Meniscus Scaffolds: Past, Present, and Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bio-orthopaedics
  • 1933 Accesses

Abstract

Failure in maintaining the integrity of meniscus results in increased stresses on the cartilage, leading to cartilage degeneration, irreversible joint damage and osteoarthiritis. This finding led to increased tendency towards meniscus preserving surgery over partial or total meniscectomy. Meniscus scaffolds are developed to overcome devastating outcomes of partial meniscectomies. In order to establish the ideal scaffold, numerous biomaterials have been studied so far. Currently, meniscal scaffolds represent a rather good treatment option for patients with painful knees after partial meniscectomy. With correct indications and appropriate technical implantation, relief of symptoms along with improvement in functional status can be expected in majority of patients. Implantation of meniscal scaffolds does not preclude accompanying surgical procedures in most cases and combined surgical procedures are rather common. Still there is space for further improvements in the scaffold technology as current implants in use still have inferior mechanical properties when compared to the native meniscus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bouyarmane H, Beaufils P, Pujol N, et al. Polyurethane scaffold in lateral meniscus segmental defects: clinical outcomes at 24 months follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1):153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faivre B, Bouyarmane H, Lonjon G, et al. Actifit® scaffold implantation: influence of preoperative meniscal extrusion on morphological and clinical outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(6):703–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelber PE, Petrica AM, Isart A, et al. The magnetic resonance aspect of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold is worse in advanced cartilage defects without deterioration of clinical outcomes after a minimum two-year follow-up. Knee. 2015;22(5):389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahler SA, Rodeo SA, Doty SB, et al. Evaluation of a porous polyurethan scaffold in a partial meniscal defect ovine model. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(11):1510–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandal BB, Park S, Gil ES, et al. Multilayered silk scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32(2):639–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouzopoulos G, Siebold R. Partial meniscus substitution with tissue-engineered scaffold: an overview. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(1):167–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Myers KR, Sgaglione NA, Kurzweil PR. A current update on meniscal scaffolds. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2013;21:75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papalia R, Franceschi F, Diaz Balzani L, et al. Scaffolds for partial meniscal replacement: an updated systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2013;107:19–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rongen JJ, van Tienen TG, van Bochove B, et al. Biomaterials in search of a meniscus substitute. Biomaterials. 2014;35(11):3527–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scotti C, Hirschmann MT, Antinolfi P, et al. Meniscus repair and regeneration: review on current methods and research potential. Eur Cell Mater. 2013;26:150–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulgheroni P, Murena L, Ratti C, et al. Follow-up of collagen meniscus implant patients: clinical, radiological, and magnetic resonance imaging results at 5 years. Knee. 2010;17:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kon E, Chiari C, Marcacci M, et al. Tissue engineering for total meniscal substitution: animal study in sheep model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(6):1067–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7411–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fairbank TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30B(4):689–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verdonk R, Verdonk P, Huysse W, et al. Tissue ingrowth after implantation of a novel, biodegradable polyurethane scaffold for treatment of partial meniscal lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):774–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer SJ, Saithna A, Carmont MR, et al. Meniscal scaffolds: early experience and review of the literature. Knee. 2012;19:760–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van der Bracht, Verdonk R, Verbruggen G, et al. Cell-based meniscus tissue engineering. In: Ashammakhi N, Reis R, Chiellini E, editors. Topics in tissue-engineering, vol. 3. Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Group (BTE); 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stabile KJ, Odom D, Smith TL, et al. An acellular, allograft-derived meniscus scaffold in an ovine model. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(7):936–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Warth RJ, Rodkey WG. Resorbable collagen scaffolds for the treatment of meniscus defects: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(5):927–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milachowski KA, Wiesmeier K, Wirth CJ. Homologous meniscus transplantation: experimental and clinical results. Int Orthop. 1989;13(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone KR, Rodkey WG, Webber R, et al. Meniscal regeneration with copolymeric collagen scaffolds. In vitro and in vivo studies evaluated clinically, histologically, and biochemically. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):104–11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stone KR, Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, et al. Regeneratiion of meniscal cartilage with use of a collagen scaffold. Analysis of preliminary data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(12):1770–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kon E, Filardo G, Zaffagnini S, et al. Biodegradable polyurethane meniscal scaffold for isolated partial lesions or as combined procedure for knees with multiple comorbidities: clinical results at 2 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(1):128–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaffagnini S, Fink C, Grassi A, et al. Meniskusimplantate indikationen und ergebnisse. Arthroskopie. 2015;28(1):38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodkey WG. Menaflex™ collagen meniscus implant: basic science. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 367–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodkey WG, DeHaven KE, Montgomery WH, et al. Comparison of the collagen meniscus implant to partial meniscectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1413–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinarejos P, Erggelet C, Monllau JC. Collagen meniscus implant: basic science, technique and results. In: Hulet C, Pereira H, Pereira G, Denti M, editors. Surgery of the meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 531–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith NA, Parkinson B, Spalding T. Meniscal allograft transplantation and meniscal scaffolds; where are we up to now? Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tucker B, Khan W, Al-Rashid M, et al. Tissue engineering for the meniscus: a review of the literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:348–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Lopomo N, et al. Prospective long-term outcomes of the medial collagen meniscus implant versus partial medial meniscectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(5):977–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Monllau JC, Gelber PE, Abat F, et al. Outcome after partial medial meniscus substitution with the collagen meniscal implant at a minimum of 10 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(7):933–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications of a collagen meniscus implant: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2014;38(9):1945–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Monllau JC, Pelfort X, Tey M. Collagen meniscus implant: technique and results. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 373–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. De Groot J. Actifit, polyurethane meniscus implant: basic science. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 383–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Pujol N, Verdonk P. Actifit polyurethane meniscus scaffold: basic science, techniques and results. In: Hulet C, Pereira H, Pereira G, Denti M, editors. Surgery of the meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 543–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Verdonk R, Verdonk P, Heinrichs EL. Polyurethane meniscus implant: technique. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 389–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Verdonk P, Beaufils P, Bellermans J, et al. Successful treatment of painful irreparable partial meniscal defects with a polyurethane scaffold: two year safety and clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):844–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verdonk P. The future. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 399–400.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Guo W, Liu S, Zhu Y et al. Advances and prospects in tissue-engineered meniscal scaffolds for meniscus regeneration. Stem Cell Int. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/517520.

  40. Gunja NJ, Uthamanthill RK, Athanasiou KA. Effects of TGF-β1 and hydrostatic pressure on meniscus cell-seeded scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:565–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarper Gursu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gursu, S., Karahan, M. (2017). Meniscus Scaffolds: Past, Present, and Future. In: Gobbi, A., Espregueira-Mendes, J., Lane, J., Karahan, M. (eds) Bio-orthopaedics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54181-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54181-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54180-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54181-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics