Skip to main content

Achieving While Maintaining:

A Logic of Knowing How with Intermediate Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic and Its Applications (ICLA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10119))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a ternary knowing how operator to express that the agent knows how to achieve \(\varphi \) given \(\psi \) while maintaining \(\chi \) in-between. It generalizes the logic of goal-directed knowing how proposed by Wang in [10]. We give a sound and complete axiomatization of this logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [12] for a survey.

  2. 2.

    See [1, 4, 10] for detailed discussions on related work in AI and Philosophy.

  3. 3.

    This ternary modality is first proposed and discussed briefly in the full version of [10], which is under submission.

  4. 4.

    We can obtain the corresponding axioms by taking the intermediate constraint as \(\top \). Note that in [10], we use the name WKKh for \(\mathtt {UKh}\).

  5. 5.

    In [10], the canonical models are much simpler: we just need MCSs and the canonical relations are simply labeled by \(\langle \psi , \varphi \rangle \) for \(\mathcal {K}h{(\psi ,\varphi )}\in \varGamma \).

  6. 6.

    However, the announcement operator \([\varphi ]\) is not reducible in \(\mathbf {L_{Khm}}\) as discussed in the full version of [10] which is under submission.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Goranko, V., Jamroga, W., Wooldridge, M.: Knowledge and ability. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Halpern, J., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B. (eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Logic, chapter 11, pp. 543–589. College Publications (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fan, J., Wang, Y., van Ditmarsch, H.: Almost necessary. Adv. Modal Logic 10, 178–196 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fan, J., Wang, Y., van Ditmarsch, H.: Contingency and knowing whether. Rev. Symbolic Logic 8, 75–107 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gochet, P.: An open problem in the logic of knowing how. In: Hintikka, J. (ed.), Open Problems in Epistemology. The Philosophical Society of Finland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gu, T., Wang, Y.: Knowing value logic as a normal modal logic. In: Beklemishev, L., Demri, S., Máté, A. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 11, pp. 362–381 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lau, T., Wang, Y.: Knowing your ability. The Philosophical Forum (2016, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, D.E., Weld, D.S.: Conformant graphplan. In: AAAI, vol. 98, pp. 889–896 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. von Wright, G.H.: An Essay in Modal Logic. North Holland, Amsterdam (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Y.: A logic of knowing how. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W.H., Wang, W. (eds.) LORI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9394, pp. 392–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y.: Representing imperfect information of procedures with hyper models. In: Banerjee, M., Krishna, S.N. (eds.) ICLA 2015. LNCS, vol. 8923, pp. 218–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45824-2_16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Y.: Beyond knowing that: a new generation of epistemic logics. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Sandu, G. (eds.), Jaakko Hintikka on knowledge and game theoretical semantics. Springer, Heidelberg (2016, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., Fan, J.: Knowing that, knowing what, and public communication: public announcement logic with Kv operators. Proc. IJCAI 13, 1147–1154 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y., Fan, J.: Conditionally knowing what. Adv. Modal Logic 10, 569–587 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, Q., Li, Y., Wang, Y.: A dynamic epistemic framework for conformant planning. In: Proceedings of TARK 2015, pp. 298–318 (2015). EPTCS 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanjun Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Wang, Y. (2017). Achieving While Maintaining:. In: Ghosh, S., Prasad, S. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54069-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54069-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54068-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54069-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics