Summary
Psychoanalysis is known above all else for its insistence that we have motivations that are unknown to ourselves, that are unconscious. We are all subject to sickness and accident, to bad luck and unfair breaks, and above all to death as a final end to all our endeavours. In order to compensate for these disappointments and for our ultimate inability to overcome these very real and material constraints we phantasise, we dream, we create, and/or we nurse our bruised and fragile selves by hoping that our phantasies might come true, if not for ourselves then for our offspring. The singularity, as it is most commonly expressed, concerns the possibility of overcoming death by achieving a sort of immortality. In specific terms Kurtweil’s own discussion of the singularity is concerned with the possibility of ‘resurrecting’ his dead father in virtual space at least. There is consistently throughout the writings on the singularity a dismissal of the emotional aspect of human living in favour of the rational overcoming of our existential condition. I am arguing that we cannot ignore the emotional consciousness that is the bedrock of human existence and that we ignore our unconscious feelings at our peril. I think that the singularity as it is being developed is actually a direct threat to the flourishing of human beings and human society because the emotional shortcomings of the theory have not been recognised.
All of us should ask ourselves what we can do now to improve the chances of reaping the benefits and avoiding the risks.
Stephen Hawking is Terrified of Artificial Intelligence, Huffington Post 5/5/2014.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This places my approach in the ‘Societal Proposals’ of the introductory survey.
References
Bhaskar, R. (1989) The Possibility of Naturalism. Routledge: London.
Chomsky, N. The Singularity is Science Fiction http://www.singularityweblog.com/noam-chomsky-the-singularity-is-science-fiction/ (last accessed May 2014).
Clarke, G. S. (2006) Personal Relations Theory: Fairbairn, Macmurray and Suttie. Routledge: London.
Clarke, G. S. and Scharff, D. E. (Eds) (2014) Fairbairn and the object relations tradition. Karnac: London.
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952) Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. Routledge: London.
Gray, J. (2015) The Soul of the Marionette: A Short Enquiry into Human Freedom, Allen Lane: London.
Hofstadter, D. R. (2007) An interview with Douglas. R. Hofstadter http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/douglas-r-hofstadter (last accessed May 2014).
Hofstadter, D. R. (2008) An interview with Douglas.R.Hofstadter following “I am a strange loop”. http://tal.forum2.org/hofstadter_interview (last accessed 5th May 2014).
Hofstadter, D. R. (2009) The Singularity Summit at Stanford. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiepYwKPcxc (last accessed May 2014).
Japanese ‘robot with a heart’ will care for the elderly and children, (http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/japanese-robot-with-a-heart-will-care-for-the-elderly-and-children-9491819.html) (last accessed June 2015).
Kurzweil, R. (2009) The Singularity is Near, Duckworth: London.
Kurzweil, R. (2014) A review of ‘Her’ by Ray Kurzweil. http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-review-of-her-by-ray-kurzweil (last accessed May 2014).
Lanier, J. (2010) You are not a gadget. Allan Lane: London.
Lanier, J. (2013) Who owns the future. Penguin: London.
Lewis, M. (2014) Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt. W.W.Norton and Company.
Lucas, R. (2014) Review of Jaron Lanier “Who Owns the Future”. Rob Lucas New Left Review 86 Mar/Apr 2014.
Macmurray, J. (1961) Persons in Relation. Faber and Faber: London.
Modis, T. (2006) The Singularity Myth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, No 2.
Penrose, R. and Hameroff, S. Orchestrated objective reduction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction (last accessed June 2015).
Picard, R. blog: http://rdigitalife.com/rosalind-picard-blog/ (last accessed May 2014).
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First century. Harvard University Press.
Solms, M. and Panksepp, J. (2012) Abstract: The “Id” knows more than the “Ego” admits: neuropsychoanalytic and primal consciousness perspectives on the interface between affective and cognitive neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 2: 147–175.
Turkle, S. (1978) Psychoanalytic Politics: Jacques Lacan and Freud’s French Revolution.
Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Self. MIT Press.
Turkle, S (1995) Life on the screen. Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
Turkle, S. (2004) Whither psychoanalysis in Computer culture? Psychoanalytic Psychology Vol. 21, No 1. 16–30.
Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other.
Wearden, G. (2014) Oxfam: 85 richest people as wealthy as poorest half of the world. Guardian, 20th January 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clarke, G. (2017). A Psychoanalytic Approach to the Singularity: Why We Cannot Do Without Auxiliary Constructions. In: Callaghan, V., Miller, J., Yampolskiy, R., Armstrong, S. (eds) The Technological Singularity. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54033-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54033-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54031-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54033-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)