Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life Cycle and Environmental Cycle Assessment of Biodegradable Plastics for Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Soil Degradable Bioplastics for a Sustainable Modern Agriculture

Part of the book series: Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology ((GCST))

Abstract

The study of the life cycle of products for the quantification of their environmental impacts, in each of their production and utilization stages, is a well-established and scientifically recognized methodology. This approach is known as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and it is the base for several product and service certifications. This chapter focuses on the strengths and weakness of the LCA approach to biodegradable plastic in agriculture, thorough the description of main issues emerged from an extensive literature search and key case studies. In particular, studies which apply LCA on biodegradable mulching films and nursery pots are presented and discussed. Results of the study are somehow controversial. Despite the fact that LCA is the most systematic way to understand the interrelation between a product and the environment (including biodegradable products), some specific issues, related to the own nature of biodegradable products, require a more detailed way to be properly addressed. In particular crucial issues are related to the modelling of realistic waste management scenarios, the development of more appropriate impact categories (e.g. effects of littering) and the assessment of biorefineries which represent the only non-fossil carbon source for bio-based plastic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment, vol 11. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  2. EU-European Commission (2010) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook e general guide for life cycle assessment e detailed guidance. Institute for Environment and Sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA. An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MA (2015) Life cycle impact assessment LCA compendium—the complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  5. Audsley E, Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz P, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliet O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H, Weidema B, van Zeijts H (1997) Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture. Final report concerted action AIR3-CT94-2028 European Commission DG VI Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weidema BP, Thrane M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Løkke S (2008) Carbon footprint. A catalyst for life cycle assessment? J Ind Ecol 12(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zamagni A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(4):373–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerutti AK, Bruun S, Donno D, Beccaro GL, Bounous G (2013) Environmental sustainability of traditional foods: the case of ancient apple cultivars in Northern Italy assessed by multifunctional LCA. J Clean Prod 52:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi K (2013) Practical recommendations for supporting agricultural decisions through life cycle assessment based on two alternative views of crop production: the example of organic conversion. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu EK, He WQ, Yan CR (2014) ‘White revolution’to ‘white pollution’—agricultural plastic film mulch in China. Environ Res Lett 9(9):091001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Notarnicola B, Salomone R, Petti L, Renzulli PA, Roma R, Cerutti AK (eds) (2015) Life Cycle assessment in the agri-food sector: case studies methodological issues and best practices. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  13. van der Werf HM, Garnett T, Corson MS, Hayashi K, Huisingh D, Cederberg C (2014) Towards eco-efficient agriculture and food systems: theory praxis and future challenges. J Clean Prod 73:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss M, Haufe J, Carus M, Brandão M, Bringezu S, Hermann B, Patel MK (2012) A review of the environmental impacts of biobased materials. J Ind Ecol 16(s1):S169–S181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dinkel F, Pohl C, Ros M, Waldeck B (1996) Ökobilanz stärkehaltiger Kunststoffe (Nr 271) 2 volumes. Study prepared by CARBOTECH Basel for the Bundesamt für Umwelt und Landschaft (BUWAL) Bern Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patel M, Bastioli C, Marini L, Würdinger E (2005) Life‐cycle assessment of bio‐based polymers and natural fiber composites. Biopolymers online

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shen L, Patel MK (2008) Life cycle assessment of polysaccharide materials: a review. J Polym Environ 16(2):154–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gironi F, Piemonte V (2011) Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: strengths and weaknesses. Energy Sources Part A: Recovery Utilization Environ Eff 33(21):1949–1959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yates MR, Barlow CY (2013) Life cycle assessments of biodegradable commercial biopolymers—a critical review. Resour Conserv Recycl 78:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. La Rosa AD, Recca G, Summerscales J, Latteri A, Cozzo G, Cicala G (2014) Bio-based versus traditional polymer composites a life cycle assessment perspective. J Clean Prod 74:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pawelzik P, Carus M, Hotchkiss J, Narayan R, Selke S, Wellisch M, Weiss M, Wicke B, Patel MK (2013) Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials—reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koeser AK, Lovell ST, Petri AC, Brumfield RG, Stewart JR (2014) Biocontainer use in a Petunia × hybrida greenhouse production system: a cradle-to-gate carbon footprint assessment of secondary impacts. HortScience 49(3):265–271

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lazzerini G, Lucchetti S, Nicese FP (2014) Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from ornamental plant production: a nursery level approach. Urban For Urban Greening 13(3):517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Girgenti V, Peano C, Baudino C, Tecco N (2014) From “farm to fork” strawberry system: current realities and potential innovative scenarios from life cycle assessment of non-renewable energy use and green house gas emissions. Sci Total Environ 473:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Razza F, Farachi F, Tosin M, Degli Innocenti F, Guerrini S (2010) Assessing the environmental performance and eco-toxicity effects of biodegradable mulch films. In: VIIth international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector, Bari, pp 22–24)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sorema (2008) Recycling schemes for thin mulching agricultural film analysis of the process and application examples. International Congress Plastic & Agricolture MACPLAS 2008. Bari, Italy 21–22 Feb 2008. http://wwwmacplas08org/

  27. Garthe JW, Miller BG (2006) Burning high-grade clean fuel made from low-grade used agricultural plastics. Solid Waste Technol Manage 802–809

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eriksen M, Lebreton LC, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ, Borerro JC, Reisser J (2014) Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS ONE 9(12):e111913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dianjie N, Honge X, Liangsheng G, Dongmei Z, Haizhen Z, Pinghe R, Sbiwei C (1996) Study of the influence of the residue film on soil and cotton growth in the cotton fields. Acta Gossypii Sinica 1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li F, Zhang L, Cui J, Dong H, Zhang C, Wang G (2005) Study of agricultural tri-dimension pollution on ecological system in cotton field and its control tactics. Cotton Sci 17(5):299–303

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reynolds A (2010) Updated views on the development opportunities in agricultural film markets. In: Proceeding of the international conference on horticultural and agricultural films and covers, Barcelona, 22–24 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kapanen A, Schettini E, Vox G, Itävaara M (2008) Performance and environmental impact of biodegradable films in agriculture: a field study on protected cultivation. J Polym Environ 16(2):109–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bastioli C, Facco S (2001) Mater-Bi starch based materials: present situation and future perspectives. In: Biodegradable plastics conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 26–27 Nov

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Sica C, Russo G (2012) Plastic materials in European agriculture: actual use and perspectives. J Agric Eng 42(3):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cozzolino E, Leone V, Carella A, Piro F (2010) Mater-Bi® contro polietilene: più prodotto costi equivalenti. L’informatore Agrario 27

    Google Scholar 

  36. LCA discussion list personal communications Tuesday 31st of March 2015 and Wednesday 1st of April 2015. http://wwwpre-sustainabilitycom/lca-discussion-list

  37. Cerutti AK, Beccaro GL, Bruun S, Bosco S, Donno D, Notarnicola B, Bounous G (2014) Life cycle assessment application in the fruit sector: state of the art and recommendations for environmental declarations of fruit products. J Clean Prod 73:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. European Commission DG Agriculture and Rural Development (2013) Live plants and products of floriculture. Working document of the Advisory Group Flowers and ornamental plants. http://eceuropaeu/agriculture/fruit-and-vegetables/product-reports. Accessed 220414

  39. Russo G, De Lucia Zeller B (2008) Environmental evaluation by means of LCA regarding the ornamental nursery production in rose and sowbread greenhouse cultivation. Acta Hort 801(2):1597–1604

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nambuthiri S, Fulcher A, Koeser AK, Geneve R, Niu G (2015) Moving toward sustainability with alternative containers for greenhouse and nursery crop production: a review and research update. Hort Technol 25(1):8–16

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kendall A, McPherson EG (2012) A life cycle greenhouse gas inventory of a tree production system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(4):444–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beccaro GL, Cerutti AK, Vandecasteele I, Bonvegna L, Donno D, Bounous G (2014) Assessing environmental impacts of nursery production: methodological issues and results from a case study in Italy. J Clean Prod 80:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Harding KG, Dennis JS, Von Blottnitz H, Harrison STL (2007) Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis. J Biotechnol 130(1):57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Plastic Europe (2005) Eco-profiles of the European plastic industry. http://wwwplasticseuropeorg/plastics-sustainability-14017/eco-profilesaspx

  45. Federal Government of Germany (2012) Biorefineries roadmap (as part of the German Federal Government action plans for the material and energetic utilisation of renewable raw materials). (www.bmbfde/pub/roadmap_biorefineriespdf)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Novamont, Terni, Italy

    Francesco Razza

  2. Department of Agriculture, Forestry Food Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Alessandro K. Cerutti

Authors
  1. Francesco Razza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro K. Cerutti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Razza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials (IPCB-CNR), Pozzuoli, Italy

    Mario Malinconico

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Razza, F., Cerutti, A.K. (2017). Life Cycle and Environmental Cycle Assessment of Biodegradable Plastics for Agriculture. In: Malinconico, M. (eds) Soil Degradable Bioplastics for a Sustainable Modern Agriculture. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54130-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation